bpo-37834: Normalise handling of reparse points on Windows#15231
Merged
zooba merged 3 commits intopython:masterfrom Aug 21, 2019
Merged
bpo-37834: Normalise handling of reparse points on Windows#15231zooba merged 3 commits intopython:masterfrom
zooba merged 3 commits intopython:masterfrom
Conversation
zooba
added
type-bug
zooba
changed the title
eryksun
reviewed
Aug 15, 2019
eryksun
reviewed
Aug 15, 2019
eryksun
reviewed
Aug 15, 2019
eryksun
reviewed
Aug 20, 2019
| if (PyModule_AddObject(m, "IO_REPARSE_TAG_MOUNT_POINT", | ||
| PyLong_FromUnsignedLong(IO_REPARSE_TAG_MOUNT_POINT))) return NULL; | ||
| if (PyModule_AddObject(m, "IO_REPARSE_TAG_APPEXECLINK", | ||
| PyLong_FromUnsignedLong(IO_REPARSE_TAG_APPEXECLINK))) return NULL; |
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
IO_REPARSE_TAG_UNHANDLED (0x80000020), going by its name, is always an unhandled tag. IO_REPARSE_TAG_LX_SYMLINK (0xA000001D) should be an unhandled link tag, since it's used for symlinks between an NT file system and a WSL file system (e.g. "/mnt/c/etc" -> "/etc").
I looked over Microsoft's tags for a handled tag that's not a link, but nothing stands out. I thought that OneDrive used them (i.e. IO_REPARSE_TAG_CLOUD*), but that doesn't appear to be the case anymore. I also thought the new Projected File System support would use them (i.e. IO_REPARSE_TAG_PROJFS). I built the RegFS sample to try to confirm this, and I was surprised to find that none of the virtual directories and files (keys and values) was a reparse point.
However, both OneDrive and ProjFS do make extensive use of the following new file attributes:
FILE_ATTRIBUTE_PINNED 0x00080000
FILE_ATTRIBUTE_UNPINNED 0x00100000
FILE_ATTRIBUTE_RECALL_ON_OPEN 0x00040000
FILE_ATTRIBUTE_RECALL_ON_DATA_ACCESS 0x00400000
* ntpath.realpath() and nt.stat() will traverse all supported reparse points (previously was mixed)
* nt.lstat() will let the OS traverse reparse points that are not name surrogates (previously would not traverse any reparse point)
* nt.[l]stat() will only set S_IFLNK for symlinks (previous behaviour)
* nt.readlink() will read destinations for symlinks and junction points only
bpo-1311: os.path.exists('nul') now returns True on Windows
* nt.stat('nul').st_mode is now S_IFCHR (previously was an error)
zooba
changed the title
Contributor
|
Thanks @zooba for the PR 🌮🎉.. I'm working now to backport this PR to: 3.8. |
Contributor
|
Sorry, @zooba, I could not cleanly backport this to |
|
GH-15370 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.8 branch. |
lisroach
pushed a commit
to lisroach/cpython
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 10, 2019
…15231) bpo-37834: Normalise handling of reparse points on Windows * ntpath.realpath() and nt.stat() will traverse all supported reparse points (previously was mixed) * nt.lstat() will let the OS traverse reparse points that are not name surrogates (previously would not traverse any reparse point) * nt.[l]stat() will only set S_IFLNK for symlinks (previous behaviour) * nt.readlink() will read destinations for symlinks and junction points only bpo-1311: os.path.exists('nul') now returns True on Windows * nt.stat('nul').st_mode is now S_IFCHR (previously was an error)
DinoV
pushed a commit
to DinoV/cpython
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 14, 2020
…15231) bpo-37834: Normalise handling of reparse points on Windows * ntpath.realpath() and nt.stat() will traverse all supported reparse points (previously was mixed) * nt.lstat() will let the OS traverse reparse points that are not name surrogates (previously would not traverse any reparse point) * nt.[l]stat() will only set S_IFLNK for symlinks (previous behaviour) * nt.readlink() will read destinations for symlinks and junction points only bpo-1311: os.path.exists('nul') now returns True on Windows * nt.stat('nul').st_mode is now S_IFCHR (previously was an error)
websurfer5
pushed a commit
to websurfer5/cpython
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 20, 2020
…15231) bpo-37834: Normalise handling of reparse points on Windows * ntpath.realpath() and nt.stat() will traverse all supported reparse points (previously was mixed) * nt.lstat() will let the OS traverse reparse points that are not name surrogates (previously would not traverse any reparse point) * nt.[l]stat() will only set S_IFLNK for symlinks (previous behaviour) * nt.readlink() will read destinations for symlinks and junction points only bpo-1311: os.path.exists('nul') now returns True on Windows * nt.stat('nul').st_mode is now S_IFCHR (previously was an error)
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
5 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
https://bugs.python.org/issue37834