New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix(compiler-cli): downlevel angular decorators to static properties #37382
fix(compiler-cli): downlevel angular decorators to static properties #37382
Conversation
20b80f2
to
787a42e
Compare
9fcff60
to
f533ee8
Compare
|
@alxhub @IgorMinar I marked this as |
f533ee8
to
d884e61
Compare
|
I think it’s best that this goes in v10, because otherwise we’ll be unable to remove this logic from ng-packagr and CLI until v11, that’s because ng-packagr and CLI are typically compatible for a particular major version of the framework. Note: the transformer needs to be added as part of the public api, because in the CLI this transformer is only used when using JIT mode, which in CLI happens via TSC. |
|
@alan-agius4 Yeah, we chatted about that being exposed. I wonder how we can do that as compiler code never is public API as per |
|
Since the compiler code is not bundled we can opt to use deep imports in this case. |
Overall this looks really really good @devversion!
I left a few comments and I'm going to rely on @alxhub's review of the transformer code itself(I skipped that part during this review pass).
The biggest sticking point for me is emitDecoratorMetadata- see my longer comment about that.
With regards to your comment about "master-only" vs "master&patch". I think that we should get this in v10 to enable simplification of the downstream tooling as soon as possible. So please relabel the PR.
Lastly, and I'm very hesitant to even suggest it this late in the RC, but I do have to bring it up because otherwise we'll have to go through more churn and migrations: how about we rename .decorators and ctorParams to ɵdec and ɵctor (or something similar prefixed with ɵ). The goal of this would be to ensure that these props are clearly marked as private APIs and that we follow the same conventions for these apis as we do elsewhere.
The property name change needs more discussion, so please do not act on it, but think about it and we can discuss it during the FW sync meeting.
(one known downstream change that would need to happen as a result of this renaming would be to update the CLI/build-optimizer passes to look for both the old and new property names, @alan-agius4 could weigh in on how difficult that would be and if there is more to it than an extra property lookup in AST)
|
The presubmit in google3 seems to be failing, @alxhub can confirm but at the surface it seems that g3 expects that ngc-wrapped enables example error: The error comes from the closure compiler that tries to process JS code emitted by ngc (VE). The error looks like an issue with the emit that causes TS to emit code while ommitting some of the imports needed for it. I recall seeing an issue about this tsickle or typescript issue tracker but I can't find it right now. I believe that turning on the |
|
Thinking more about the property renaming. I think it's too risky at this point. Let's not get distracted with that and schedule it for v11. |
|
Renaming the props is not a big change from the CLI POV, I think the framework will be impacted more, because the compiler & ngcc will need to be aware of these new annotations for decorators. Currently the compiler/cli/ngcc can process/reflect decorators that are either emitted either by tsickle or TypeScript. |
a1d86d7
to
d158731
Compare
cdfd61e
to
9d6c343
Compare
| @@ -611,7 +611,7 @@ let MyService = /** @class */ (() => { | |||
| return MyService; | |||
| })(); | |||
| export { MyService }; | |||
| //# sourceMappingURL=data:application/json;base64,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 | |||
| //# sourceMappingURL=data:application/json;base64,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 | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Note for reviewer: You might wonder why this commit changed the source map. This is because before this commit, the actual parameter type identifier was used for ctorParameters. Now since we use the import alias though for ctorParameters, the source map will change back to what it was with tsickle too (except for the move of the factory and removal of @nocollapse).
LGTM with the fix for aliased constructor parameter names.
