I think it is better to remove PYCC_VACPP in a separate commit.

OS/2 support was removed in bpo-16135.

I think it is better to remove PYCC_VACPP in a separate commit.

I agree, it's distributing to have both changes in the same PR.

Moreover, for the Cygwin PR, please explain your change in the commit message. Explain that your change adds the ioctl.h include on Cygwin.

It is in a separate commit, but the same PR. I will make a separate PR--it just seemed like very minor code cleanup.

Rebased: Dropped the PYCC_VACPP cleanup from this PR; the commit message already says I think all that needs to be said.

Thanks!

Thanks @embray for the PR, and @serhiy-storchaka for merging it 🌮🎉.. I'm working now to backport this PR to: 3.6.
🐍🍒⛏🤖

GH-4145 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.6 branch.

GH-4145 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.6 branch.

Wait. For me, Cygwin means supporting a new platform. It was never supported officially. I'm against backporting such change.

"It is in a separate commit, but the same PR. I will make a separate PR--it just seemed like very minor code cleanup."

Please CC-me for your new "cleanup" PR, I like it ;-)

Thanks @embray for the PR, and @serhiy-storchaka for merging it 🌮🎉.. I'm working now to backport this PR to: 2.7.
🐍🍒⛏🤖

Sorry, @embray and @serhiy-storchaka, I could not cleanly backport this to 2.7 due to a conflict.
Please backport using cherry_picker on command line.
cherry_picker 63ae04461fb0cc93ca57cd151103a8dd295581d6 2.7