Message 118954 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	pitrou
Recipients	belopolsky, casevh, georg.brandl, jimjjewett, ked-tao, loewis, mark.dickinson, pitrou, rhettinger, skip.montanaro, tim.peters
Date	2010-10-17.17:50:42
SpamBayes Score	0.00018027928
Marked as misclassified	No
Message-id	<[email protected]>
In-reply-to	<[email protected]>

Content
Le dimanche 17 octobre 2010 à 17:40 +0000, Martin v. Löwis a écrit : > Martin v. Löwis <[email protected]> added the comment: > > > The issue Raymond raised is the potential impossibility of making the > > change /after/ we settle on a stable ABI. The question is whether the > > ABI will be enforced starting from 3.2, or from a later date. > > I'd like to repeat that it will not be impossible to fix this after the > ABI is in place. At the cost of very annoying complications, though.

Le dimanche 17 octobre 2010 à 17:40 +0000, Martin v. Löwis a écrit :
> Martin v. Löwis <[email protected]> added the comment:
> 
> > The issue Raymond raised is the potential impossibility of making the
> > change /after/ we settle on a stable ABI. The question is whether the
> > ABI will be enforced starting from 3.2, or from a later date.
> 
> I'd like to repeat that it will not be impossible to fix this after the
> ABI is in place.

At the cost of very annoying complications, though.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2010-10-17 17:50:46	pitrou	set	recipients: + pitrou, tim.peters, loewis, skip.montanaro, georg.brandl, rhettinger, jimjjewett, mark.dickinson, belopolsky, casevh, ked-tao
2010-10-17 17:50:44	pitrou	link	issue9778 messages
2010-10-17 17:50:42	pitrou	create