Conversation
Member
|
How do you run this code and what does it output? |
Contributor
Author
|
Currently I need to patch it a little ... but the idea is that the workflow is the following:
This works best for platform-independent tests. The limitations are:
|
7bb0496 to
4145bb4
Compare
Contributor
Author
|
Having a working #4072 is the blocking issue. |
youknowone
requested changes
Apr 24, 2025
Member
youknowone
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Please add the comment to the header of the script as documentation
157cf34 to
452e629
Compare
Contributor
Author
|
Done. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Working script to auto-mark rustpython failures.
Has a few limitations but should work in 90% of the cases.
Ideally I'd fix the class/subclass situation as well as proper ast parsing.