Message 69286 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	pitrou
Recipients	amaury.forgeotdarc, giampaolo.rodola, gpolo, pitrou
Date	2008-07-05.18:35:47
SpamBayes Score	0.012072028
Marked as misclassified	No
Message-id	<[email protected]>
In-reply-to

Content
If I try to follow the chain the consequences: - all PyArg_ParseTuple("s#") calls that release the GIL afterwards should be re-written to use another API (which one I don't know exactly, but hopefully the appropriate functions are already provided by the buffer API); this applies to third-party extension modules as well - consequently, forward compatibility is broken in an important way (but it would probably be ok for py3k) - perhaps the bytearray type should not have been backported to 2.6, or perhaps it should carry a big warning in the documentation

If I try to follow the chain the consequences:
 - all PyArg_ParseTuple("s#") calls that release the GIL afterwards
should be re-written to use another API (which one I don't know exactly,
but hopefully the appropriate functions are already provided by the
buffer API); this applies to third-party extension modules as well
 - consequently, forward compatibility is broken in an important way
(but it would probably be ok for py3k)
 - perhaps the bytearray type should not have been backported to 2.6, or
perhaps it should carry a big warning in the documentation

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2008-07-05 18:35:49	pitrou	set	spambayes_score: 0.012072 -> 0.012072028 recipients: + pitrou, amaury.forgeotdarc, giampaolo.rodola, gpolo
2008-07-05 18:35:49	pitrou	set	spambayes_score: 0.012072 -> 0.012072 messageid: <[email protected]>
2008-07-05 18:35:48	pitrou	link	issue3139 messages
2008-07-05 18:35:47	pitrou	create