Message82967
It is an artificial value, I don't require a recursion
limit so low in any application. I found it when
looking into #5370.
If there is a lower limit to sys.setrecursionlimit,
maybe it should be enforced. But since it fails only
the second time, it looks like a bug somewhere. |
|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2009-03-01 15:58:11 | ggenellina | set | recipients:
+ ggenellina, loewis, georg.brandl, pitrou |
| 2009-03-01 15:58:10 | ggenellina | set | messageid: <[email protected]> |
| 2009-03-01 15:58:09 | ggenellina | link | issue5392 messages |
| 2009-03-01 15:58:09 | ggenellina | create | |
|