➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author dstufft
Recipients Arfrever, alex, benjamin.peterson, christian.heimes, dstufft, ezio.melotti, lemburg, ncoghlan, pitrou, r.david.murray, vstinner
Date 2014-03-21.00:35:29
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <[email protected]>
In-reply-to
Content 
> Again: the point is maintenance later, not breakage now.

Ok, well I don't agree that it's more maintenance later to be explicit and not include HIGH, but whatever it's not insecure at the moment so.

Attached is a patch against 3.5 for folks to review.
History
Date User Action Args
2014-03-21 00:35:29dstufftsetrecipients: + dstufft, lemburg, ncoghlan, pitrou, vstinner, christian.heimes, benjamin.peterson, ezio.melotti, Arfrever, alex, r.david.murray
2014-03-21 00:35:29dstufftsetmessageid: <[email protected]>
2014-03-21 00:35:29dstufftlinkissue20995 messages
2014-03-21 00:35:29dstufftcreate