b76ec5f
to
7170363
Compare
In v7 of Angular we removed `tsickle` from the default `ngc` pipeline. This had the negative potential of breaking ES2015 output and SSR due to a limitation in TypeScript. TypeScript by default preserves type information for decorated constructor parameters when `emitDecoratorMetadata` is enabled. For example, consider this snippet below: ``` @directive() export class MyDirective { constructor(button: MyButton) {} } export class MyButton {} ``` TypeScript would generate metadata for the `MyDirective` class it has a decorator applied. This metadata would be needed in JIT mode, or for libraries that provide `MyDirective` through NPM. The metadata would look as followed: ``` let MyDirective = class MyDir {} MyDirective = __decorate([ Directive(), __metadata("design:paramtypes", [MyButton]), ], MyDirective); let MyButton = class MyButton {} ``` Notice that TypeScript generated calls to `__decorate` and `__metadata`. These calls are needed so that the Angular compiler is able to determine whether `MyDirective` is actually an directive, and what types are needed for dependency injection. The limitation surfaces in this concrete example because `MyButton` is declared after the `__metadata(..)` call, while `__metadata` actually directly references `MyButton`. This is illegal though because `MyButton` has not been declared at this point. This is due to the so-called temporal dead zone in JavaScript. Errors like followed will be reported at runtime when such file/code evaluates: ``` Uncaught ReferenceError: Cannot access 'MyButton' before initialization ``` As noted, this is a TypeScript limitation because ideally TypeScript shouldn't evaluate `__metadata`/reference `MyButton` immediately. Instead, it should defer the reference until `MyButton` is actually declared. This limitation will not be fixed by the TypeScript team though because it's a limitation as per current design and they will only revisit this once the tc39 decorator proposal is finalized (currently stage-2 at time of writing). Given this wontfix on the TypeScript side, and our heavy reliance on this metadata in libraries (and for JIT mode), we intend to fix this from within the Angular compiler by downleveling decorators to static properties that don't need to evaluate directly. For example: ``` MyDirective.ctorParameters = () => [MyButton]; ``` With this snippet above, `MyButton` is not referenced directly. Only lazily when the Angular runtime needs it. This mitigates the temporal dead zone issue caused by a limitation in TypeScript's decorator metadata output. See: microsoft/TypeScript#27519. In the past (as noted; before version 7), the Angular compiler by default used tsickle that already performed this transformation. We moved the transformation to the CLI for JIT and `ng-packager`, but now we realize that we can move this all to a single place in the compiler so that standalone ngc consumers can benefit too, and that we can disable tsickle in our Bazel `ngc-wrapped` pipeline (that currently still relies on tsickle to perform this decorator processing). This transformation also has another positive side-effect of making Angular application/library code more compatible with server-side rendering. In principle, TypeScript would also preserve type information for decorated class members (similar to how it did that for constructor parameters) at runtime. This becomes an issue when your application relies on native DOM globals for decorated class member types. e.g. ``` @input() panelElement: HTMLElement; ``` Your application code would then reference `HTMLElement` directly whenever the source file is loaded in NodeJS for SSR. `HTMLElement` does not exist on the server though, so that will become an invalid reference. One could work around this by providing global mocks for these DOM symbols, but that doesn't match up with other places where dependency injection is used for mocking DOM/browser specific symbols. More context in this issue: angular#30586. The TL;DR here is that the Angular compiler does not care about types for these class members, so it won't ever reference `HTMLElement` at runtime. Fixes angular#30106. Fixes angular#30586. Fixes angular#30141. Resolves FW-2196. Resolves FW-2199.
…erties Address feedback
…erties Use barrel imports
…erties Fix incorrect import reference with conflicting local parameter name
…erties Properly handle namespace imports resolving to non-value
7170363
to
f871ec3
Compare
…37382) In v7 of Angular we removed `tsickle` from the default `ngc` pipeline. This had the negative potential of breaking ES2015 output and SSR due to a limitation in TypeScript. TypeScript by default preserves type information for decorated constructor parameters when `emitDecoratorMetadata` is enabled. For example, consider this snippet below: ``` @directive() export class MyDirective { constructor(button: MyButton) {} } export class MyButton {} ``` TypeScript would generate metadata for the `MyDirective` class it has a decorator applied. This metadata would be needed in JIT mode, or for libraries that provide `MyDirective` through NPM. The metadata would look as followed: ``` let MyDirective = class MyDir {} MyDirective = __decorate([ Directive(), __metadata("design:paramtypes", [MyButton]), ], MyDirective); let MyButton = class MyButton {} ``` Notice that TypeScript generated calls to `__decorate` and `__metadata`. These calls are needed so that the Angular compiler is able to determine whether `MyDirective` is actually an directive, and what types are needed for dependency injection. The limitation surfaces in this concrete example because `MyButton` is declared after the `__metadata(..)