Skip to main content
American Journal of Physiology - Endocrinology and Metabolism logoLink to American Journal of Physiology - Endocrinology and Metabolism
. 2008 Jun 10;295(2):E262–E268. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.90208.2008

Transient prenatal androgen exposure produces metabolic syndrome in adult female rats

Marek Demissie 1,3,*, Milos Lazic 1,*, Eileen M Foecking 2, Fraser Aird 1, Andrea Dunaif 1,*, Jon E Levine 2,*
PMCID: PMC2519755  PMID: 18544644

Abstract

Androgen exposure during intrauterine life in nonhuman primates and in sheep results in a phenocopy of the reproductive and metabolic features of polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). Such exposure also results in reproductive features of PCOS in rodents. We investigated whether transient prenatal androgen treatment produced metabolic abnormalities in adult female rats and the mechanisms of these changes. Pregnant dams received free testosterone or vehicle injections during late gestation, and their female offspring were fed regular or high-fat diet (HFD). At 60 days of age, prenatally androgenized (PA) rats exhibited significantly increased body weight; parametrial and subcutaneous fat; serum insulin, cholesterol and triglyceride levels; and hepatic triglyceride content (all P < 0.0125). There were no significant differences in insulin sensitivity by intraperitoneal insulin tolerance test or insulin signaling in liver or skeletal muscle. HFD had similar effects to PA on body weight and composition as well as on circulating triglyceride levels. HFD further increased hepatic triglyceride content to a similar extent in both PA and control rats. In PA rats, HFD did not further increase circulating insulin, triglyceride, or cholesterol levels. In control rats, HFD increased insulin levels, but to a lesser extent than PA alone (∼2.5- vs. ∼12-fold, respectively). We conclude that transient prenatal androgen exposure produces features of the metabolic syndrome in adult female rats. Dyslipidemia and hepatic steatosis appear to be mediated by PA-induced increases in adiposity, whereas hyperinsulinemia appears to be a direct result of PA.

Keywords: prenatal androgen exposure, metabolic syndrome, polycystic ovary syndrome, hepatic steatosis


polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is among the most common disorders of premenopausal women, affecting ∼7% of this population (35). Hyperandrogenemia is the cardinal reproductive feature of the syndrome (11, 28), whereas insulin resistance is the central metabolic phenotype (12). Abnormalities associated with insulin resistance are common in PCOS, such as obesity, dyslipidemia, and an increased risk for Type 2 diabetes mellitus and, possibly, cardiovascular disease (38). Hepatic steatosis, another finding associated with insulin resistance (22), is also increased in frequency in PCOS (20).

The mechanism for the association between these reproductive and metabolic abnormalities has been the subject of intense investigation since this phenomenon was first recognized in 1980 (8). There is extensive evidence that insulin functions as a cogonadotropin to stimulate ovarian androgen production (6). Furthermore, because lowering androgen levels results in, at best, modest improvements in insulin sensitivity (33), it has been widely accepted that insulin resistance causes hyperandrogenemia rather than vice versa (12). However, recent studies have challenged this view. First, androgen exposure during intrauterine life in nonhuman primates and in sheep produces many features of not only the reproductive but also of the metabolic phenotype of PCOS (1, 18). Human studies suggest that androgens play an important role in the abnormalities of feedback regulation of gonadotropin secretion (13) and that they contribute to certain metabolic defects characteristic of the syndrome (21). Consistent with an essential role of androgens in the development of PCOS, girls at high risk for the disorder may have early androgen excess (23, 31). Thus the developmental role of androgen excess in the etiology of PCOS has received renewed attention (1).

It is clear that androgens can act on the brain to induce major sex differences in neural structure and function (9). We have reported defeminization of the gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) neurosecretory system with accelerated basal GnRH pulse generator activity, similar to women with PCOS, in prenatally androgenized female rats (17). There has also been growing interest in their role in metabolic programming (43). Both transient neonatal and continuous pre- to postpubertal exposure resulted in insulin resistance and alterations in body composition in adult female rats (3, 29, 34). Accordingly, we sought to determine whether fetal exposure to androgen excess in female rats would also program a PCOS-like metabolic phenotype and to examine the mechanisms of such changes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Animal treatments and diet.

