trying to address perf regression #150056
Draft
+20
−20
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
rustbot
added
S-waiting-on-author
Member
Author
|
@rust-timer build 9124eca |
Member
Author
|
@Kobzol how do i run this |
Member
|
@bors try @rust-timer queue |
Collaborator
|
This pull request is already queued and waiting for a try build to finish. |
|
⌛ Trying commit 9124eca with merge 48c5d38… To cancel the try build, run the command Workflow: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/actions/runs/20276512327 |
rust-bors bot
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 16, 2025
trying to address perf regression
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
the only thing that has changed that I hide all these calls to get the return type, so we won't call it every time we encounter a function, there is still room to put it even further in checks and make it stricter but let's try it as it is first
follow up on #149664