Message 196713 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	neologix
Recipients	neologix, pitrou, rhettinger, tim.peters, vstinner
Date	2013-09-01.07:30:38
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<[email protected]>
In-reply-to

Content
> Please don't FUD this one to death. Aligned memory access is > sometimes important and we currently have no straight-forward > way to achieve it. I guess that a simple way to cut the discussion short would be to have a first implementation, and run some benchmarks to measure the benefits. I can certainly see the benefit of cacheline-aligned data structures in multithreaded code (to avoid false sharing/cacheline bouncing): I'm really curious to see how much this would benefit in a single-threaded workload.

> Please don't FUD this one to death.  Aligned memory access is
> sometimes important and we currently have no straight-forward
> way to achieve it.

I guess that a simple way to cut the discussion short would be to have a first implementation, and run some benchmarks to measure the benefits.

I can certainly see the benefit of cacheline-aligned data structures in multithreaded code (to avoid false sharing/cacheline bouncing): I'm really curious to see how much this would benefit in a single-threaded workload.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2013-09-01 07:30:38	neologix	set	recipients: + neologix, tim.peters, rhettinger, pitrou, vstinner
2013-09-01 07:30:38	neologix	set	messageid: <[email protected]>
2013-09-01 07:30:38	neologix	link	issue18835 messages
2013-09-01 07:30:38	neologix	create