Message 113780 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	lemburg
Recipients	eric.araujo, lemburg, pitrou, r.david.murray, vstinner
Date	2010-08-13.14:54:28
SpamBayes Score	8.528652e-08
Marked as misclassified	No
Message-id	<[email protected]>
In-reply-to	<[email protected]>

Content
STINNER Victor wrote: > > STINNER Victor <[email protected]> added the comment: > > @r.david.murray, @lemburg: So, can I commit my patch? Yes, go ahead with 3.2 patch. It should not go into 2.7, though, since it doesn't solve any problems in 2.7. If we get complaints about the -b option than we can add a work-around, but I doubt that we will. It would be good if you could add a test case for this, since without -b support, the function won't give an error: it will simply use the defaults.

STINNER Victor wrote:
> 
> STINNER Victor <[email protected]> added the comment:
> 
> @r.david.murray, @lemburg: So, can I commit my patch?

Yes, go ahead with 3.2 patch. It should not go into 2.7, though,
since it doesn't solve any problems in 2.7.

If we get complaints about the -b option than we can add a work-around,
but I doubt that we will. It would be good if you could add a test
case for this, since without -b support, the function won't give
an error: it will simply use the defaults.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2010-08-13 14:54:30	lemburg	set	recipients: + lemburg, pitrou, vstinner, eric.araujo, r.david.murray
2010-08-13 14:54:29	lemburg	link	issue9560 messages
2010-08-13 14:54:28	lemburg	create