` call, while `__metadata` actually directly references `MyButton`. This is illegal though because `MyButton` has not been declared at this point. This is due to the so-called temporal dead zone in JavaScript. Errors like followed will be reported at runtime when such file/code evaluates: ``` Uncaught ReferenceError: Cannot access 'MyButton' before initialization ``` As noted, this is a TypeScript limitation because ideally TypeScript shouldn't evaluate `__metadata`/reference `MyButton` immediately. Instead, it should defer the reference until `MyButton` is actually declared. This limitation will not be fixed by the TypeScript team though because it's a limitation as per current design and they will only revisit this once the tc39 decorator proposal is finalized (currently stage-2 at time of writing). Given this wontfix on the TypeScript side, and our heavy reliance on this metadata in libraries (and for JIT mode), we intend to fix this from within the Angular compiler by downleveling decorators to static properties that don't need to evaluate directly. For example: ``` MyDirective.ctorParameters = () => [MyButton]; ``` With this snippet above, `MyButton` is not referenced directly. Only lazily when the Angular runtime needs it. This mitigates the temporal dead zone issue caused by a limitation in TypeScript's decorator metadata output. See: microsoft/TypeScript#27519. In the past (as noted; before version 7), the Angular compiler by default used tsickle that already performed this transformation. We moved the transformation to the CLI for JIT and `ng-packager`, but now we realize that we can move this all to a single place in the compiler so that standalone ngc consumers can benefit too, and that we can disable tsickle in our Bazel `ngc-wrapped` pipeline (that currently still relies on tsickle to perform this decorator processing). This transformation also has another positive side-effect of making Angular application/library code more compatible with server-side rendering. In principle, TypeScript would also preserve type information for decorated class members (similar to how it did that for constructor parameters) at runtime. This becomes an issue when your application relies on native DOM globals for decorated class member types. e.g. ``` @input() panelElement: HTMLElement; ``` Your application code would then reference `HTMLElement` directly whenever the source file is loaded in NodeJS for SSR. `HTMLElement` does not exist on the server though, so that will become an invalid reference. One could work around this by providing global mocks for these DOM symbols, but that doesn't match up with other places where dependency injection is used for mocking DOM/browser specific symbols. More context in this issue: #30586. The TL;DR here is that the Angular compiler does not care about types for these class members, so it won't ever reference `HTMLElement` at runtime. Fixes #30106. Fixes #30586. Fixes #30141. Resolves FW-2196. Resolves FW-2199. PR Close #37382
…ngular#37382) In v7 of Angular we removed `tsickle` from the default `ngc` pipeline. This had the negative potential of breaking ES2015 output and SSR due to a limitation in TypeScript. TypeScript by default preserves type information for decorated constructor parameters when `emitDecoratorMetadata` is enabled. For example, consider this snippet below: ``` @directive() export class MyDirective { constructor(button: MyButton) {} } export class MyButton {} ``` TypeScript would generate metadata for the `MyDirective` class it has a decorator applied. This metadata would be needed in JIT mode, or for libraries that provide `MyDirective` through NPM. The metadata would look as followed: ``` let MyDirective = class MyDir {} MyDirective = __decorate([ Directive(), __metadata("design:paramtypes", [MyButton]), ], MyDirective); let MyButton = class MyButton {} ``` Notice that TypeScript generated calls to `__decorate` and `__metadata`. These calls are needed so that the Angular compiler is able to determine whether `MyDirective` is actually an directive, and what types are needed for dependency injection. The limitation surfaces in this concrete example because `MyButton` is declared after the `__metadata(..)` call, while `__metadata` actually directly references `MyButton`. This is illegal though because `MyButton` has not been declared at this point. This is due to the so-called temporal dead zone in JavaScript. Errors like followed will be reported at runtime when such file/code evaluates: ``` Uncaught ReferenceError: Cannot access 'MyButton' before initialization ``` As noted, this is a TypeScript limitation because ideally TypeScript shouldn't evaluate `__metadata`/reference `MyButton` immediately. Instead, it should defer the reference until `MyButton` is actually declared. This limitation will not be fixed by the TypeScript team though because it's a limitation as per current design and they will only revisit this once the tc39 decorator proposal is finalized (currently stage-2 at time of writing). Given this wontfix on the TypeScript side, and our heavy reliance on this metadata in libraries (and for JIT mode), we intend to fix this from within the Angular compiler by downleveling decorators to static properties that don't need to evaluate directly. For example: ``` MyDirective.ctorParameters = () => [MyButton]; ``` With this snippet above, `MyButton` is not referenced directly. Only lazily when the Angular runtime needs it. This mitigates the temporal dead zone issue caused by a limitation in TypeScript's decorator metadata output. See: microsoft/TypeScript#27519. In the past (as noted; before version 7), the Angular compiler by default used tsickle that already performed this transformation. We moved the transformation to the CLI for JIT and `ng-packager`, but now we realize that we can move this all to a single place in the compiler so that standalone ngc consumers can benefit too, and that we can disable tsickle in our Bazel `ngc-wrapped` pipeline (that currently still relies on tsickle to perform this decorator processing). This transformation also has another positive side-effect of making Angular