Message 329402 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	gvanrossum
Recipients	BNMetrics, gvanrossum, pablogsal, pekka.klarck, xtreak
Date	2018-11-07.03:29:24
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<[email protected]>
In-reply-to

Content
Since this is how it works since 3.6, I think it's reasonable to make this part of the spec. For dictionary order we waited a release between implementing it that way and making it part of the spec; effectively we've already waited two releases (3.6 and 3.7) for this. So I say let's do it. This isn't something that's PEP-worthy anyway.

Since this is how it works since 3.6, I think it's reasonable to make this part of the spec. For dictionary order we waited a release between implementing it that way and making it part of the spec; effectively we've already waited two releases (3.6 and 3.7) for this. So I say let's do it. This isn't something that's PEP-worthy anyway.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2018-11-07 03:29:25	gvanrossum	set	recipients: + gvanrossum, pekka.klarck, pablogsal, xtreak, BNMetrics
2018-11-07 03:29:24	gvanrossum	set	messageid: <[email protected]>
2018-11-07 03:29:24	gvanrossum	link	issue34805 messages
2018-11-07 03:29:24	gvanrossum	create