Message 69662 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	rhettinger
Recipients	benjamin.peterson, cito, mishok13, rhettinger
Date	2008-07-14.21:44:21
SpamBayes Score	0.019328665
Marked as misclassified	No
Message-id	<[email protected]>
In-reply-to

Content
I think this is closer to a language wide change and should probably be addressed for 2.7 and 3.1. It would be great to change the C argument parsing API to make its error messages more specific. For Py2.6, I think things are fine as it stands. This isn't a bug (tests pass, it matches results from previous pythons, etc) Reclassifying as a feature request for improved error reports for the argument parsing API.

I think this is closer to a language wide change and should probably be 
addressed for 2.7 and 3.1.  It would be great to change the C argument 
parsing API to make its error messages more specific.

For Py2.6, I think things are fine as it stands.  This isn't a bug 
(tests pass, it matches results from previous pythons, etc)  
Reclassifying as a feature request for improved error reports for the 
argument parsing API.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2008-07-14 21:44:23	rhettinger	set	spambayes_score: 0.0193287 -> 0.019328665 recipients: + rhettinger, cito, benjamin.peterson, mishok13
2008-07-14 21:44:23	rhettinger	set	spambayes_score: 0.0193287 -> 0.0193287 messageid: <[email protected]>
2008-07-14 21:44:22	rhettinger	link	issue3354 messages
2008-07-14 21:44:22	rhettinger	create