application/library code more compatible with server-side rendering. In principle, TypeScript would also preserve type information for decorated class members (similar to how it did that for constructor parameters) at runtime. This becomes an issue when your application relies on native DOM globals for decorated class member types. e.g. ``` @input() panelElement: HTMLElement; ``` Your application code would then reference `HTMLElement` directly whenever the source file is loaded in NodeJS for SSR. `HTMLElement` does not exist on the server though, so that will become an invalid reference. One could work around this by providing global mocks for these DOM symbols, but that doesn't match up with other places where dependency injection is used for mocking DOM/browser specific symbols. More context in this issue: angular#30586. The TL;DR here is that the Angular compiler does not care about types for these class members, so it won't ever reference `HTMLElement` at runtime. Fixes angular#30106. Fixes angular#30586. Fixes angular#30141. Resolves FW-2196. Resolves FW-2199. PR Close angular#37382
|
This issue has been automatically locked due to inactivity. Read more about our automatic conversation locking policy. This action has been performed automatically by a bot. |
…ngular#37382) In v7 of Angular we removed `tsickle` from the default `ngc` pipeline. This had the negative potential of breaking ES2015 output and SSR due to a limitation in TypeScript. TypeScript by default preserves type information for decorated constructor parameters when `emitDecoratorMetadata` is enabled. For example, consider this snippet below: ``` @directive() export class MyDirective { constructor(button: MyButton) {} } export class MyButton {} ``` TypeScript would generate metadata for the `MyDirective` class it has a decorator applied. This metadata would be needed in JIT mode, or for libraries that provide `MyDirective` through NPM. The metadata would look as followed: ``` let MyDirective = class MyDir {} MyDirective = __decorate([ Directive(), __metadata("design:paramtypes", [MyButton]), ], MyDirective); let MyButton = class MyButton {} ``` Notice that TypeScript generated calls to `__decorate` and `__metadata`. These calls are needed so that the Angular compiler is able to determine whether `MyDirective` is actually an directive, and what types are needed for dependency injection. The limitation surfaces in this concrete example because `MyButton` is declared after the `__metadata(..)` call, while `__metadata` actually directly references `MyButton`. This is illegal though because `MyButton` has not been declared at this point. This is due to the so-called temporal dead zone in JavaScript. Errors like followed will be reported at runtime when such file/code evaluates: ``` Uncaught ReferenceError: Cannot access 'MyButton' before initialization ``` As noted, this is a TypeScript limitation because ideally TypeScript shouldn't evaluate `__metadata`/reference `MyButton` immediately. Instead, it should defer the reference until `MyButton` is actually declared. This limitation will not be fixed by the TypeScript team though because it's a limitation as per current design and they will only revisit this once the tc39 decorator proposal is finalized (currently stage-2 at time of writing). Given this wontfix on the TypeScript side, and our heavy reliance on this metadata in libraries (and for JIT mode), we intend to fix this from within the Angular compiler by downleveling decorators to static properties that don't need to evaluate directly. For example: ``` MyDirective.ctorParameters = () => [MyButton]; ``` With this snippet above, `MyButton` is not referenced directly. Only lazily when the Angular runtime needs it. This mitigates the temporal dead zone issue caused by a limitation in TypeScript's decorator metadata output. See: microsoft/TypeScript#27519. In the past (as noted; before version 7), the Angular compiler by default used tsickle that already performed this transformation. We moved the transformation to the CLI for JIT and `ng-packager`, but now we realize that we can move this all to a single place in the compiler so that standalone ngc consumers can benefit too, and that we can disable tsickle in our Bazel `ngc-wrapped` pipeline (that currently still relies on tsickle to perform this decorator processing). This transformation also has another positive side-effect of making Angular application/library code more compatible with server-side rendering. In principle, TypeScript would also preserve type information for decorated class members (similar to how it did that for constructor parameters) at runtime. This becomes an issue when your application relies on native DOM globals for decorated class member types. e.g. ``` @input() panelElement: HTMLElement; ``` Your application code would then reference `HTMLElement` directly whenever the source file is loaded in NodeJS for SSR. `HTMLElement` does not exist on the server though, so that will become an invalid reference. One could work around this by providing global mocks for these DOM symbols, but that doesn't match up with other places where dependency injection is used for mocking DOM/browser specific symbols. More context in this issue: angular#30586. The TL;DR here is that the Angular compiler does not care about types for these class members, so it won't ever reference `HTMLElement` at runtime. Fixes angular#30106. Fixes angular#30586. Fixes angular#30141. Resolves FW-2196. Resolves FW-2199. PR Close angular#37382

Formed in 2009, the Archive Team (not to be confused with the archive.org Archive-It Team) is a rogue archivist collective dedicated to saving copies of rapidly dying or deleted websites for the sake of history and digital heritage. The group is 100% composed of volunteers and interested parties, and has expanded into a large amount of related projects for saving online and digital history.

