Placebo effects in hearing-aid trials are reliable
- PMID: 23594421
- DOI: 10.3109/14992027.2013.783718
Placebo effects in hearing-aid trials are reliable
Abstract
Objective: A recent study suggested that placebo effects are a source of bias in non-blinded hearing-aid trials. Given the potential impact of this finding on the interpretation of non-blinded trials and design of future research trials, the objective of the present study was to investigate the reliability of this effect.
Design: Using the same procedure as an earlier study, participants were told that they were taking part in a trial of new hearing-aid technology. Participants compared two devices that were acoustically identical, except one was described as "new" and the other as "conventional". Participants completed a speech-in-noise test, sound quality ratings, and rated overall personal preference for both hearing aids.
Study sample: Sixteen adult hearing-aid users.
Results: Participants had significantly better mean speech-in-noise performance (70.9% versus 66.8%, Z = 2.30, p = 0.02, effect size Pearson's r = 0.15) and sound quality ratings for the "new" hearing aid (8.1 versus 7.4, Z = - 2.99, p = 0.003, r = 0.28). A significant proportion of participants (75%) expressed an overall preference for the "new" hearing aid (p = 0.001, effect size φc = 0.66).
Conclusion: Placebo effects reliably impact on hearing-aid trials. In order to control for placebo effects, double-blind methodology is optimal. However, when double-blinding is not possible other strategies may be appropriate.
Similar articles
-
Effects of noise and working memory capacity on memory processing of speech for hearing-aid users.Int J Audiol. 2013 Jul;52(7):433-41. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2013.776181. Epub 2013 Apr 4. Int J Audiol. 2013. PMID: 23550584
-
The performance of an automatic acoustic-based program classifier compared to hearing aid users' manual selection of listening programs.Int J Audiol. 2018 Mar;57(3):201-212. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2017.1392048. Epub 2017 Oct 25. Int J Audiol. 2018. PMID: 29069954
-
The placebo effect and the influence of participant expectation on hearing aid trials.Ear Hear. 2011 Nov-Dec;32(6):767-74. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3182251a0e. Ear Hear. 2011. PMID: 21730857 Clinical Trial.
-
Does the acceptable noise level (ANL) predict hearing-aid use?Int J Audiol. 2014 Jan;53(1):2-20. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2013.839887. Epub 2013 Nov 13. Int J Audiol. 2014. PMID: 24219089 Review.
-
Functionality of hearing aids: state-of-the-art and future model-based solutions.Int J Audiol. 2018 Jun;57(sup3):S3-S28. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2016.1256504. Epub 2016 Dec 13. Int J Audiol. 2018. PMID: 27951738 Review.
Cited by
-
Clinical evaluation of an over-the-counter hearing aid (TEO First®) in elderly patients suffering of mild to moderate hearing loss.BMC Geriatr. 2016 Jul 9;16:136. doi: 10.1186/s12877-016-0304-4. BMC Geriatr. 2016. PMID: 27392722 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Evaluation of Auditory Functioning and Rehabilitation Using Patient-Reported Outcome Measures.Trends Hear. 2018 Jan-Dec;22:2331216518789022. doi: 10.1177/2331216518789022. Trends Hear. 2018. PMID: 30047308 Free PMC article.
-
Focusing on Positive Listening Experiences Improves Speech Intelligibility in Experienced Hearing Aid Users.Trends Hear. 2024 Jan-Dec;28:23312165241246616. doi: 10.1177/23312165241246616. Trends Hear. 2024. PMID: 38656770 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Is There Incremental Benefit with Incremental Hearing Device Technology for Adults with Hearing Loss?Audiol Res. 2025 May 6;15(3):52. doi: 10.3390/audiolres15030052. Audiol Res. 2025. PMID: 40407666 Free PMC article.
-
Clinical Trials and Outcome Measures in Adults With Hearing Loss.Front Psychol. 2021 Nov 5;12:733060. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.733060. eCollection 2021. Front Psychol. 2021. PMID: 34803809 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
