There are a number of API that are exposed via REST but not via the Transport Client. They don't necessarily have to be implemented if the goal is feature parity with the Transport Client, yet we should probably have a look at why they were not added to the Transport Client and whether it makes sense to add their support to the high-level REST Client or not. I don't think it makes sense to add sup

We've defined our custom filters (javax.servlet.Filter) through @Beans in a @Configuration class. Something like:

@Configuration
public class MyWebMvcConfigurer implements WebMvcConfigurer {
    ...
    @Bean @Order(200)
    public Filter1 filter1() {
        return new Filter1();
    }
    @Bean @Order(100)
    public Filter2 filter2() {
        return new Filter2();
    }

Many code changes in 3.x can be done independently, but updating the new What's Different in 3.x.md would conflict. This issue tracks which changes should be eventually described in the file:

• Introduction of the Supplier interface -> #6511
• Callable use changed to Supplier in the API -> #6511
• Removal of getValues() from various subjects and processors -> #6516
• [

Stuff like:

• HTTP caching heuristics source?
• what it means if cacheResponse() and networkResponse() are both non-null (issue #4539)
• why you need to read the entire response before an entry is stored
• the cache must not compete with other processes for the same directory
• pruning the cache manually

When Retrofit2 returns okhttp3.ResponseBody then it has to be closed in order to avoid memory leaks, right? It's something what I have just noticed in our code and am not sure.

@GET("accountId")
@WorkerThread
Call<ResponseBody> getUserData(@Header(NetworkConstants.Header.AUTHORIZATION) String accessToken);

...
Response<ResponseBody> response = interface.getUserData();
// do something 

英雄招募

成为 Doocs 项目维护者

本项目 advanced-java，包括 Doocs 开源组织下的所有项目，都欢迎各位朋友参与完善。

如果你提交的内容有价值，且具备规范性，将有机会提升为项目的维护者，直接参与项目的 review、merge 等维护工作，提交内容时也可以直接 push 到 doocs/advanced-java 主分支 master 下，无须提交 PR 等待 review。

目前 advanced-java 只有 [yanglbme](http

Version: 2.0.0-beta3

Suggestions:
During running LeakCanary against an app, I occasionally see the following notification.
1 retained objects, tap to dump heap
App visible, waiting until retained objects

When I exit the app, a new notification suggesting the retained object is garbage collected.

From what I gather, it seems to mean LeakCanary find objects that might or

给你两个数组，arr1 和 arr2，

arr2 中的元素各不相同
arr2 中的每个元素都出现在 arr1 中
对 arr1 中的元素进行排序，使 arr1 中项的相对顺序和 arr2 中的相对顺序相同。未在 arr2 中出现过的元素需要按照升序放在 arr1 的末尾。

示例：

输入：arr1 = [2,3,1,3,2,4,6,7,9,2,19], arr2 = [2,1,4,3,9,6]
输出：[2,2,2,1,4,3,3,9,6,7,19]
 

提示：

arr1.length, arr2.length <= 1000
0 <= arr1[i], arr2[i] <= 1000
arr2 中的元素 arr2[i] 各不相同
arr2 中的每个元素 arr2[i] 都出现在 arr1 中

来源：力扣（LeetCode）
链接：

Issue details

While in a LibGDX environment if you press down a key and then switch to any window outside of LibGDX's scope and release that key, the LibGDX environment does not detect that release event.

Upon re-entry to the LibGDX environment, there should probably be some re-polling evaluation of the keys LibGDX thinks are pressed keys to determine if they are still pressed or not.

There is an error in the main usage example offered at https://seleniumhq.github.io/selenium/docs/api/javascript/index.html

const {Builder, By, Key, until} = require('selenium-webdriver');

(async function example() {
  let driver = await new Builder().forBrowser('firefox').build();
  try {
    await driver.get('http://www.google.com/ncr');
    await driver.findElement(By.n

Overview of the feature request

We should add the spring no-http plugin to make sure we (and our users) do not use http repositories by accident in maven or gradle builds. If it works well we can extend the use to e.g. production code.

I will take care of it. It worked pretty well for gradle but there were some problems with the maven checkstyle integration.

**Motivation f