Message 339613 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	methane
Recipients	Aaron Hall, anthony shaw, methane, ncoghlan, ronaldoussoren, serhiy.storchaka
Date	2019-04-08.11:20:11
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<[email protected]>
In-reply-to

Content
I agree with Serhiy. Benefit seems too small to add new opcode. > I could seek another way of implementing the same behaviour without an additional opcode? How about converting `[x for x in it]` to `[*it]` in AST?

I agree with Serhiy.  Benefit seems too small to add new opcode.

> I could seek another way of implementing the same behaviour without an additional opcode?

How about converting `[x for x in it]` to `[*it]` in AST?

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2019-04-08 11:20:11	methane	set	recipients: + methane, ronaldoussoren, ncoghlan, serhiy.storchaka, Aaron Hall, anthony shaw
2019-04-08 11:20:11	methane	set	messageid: <[email protected]>
2019-04-08 11:20:11	methane	link	issue36551 messages
2019-04-08 11:20:11	methane	create