All animal procedures were approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee at Northwestern University (Evanston, IL). Rats were housed at 23–24°C on a 10:14-h light-dark cycle.

Time-pregnant female Sprague-Dawley rats were obtained from Charles River (Portage, WI) at day 14 of gestation and treated from embryonic day (E) 16 to E19 with daily subcutaneous (sc) injections of 5 mg of free testosterone (T-1500; Sigma, St. Louis, MO) dissolved in 500 μl sesame oil (S3547; Sigma)/benzyl benzoate (B6630; Sigma) (prenatally androgenized: PA n = 8) or of 500 μl sesame oil vehicle as a control (C, n = 12). This hormonal paradigm mimics the fetal testosterone surge that is observed in male rats (17). In preliminary experiments, we found no significant difference in either the female-to-male offspring ratio, number of pups per litter, or birth weights between PA and C animals (unpublished observations). Pups were culled from control litters to equalize group sizes. All litters were weaned, and females were separated from males at 21 days of age and fed regular chow diet (RD) (3.30 kcal/g: kcal from fat 15%, carbohydrate 62%, and protein 23%; 7912 Harlan-Teklad, Madison, WI) and water ad libitum. Body weights were monitored weekly from the day of weaning to tissue harvest at age 60 days.

Study protocols.

At 35 days of age, female rats were either kept on RD (n = 37) or switched to the high-fat diet (HFD; n = 19) (5.24 kcal/g: kcal from fat 60%, carbohydrate 20%, and protein 20%, D12492 Test Diet; Purina Mills, Richmond, IN). There were 20 C RD, 17 PA RD, 11 C HFD, and 8 PA HFD female rats. Adult female rats (aged 60–63 days) on their respective diets were fasted overnight, anesthetized with CO2, weighed, and decapitated. To examine insulin signaling, one-half of the animals in all experimental groups were injected intraperitoneally with 5 U of regular human insulin (Novo Nordisk, Princeton, NJ) in 100 μl 0.9% sodium chloride (Abraxis, Schaumburg, IL), and half with 100 μl 0.9% sodium chloride 10 min before death. Trunk blood was collected and centrifuged, and serum was stored at −80°C. Glucose, insulin, cholesterol, and triglyceride (TG) levels were determined in samples from saline-treated animals only (10 C RD, 8 PA RD, 6 C HFD, 4 PA HFD). Liver, adipose tissue depots (parametrial and sc), and soleus muscles were excised, weighed, frozen, and stored at −80°C for further analyses. Tissues from both saline- and insulin-treated rats were used for analyses of body composition and hepatic TG content (15 C RD, 13 PA RD, 11 C HFD, 8 PA HFD), since administration of insulin would not acutely alter these end points (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Study schema with the number of animals used in each experiment.

Dynamic studies.

Dynamic studies of glucose homeostasis were performed in separate groups of animals at age 60 days after a 6-h fast with jugular catheters implanted 1 day before testing. Intraperitoneal (ip) glucose tolerance test (IPGTT) was performed in 5 C RD and 6 PA RD rats. A baseline blood sample was followed by intraperitoneal injection of 2 g/kg body wt dextrose and blood sampling at 2, 5, 10, 15, 30, 60, 90, and 120 min. Intraperitoneal insulin tolerance test (IPITT) was performed in a separate group of 4 C RD and 6 PA RD rats. A baseline blood sample was obtained followed by ip injection of insulin (5 U/rat) with blood sampling at 15, 30, 60, 90 and 120 min.

Hormone assays and hepatic TG content.

Whole blood glucose levels were measured using a Prestige Smart System Glucose Monitor (Home Diagnostics, Ft. Lauderdale, FL). Insulin levels were measured by a rat insulin ELISA kit (Crystal Chem, Downers Grove, IL). Circulating TG and cholesterol levels and hepatic TG content were assessed by spectrophotometric assay (Infinity Triglyceride Reagent Kit; Thermo Electron, Pittsburgh, PA). Hepatic TG content was expressed as percent of protein content as described previously (41). Frozen livers were stained with Oil red-O for lipids (19).

