Message 80709 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	mark.dickinson
Recipients	amaury.forgeotdarc, benjamin.peterson, brett.cannon, christian.heimes, georg.brandl, gpolo, lemburg, mark.dickinson, pitrou, rhettinger
Date	2009-01-28.13:37:09
SpamBayes Score	0.00018149387
Marked as misclassified	No
Message-id	<[email protected]>
In-reply-to

Content
Thanks, Guilherme. > For this reason I would actually prefer to them not be comparable. That's fine with me, so long as we can be sure that there's no existing code that depends on them being comparable. I can't figure out whether there's any legitimate way that the tp_compare slot (which is currently implemented) of a PyTclObject could ever be called.

Thanks, Guilherme.

> For this reason I would actually prefer to them not be comparable.

That's fine with me, so long as we can be sure that there's no existing 
code that depends on them being comparable.  I can't figure out whether 
there's any legitimate way that the tp_compare slot (which is currently 
implemented) of a PyTclObject could ever be called.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2009-01-28 13:37:12	mark.dickinson	set	recipients: + mark.dickinson, lemburg, brett.cannon, georg.brandl, rhettinger, amaury.forgeotdarc, pitrou, christian.heimes, benjamin.peterson, gpolo
2009-01-28 13:37:11	mark.dickinson	set	messageid: <[email protected]>
2009-01-28 13:37:09	mark.dickinson	link	issue1717 messages
2009-01-28 13:37:09	mark.dickinson	create