Message 393463 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	Mark.Shannon
Recipients	Dennis Sweeney, Guido.van.Rossum, Mark.Shannon, Yonatan Goldschmidt, ammar2, chris.jerdonek, corona10, erlendaasland, gvanrossum, hauntsaninja, pablogsal, petr.viktorin, rhettinger, serhiy.storchaka
Date	2021-05-11.14:37:24
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<[email protected]>
In-reply-to

Content
It is very little effort to add back the old function, so that isn't the problem. It won't work properly, but it never did anyway. So I guess that's sort of compatible. Maybe the best thing is to put a big red warning in the docs and hope that warns away people from using it?

It is very little effort to add back the old function, so that isn't the problem. It won't work properly, but it never did anyway. So I guess that's sort of compatible.

Maybe the best thing is to put a big red warning in the docs and hope that warns away people from using it?

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2021-05-11 14:37:24	Mark.Shannon	set	recipients: + Mark.Shannon, gvanrossum, rhettinger, petr.viktorin, chris.jerdonek, serhiy.storchaka, Guido.van.Rossum, ammar2, corona10, pablogsal, Dennis Sweeney, erlendaasland, Yonatan Goldschmidt, hauntsaninja
2021-05-11 14:37:24	Mark.Shannon	set	messageid: <[email protected]>
2021-05-11 14:37:24	Mark.Shannon	link	issue40222 messages
2021-05-11 14:37:24	Mark.Shannon	create