Western blotting.

Liver and soleus muscle lysates (100 μg protein) were resolved using SDS-PAGE on 7.5% gels and incubated with specific antibodies to insulin receptor substrate (IRS)-1 (Upstate Biotechnology, Lake Placid, NY), IRS-2 (gift of Dr. M. White; Joslin Diabetes Center, Boston, MA), protein kinase B (Akt), phospho-Akt (Ser473), extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK)1/2, phospho-ERK1/2 (Thr202/Tyr204) (Cell Signaling, Beverly, MA), insulin receptor β-subunit (IR-β; BD Transduction Laboratories, San Jose, CA), and appropriate secondary antibodies (goat anti-rabbit and -mouse horseradish peroxidase conjugates; Cell Signaling), with PA and C samples run together on the same gels. Bands were visualized and analyzed as described previously (10). Phosphorylation was expressed as the ratio of phosphorylated to total protein.

Statistical analysis.

Repeated-measures two-way ANOVA with time and treatment as factors was applied to body weight, IPITT, and IPGTT with a Bonferroni's post hoc test to determine which groups differed significantly. For all other analyses, comparisons of interest, 1) C RD vs PA RD, 2) C RD vs C HFD, 3) C HFD vs PA HFD, and 4) PA RD vs PA HFD, were made separately using the appropriate parametric (Student's t-test) or nonparametric (Mann-Whitney) tests according to the sample size (n ≤ 6, nonparametric test used) and/or the normality of the data. A Bonferroni correction for multiple testing was used to adjust the threshold for statistical significance to P < 0.0125 for these four comparisons. The data were transformed when necessary to achieve homogeneity of variance. Data are reported as means ± SE. All analyses were performed using GraphPad Software (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA).

RESULTS

Baseline features.

PA treatment did not result in changes in body weight at weaning (Fig. 2). Beginning at 42 days, body weight began to increase in PA compared with C rats (Fig. 2). PA rats had significantly increased body weight compared with C rats at 60 days (P < 0.01, Fig. 2). The parametrial and subcutaneous fat depots were increased by 30% at 60 days in PA compared with C rats (P < 0.0125, Fig. 2). HFD produced similar changes in C rats in body and fat pad weights to those observed in PA rats with RD and did not further change these parameters in PA rats (Fig. 2). PA rats exhibited ∼12-fold higher fasting insulin levels compared with C rats at 60 days (P < 0.005, Fig. 3). However, fasting glucose levels at 60 days did not differ in PA compared with C rats (Fig. 3). HFD produced a significant ∼2.5-fold increase in fasting insulin levels in C rats (C RD vs C HFD, P < 0.0125). In PA rats, HFD did not further increase circulating insulin levels (Fig. 3).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

A: body weight change with age in control (C; ▵) and prenatally androgenized (PA; ▴) rats on regular chow diet (RD). B: body weight change with age in C (□) and PA (▪) rats on a high-fat diet (HFD). Parametrial (C) and sc (D) fat pad weights in C (open bars) and PA (filled bars) rats on RD and HFD. Values are means ± SE; C RD n = 20, PA RD n = 17, C HFD n = 11, and PA HFD n = 8. **P < 0.01 vs C RD (A). *P < 0.0125 and **P < 0.005 vs C RD (C and D).

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

Serum insulin (A) and glucose (B) levels in C (open bars) and PA (filled bars) rats on RD and HFD. Values are means ± SE; C RD n = 9, PA RD n = 8, C HFD n = 6, and PA HFD n = 4 (samples from saline-treated rats only). *P < 0.0125 and **P < 0.005 vs C RD. †P < 0.0125 vs C HFD.

