Message 70134 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	collinwinter
Recipients	benjamin.peterson, collinwinter, georg.brandl, rbp, rhettinger
Date	2008-07-22.04:04:36
SpamBayes Score	0.20796692
Marked as misclassified	No
Message-id	<[email protected]>
In-reply-to

Content
I think the proper way to address this is via the confidence levels that Rodrigo Bernardo Pimentel is adding for his Summer of Code project. The idea is that you'll be able to say "let me inspect any changes where the fixer is less than X% confident". fix_dict and for loops would be one such place. Until that mechanism is in place, I agree with Raymond that we should err on the side of correctness.

I think the proper way to address this is via the confidence levels that
Rodrigo Bernardo Pimentel is adding for his Summer of Code project. The
idea is that you'll be able to say "let me inspect any changes where the
fixer is less than X% confident". fix_dict and for loops would be one
such place.

Until that mechanism is in place, I agree with Raymond that we should
err on the side of correctness.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2008-07-22 04:04:40	collinwinter	set	spambayes_score: 0.207967 -> 0.20796692 recipients: + collinwinter, georg.brandl, rhettinger, benjamin.peterson, rbp
2008-07-22 04:04:39	collinwinter	set	spambayes_score: 0.207967 -> 0.207967 messageid: <[email protected]>
2008-07-22 04:04:38	collinwinter	link	issue3417 messages
2008-07-22 04:04:37	collinwinter	create