Effects of auditory training on adult cochlear implant patients: a preliminary report
- PMID: 18792249
- DOI: 10.1179/cim.2004.5.Supplement-1.84
Effects of auditory training on adult cochlear implant patients: a preliminary report
Abstract
The process of learning new electrically stimulated speech patterns can be difficult for many cochlear implant users, especially congenitally deafened patients. Some implant users receive little benefit from the device, even after long-term experience. While many factors may influence individual patient outcomes, the paucity of auditory rehabilitation resources, especially for adult users, may contribute to some implant patients' poorer performance. The present study examined whether moderate auditory training, using speech stimuli, can improve the speech-recognition performance of adult cochlear implant patients. Ten cochlear implant patients with limited speech-recognition capabilities used a recently developed computer-based auditory rehabilitation tool to train at home for a period of one month or longer. Before training began, baseline speech-recognition performance was measured for each patient; baseline performance was measured for at least two weeks, until performance asymptoted. After baseline measures were complete, subjects were instructed to train themselves at home using novel monosyllable words one hour per day, five days per week. Subjects then returned to the lab every two weeks for retesting with the baseline speech materials. Preliminary results showed that there was significant improvement in all patients' speech perception performance after moderate training. While most patients did improve, the amount and time course of improvement was highly variable. Moderate training using a computer-based auditory rehabilitation tool can be an effective approach to improve cochlear implant patients' speech recognition, especially for poorer-performing implant users.
Similar articles
-
Perceptual learning and auditory training in cochlear implant recipients.Trends Amplif. 2007 Sep;11(3):193-205. doi: 10.1177/1084713807301379. Trends Amplif. 2007. PMID: 17709574 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Melodic contour identification by cochlear implant listeners.Ear Hear. 2007 Jun;28(3):302-19. doi: 10.1097/01.aud.0000261689.35445.20. Ear Hear. 2007. PMID: 17485980 Free PMC article.
-
Computer-Assisted Speech Training for Cochlear Implant Patients: Feasibility, Outcomes, and Future Directions.Semin Hear. 2007 May 1;28(2):10.1055/s-2007-973440. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-973440. Semin Hear. 2007. PMID: 24273377 Free PMC article.
-
Computer-based auditory phoneme discrimination training improves speech recognition in noise in experienced adult cochlear implant listeners.Int J Audiol. 2015 Mar;54(3):190-8. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2014.969409. Epub 2014 Dec 31. Int J Audiol. 2015. PMID: 25549690 Clinical Trial.
-
Systematic Review of Auditory Training Outcomes in Adult Cochlear Implant Recipients and Meta-Analysis of Outcomes.J Clin Med. 2024 Jan 11;13(2):400. doi: 10.3390/jcm13020400. J Clin Med. 2024. PMID: 38256533 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Voice gender and the segregation of competing talkers: Perceptual learning in cochlear implant simulations.J Acoust Soc Am. 2017 Mar;141(3):1643. doi: 10.1121/1.4976002. J Acoust Soc Am. 2017. PMID: 28372046 Free PMC article.
-
Quality of cochlear implant rehabilitation under COVID-19 conditions.HNO. 2021 Jan;69(Suppl 1):1-6. doi: 10.1007/s00106-020-00923-z. HNO. 2021. PMID: 33034674 Free PMC article.
-
Auditory cortical plasticity in cochlear implant users.Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2020 Feb;60:108-114. doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2019.11.003. Epub 2019 Dec 18. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2020. PMID: 31864104 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Auditory Training for Adults Who Have Hearing Loss: A Comparison of Spaced Versus Massed Practice Schedules.J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2017 Aug 16;60(8):2337-2345. doi: 10.1044/2017_JSLHR-H-16-0154. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2017. PMID: 28787475 Free PMC article.
-
Efficacy of individual computer-based auditory training for people with hearing loss: a systematic review of the evidence.PLoS One. 2013 May 10;8(5):e62836. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0062836. Print 2013. PLoS One. 2013. PMID: 23675431 Free PMC article.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous