➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author rhettinger
Recipients benjamin.peterson, brett.cannon, methane, ncoghlan, pitrou, rhettinger, serhiy.storchaka, yselivanov
Date 2018-01-03.21:03:18
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <[email protected]>
In-reply-to
Content 
> This is a step to getting rid of the peepholer.

There is no goal to get rid of the peepholer optimizer.  Please don't invent this as a requirement.

If some optimization are more easily performed upstream, then go ahead and move them upstream.  The goal is to have a net reduction in complexity, not just the elimination of peephole.c just because you decided it should disappear.
History
Date User Action Args
2018-01-03 21:03:18rhettingersetrecipients: + rhettinger, brett.cannon, ncoghlan, pitrou, benjamin.peterson, methane, serhiy.storchaka, yselivanov
2018-01-03 21:03:18rhettingersetmessageid: <[email protected]>
2018-01-03 21:03:18rhettingerlinkissue32477 messages
2018-01-03 21:03:18rhettingercreate