Message 83678 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	ocean-city
Recipients	loewis, ocean-city, vstinner
Date	2009-03-17.13:39:56
SpamBayes Score	0.0002966683
Marked as misclassified	No
Message-id	<[email protected]>
In-reply-to

Content
>In the python-dev thread, most people agree to use bytes in mmap. Did >anyone reviewed the patch? Well, there is no conclusion which of your choices (a or b) is preferred. http://www.nabble.com/What-type-of-object-mmap.read_byte-should-return-on-py3k--tt22261245.html#a22261245 I opened similar issue for msvcrt in issue5410. >Can you commit it to py3k than then to the 3.0 branch? If the patch is acceptable, yes. This patch will change behavior of functions, I don't think I can commit this without review.

>In the python-dev thread, most people agree to use bytes in mmap. Did 
>anyone reviewed the patch?

Well, there is no conclusion which of your choices (a or b) is preferred.
http://www.nabble.com/What-type-of-object-mmap.read_byte-should-return-on-py3k--tt22261245.html#a22261245
I opened similar issue for msvcrt in issue5410.

>Can you commit it to py3k than then to the 3.0 branch?
If the patch is acceptable, yes. This patch will change behavior of
functions, I don't think I can commit this without review.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2009-03-17 13:39:59	ocean-city	set	recipients: + ocean-city, loewis, vstinner
2009-03-17 13:39:59	ocean-city	set	messageid: <[email protected]>
2009-03-17 13:39:57	ocean-city	link	issue5391 messages
2009-03-17 13:39:56	ocean-city	create