Message 65710 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	hdiogenes
Recipients	georg.brandl, hdiogenes
Date	2008-04-24.06:47:16
SpamBayes Score	0.018126134
Marked as misclassified	No
Message-id	<[email protected]>
In-reply-to

Content
It looks like there are no automated tests for pydoc; it's even listed in test_sundry.py. There's only one file Lib/test/pydocfodder.py which defines "Something just to look at via pydoc", but isn't used anywhere (I grepped and found nothing). I've attached a patch just to document one point where pydoc behavior differs from 2.5 to 3.0: describe() used to return 'instance of ClassX', now it returns only 'ClassX' (which means this test will pass in 2.5 but not in 3.0). Functions main and test_main were copied from test_modulefinder.

It looks like there are no automated tests for pydoc; it's even listed in test_sundry.py.

There's only one file Lib/test/pydocfodder.py which defines "Something just to look at 
via pydoc", but isn't used anywhere (I grepped and found nothing).

I've attached a patch just to document one point where pydoc behavior differs from 2.5 to 
3.0: describe() used to return 'instance of ClassX', now it returns only 'ClassX' (which 
means this test will pass in 2.5 but not in 3.0).

Functions main and test_main were copied from test_modulefinder.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2008-04-24 06:47:21	hdiogenes	set	spambayes_score: 0.0181261 -> 0.018126134 recipients: + hdiogenes, georg.brandl
2008-04-24 06:47:20	hdiogenes	set	spambayes_score: 0.0181261 -> 0.0181261 messageid: <[email protected]>
2008-04-24 06:47:19	hdiogenes	link	issue1883 messages
2008-04-24 06:47:18	hdiogenes	create