Message 71424 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	ncoghlan
Recipients	barry, benjamin.peterson, jnoller, mishok13, ncoghlan
Date	2008-08-19.15:34:55
SpamBayes Score	0.001304957
Marked as misclassified	No
Message-id	<[email protected]>
In-reply-to

Content
is_alive appears to be a potentially expensive check for the multiprocessing side of things, which is why I'm inclined to leave it as a method. "if t.is_alive():" actually reads better to me than "if t.alive:" anyway.

is_alive appears to be a potentially expensive check for the
multiprocessing side of things, which is why I'm inclined to leave it as
a method. "if t.is_alive():" actually reads better to me than "if
t.alive:" anyway.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2008-08-19 15:34:56	ncoghlan	set	recipients: + ncoghlan, barry, benjamin.peterson, jnoller, mishok13
2008-08-19 15:34:56	ncoghlan	set	messageid: <[email protected]>
2008-08-19 15:34:55	ncoghlan	link	issue3352 messages
2008-08-19 15:34:55	ncoghlan	create