Message 68866 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	ncoghlan
Recipients	amaury.forgeotdarc, barry, eikeon, glyph, gvanrossum, jek, ncoghlan, rhettinger, schmir
Date	2008-06-28.00:56:15
SpamBayes Score	0.016434021
Marked as misclassified	No
Message-id	<[email protected]>
In-reply-to

Content
The _new__/__init__ stuff showed up on my diff as well (obviously) - that seemed to be doing a pretty good job of maintaining backwards compatibility. I'll dig into this further today and tomorrow - I'll probably start by reverting the relevant code back to exactly what is in 2.5, and then see how far I can get with adding the warning code back in while still keeping jek's test case working correctly.

The _new__/__init__ stuff showed up on my diff as well (obviously) -
that seemed to be doing a pretty good job of maintaining backwards
compatibility.

I'll dig into this further today and tomorrow - I'll probably start by
reverting the relevant code back to exactly what is in 2.5, and then see
how far I can get with adding the warning code back in while still
keeping jek's test case working correctly.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2008-06-28 00:56:19	ncoghlan	set	spambayes_score: 0.016434 -> 0.016434021 recipients: + ncoghlan, gvanrossum, barry, rhettinger, amaury.forgeotdarc, schmir, jek, eikeon, glyph
2008-06-28 00:56:18	ncoghlan	set	spambayes_score: 0.016434 -> 0.016434 messageid: <[email protected]>
2008-06-28 00:56:16	ncoghlan	link	issue2235 messages
2008-06-28 00:56:15	ncoghlan	create