Message 367487 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	aeros
Recipients	aeros, pitrou, vstinner
Date	2020-04-28.03:16:42
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<[email protected]>
In-reply-to

Content
After writing the above out and a bit of further consideration, I think it might make more sense to wait for the event after setting `self._closed = True` so that it prevents future wakeup() and clear() calls from reading/writing to the pipe, while still allowing ones that are currently ongoing to finish. Thoughts?

After writing the above out and a bit of further consideration, I think it might make more sense to wait for the event after setting `self._closed = True` so that it prevents future wakeup() and clear() calls from reading/writing to the pipe, while still allowing ones that are currently ongoing to finish.

Thoughts?

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2020-04-28 03:16:43	aeros	set	recipients: + aeros, pitrou, vstinner
2020-04-28 03:16:43	aeros	set	messageid: <[email protected]>
2020-04-28 03:16:43	aeros	link	issue39995 messages
2020-04-28 03:16:42	aeros	create