IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/pra/mprapa/126563.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Institutional Quality as an Antidote to the Environmental Resource Curse: Evidence from COâ‚‚ Emissions in MENA Economies

Author

Listed:
  • Mabrouki, Mohamed

Abstract

This study examines the complex relationships between institutional quality, natural capital, and COâ‚‚ emissions in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region from 2000 to 2022. Using a comprehensive panel dataset across 10 MENA countries, we employ robust econometric techniques including fixed effects models in levels and first-differences, and system GMM estimators to address endogeneity and dynamic persistence. Our diagnostic framework incorporates tests for cross-sectional dependence, slope heterogeneity, and cointegration, revealing the absence of long-run equilibrium relationships in the region. The empirical results demonstrate that economic growth (0.48-0.60 elasticity), population pressure (0.73-0.95 elasticity), and investment patterns (0.05-0.09 elasticity) remain primary drivers of COâ‚‚ emissions. Natural capital exhibits a significant positive relationship with emissions (0.11-0.29 elasticity), supporting the environmental resource curse hypothesis. Institutional quality shows a mitigating effect on emissions, though this relationship is complex and operates primarily through long-term channels. The absence of cointegration challenges conventional Environmental Kuznets Curve frameworks and underscores the region's environmental and economic instability. These findings highlight the urgent need for integrated policy approaches combining economic diversification, institutional reforms, and sustainable natural resource management to facilitate climate adaptation in this vulnerable region.

Suggested Citation

  • Mabrouki, Mohamed, 2025. "Institutional Quality as an Antidote to the Environmental Resource Curse: Evidence from COâ‚‚ Emissions in MENA Economies," MPRA Paper 126563, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    • Handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:126563
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/126563/1/MPRA_paper_126563.pdf
    File Function: original version
    Download Restriction: no
    --->

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • O57 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economywide Country Studies - - - Comparative Studies of Countries

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:126563. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joachim Winter (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/vfmunde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.