fix(compiler-cli): downlevel angular decorators to static properties
In v7 of Angular we removed
tsicklefrom the defaultngcpipeline.This had the negative potential of breaking ES2015 output and SSR due
to a limitation in TypeScript.
TypeScript by default preserves type information for decorated constructor
parameters when
emitDecoratorMetadatais enabled. For example,consider this snippet below:
TypeScript would generate metadata for the
MyDirectiveclass it hasa decorator applied. This metadata would be needed in JIT mode, or
for libraries that provide
MyDirectivethrough NPM. The metadata wouldlook as followed:
Notice that TypeScript generated calls to
__decorateand__metadata. These calls are needed so that the Angular compileris able to determine whether
MyDirectiveis actually an directive,and what types are needed for dependency injection.
The limitation surfaces in this concrete example because
MyButtonis declared after the
__metadata(..)call, while__metadataactually directly references
MyButton. This is illegal though becauseMyButtonhas not been declared at this point. This is due to theso-called temporal dead zone in JavaScript. Errors like followed will
be reported at runtime when such file/code evaluates:
As noted, this is a TypeScript limitation because ideally TypeScript
shouldn't evaluate
__metadata/referenceMyButtonimmediately.Instead, it should defer the reference until
MyButtonis actuallydeclared. This limitation will not be fixed by the TypeScript team
though because it's a limitation as per current design and they will
only revisit this once the tc39 decorator proposal is finalized
(currently stage-2 at time of writing).
Given this wontfix on the TypeScript side, and our heavy reliance on
this metadata in libraries (and for JIT mode), we intend to fix this
from within the Angular compiler by downleveling decorators to static
properties that don't need to evaluate directly. For example:
With this snippet above,
MyButtonis not referenced directly. Onlylazily when the Angular runtime needs it. This mitigates the temporal
dead zone issue caused by a limitation in TypeScript's decorator
metadata output. See: microsoft/TypeScript#27519.
In the past (as noted; before version 7), the Angular compiler by
default used tsickle that already performed this transformation. We
moved the transformation to the CLI for JIT and
ng-packager, but nowwe realize that we can move this all to a single place in the compiler
so that standalone ngc consumers can benefit too, and that we can
disable tsickle in our Bazel
ngc-wrappedpipeline (that currentlystill relies on tsickle to perform this decorator processing).
This transformation also has another positive side-effect of making
Angular application/library code more compatible with server-side
rendering. In principle, TypeScript would also preserve type information
for decorated class members (similar to how it did that for constructor
parameters) at runtime. This becomes an issue when your application
relies on native DOM globals for decorated class member types. e.g.
Your application code would then reference
HTMLElementdirectlywhenever the source file is loaded in NodeJS for SSR.
HTMLElementdoes not exist on the server though, so that will become an invalid
reference. One could work around this by providing global mocks for
these DOM symbols, but that doesn't match up with other places where
dependency injection is used for mocking DOM/browser specific symbols.
More context in this issue: #30586. The TL;DR here is that the Angular
compiler does not care about types for these class members, so it won't
ever reference
HTMLElementat runtime.Fixes #30106. Fixes #30586. Fixes #30141.
Resolves FW-2196. Resolves FW-2199.