➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author tim.golden
Recipients ivan.radic, r.david.murray, tim.golden, zach.ware
Date 2013-11-18.19:32:45
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <[email protected]>
In-reply-to <[email protected]>
Content 
TBH I'm still fairly -0 and edging towards -0.5. If we didn't already 
have two keyword args I might be convinced towards a jfdi=True flag. 
But, as the OP described, the current params already allow for a 
workaround of sorts and another param of the semantics we're discussing 
would surely just be confusing?

(Or you could just "preprocess" on Windows, eg attrib -r /s)
History
Date User Action Args
2013-11-18 19:32:45tim.goldensetrecipients: + tim.golden, r.david.murray, zach.ware, ivan.radic
2013-11-18 19:32:45tim.goldenlinkissue19643 messages
2013-11-18 19:32:45tim.goldencreate