Message 357281 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	vstinner
Recipients	Mark.Shannon, brett.cannon, dino.viehland, eric.snow, fabioz, gregory.p.smith, vstinner
Date	2019-11-22.13:39:33
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<[email protected]>
In-reply-to

Content
New question: if we add a public API to Python 3.8.1, would it make sense to directly change eval_frame type to add a new "tstate" parameter? See bpo-38818 for the rationale. I already proposed a change for the master branch: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/17187 Maybe I should combine PR 17340 (add PyInterpreterState_SetEvalFrameFunc()) with PR 17187 (add tstate parameter).

New question: if we add a public API to Python 3.8.1, would it make sense to directly change eval_frame type to add a new "tstate" parameter? See bpo-38818 for the rationale.

I already proposed a change for the master branch: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/17187

Maybe I should combine PR 17340 (add PyInterpreterState_SetEvalFrameFunc()) with PR 17187 (add tstate parameter).

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2019-11-22 13:39:33	vstinner	set	recipients: + vstinner, brett.cannon, gregory.p.smith, fabioz, dino.viehland, Mark.Shannon, eric.snow
2019-11-22 13:39:33	vstinner	set	messageid: <[email protected]>
2019-11-22 13:39:33	vstinner	link	issue38500 messages
2019-11-22 13:39:33	vstinner	create