Message171005
Ah: nice catch, Larry.
I would say that the obmalloc case *shouldn't* be permissible; however, it's already there, and changing that would be an involved task that would also likely risk introducing new bugs. So I guess practicality beats purity on that one. I don't see that as an excuse for introducing *new* undefined behaviour though, especially for a small optimization. |
|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2012-09-22 16:30:33 | mark.dickinson | set | recipients:
+ mark.dickinson, loewis, rhettinger, amaury.forgeotdarc, pitrou, vstinner, larry, eric.smith, stutzbach, asvetlov, meador.inge, xuanji, sdaoden, serhiy.storchaka |
| 2012-09-22 16:30:33 | mark.dickinson | set | messageid: <[email protected]> |
| 2012-09-22 16:30:32 | mark.dickinson | link | issue10044 messages |
| 2012-09-22 16:30:32 | mark.dickinson | create | |
|