There was an increase in both fasting TG and cholesterol levels in PA compared with C rats (P < 0.0125, Fig. 4). HFD increased TG levels in C rats and did not further influence them in PA rats (Fig. 4). Cholesterol levels in C and PA rats on HFD did not differ from those in C RD rats. Hepatic TG content was increased in PA compared with C rats (P < 0.0125), and the increased lipid content was also visualized with oil red-O stain (Fig. 4). HFD produced greater increases in hepatic TG content in both PA and C rats than those seen with PA alone (Fig. 4).

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4.

Serum triglyceride (TG; A) and total cholesterol (B) levels in C (open bars) and PA (filled bars) rats on RD and HFD. C: hepatic TG content/μg liver protein in C (open bars) and PA (filled bars) rats. D: oil red-O stain for lipids in the liver (top: C RD, PA RD; bottom: C HFD, PA HFD). Values are means ± SE; C RD n = 10, PA RD n = 8, C HFD n = 6, PA and HFD n = 4 for serum TG and cholesterol (samples from saline-treated rats only); C RD n = 15, PA RD n = 13, C HFD n = 11, and PA HFD n = 8 for hepatic TG content (samples from saline and insulin-treated rats). *P < 0.0125, **P < 0.005, and ***P < 0.001 vs C RD. ‡‡‡P < 0.001 vs PA RD.

Dynamic testing.

Following IPGTT, there were no differences in glucose or insulin responses between PA and C groups (Fig. 5). There were no differences in insulin sensitivity assessed by IPITT in PA and C rats (Fig. 5).

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5.

Glucose (A) and insulin (B) levels during intraperitoneal glucose tolerance test (IPGTT); %basal glucose during intraperitoneal insulin tolerance test (IPITT; C) in C (▵) and PA (▴) rats on RD . Values are means ± SE. For IPITT, C RD n = 5 and PA RD n = 6. For IPGTT, C RD n = 4 and PA RD n = 6.

Insulin signaling.

There were no significant changes in IRS-1 or IRS-2 protein abundance in PA compared with C rats in liver or skeletal muscle with either diet (Fig. 6). There were no differences in the abundance of IR-β in the livers of PA compared with C rats on either diet (data not shown). There were also no differences in insulin-stimulated activation of Akt (Fig. 7) or of ERK1/2 (not shown) in PA compared with C rat skeletal muscle or liver with either diet.

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6.

Insulin receptor substrate (IRS)-1 and IRS-2 in the liver (A and C) and the skeletal muscle (B and D) from C (open bars) and PA (black bars) rats on RD and HFD. Representative gel images are shown above each graph. Values are means ± SE; C RD n = 10, PA RD n = 8, C HFD n = 6, and PA HFD n = 4 (samples from saline-treated rats only).

Fig. 7.

Fig. 7.

Insulin signaling [represented as a phospho-protein kinase B (Akt)-to-Akt ratio] in RD and HFD rats after 10 min ± insulin (5 U) in liver (A and C, respectively) and skeletal muscle (B and D, respectively) from C (open bars) and PA (black bars) rats. Representative gel images for phospho-proteins are shown above each graph. Values are means ± SE; C RD n = 10 saline, n = 10 insulin; PA RD n = 8 saline, n = 9 insulin; C HFD n = 6 saline, n = 5 insulin; and PA HFD n = 4 saline, n = 4 insulin.

DISCUSSION

These studies reveal that transient prenatal exposure to androgens during late gestation programs adult female rat offspring for increased: 1) body weight and visceral adiposity, 2) serum insulin, TG, and cholesterol levels and 3) hepatic TG content, all features of the metabolic syndrome in humans (30). However, there was no evidence for defects in insulin action in PA compared with control rats. High-fat feeding in control rats had similar effects to those of PA on body weight and composition, and circulating TG levels. High-fat feeding did not exacerbate these changes in PA rats, whereas it substantially increased hepatic TG content in both PA and control rats. In contrast, HFD produced smaller but significant increases in insulin levels in C rats than PA alone, despite similar body weights, but did not further exacerbate this change in PA rats.

It is known that transient prenatal androgen exposure can produce metabolic abnormalities in the adult sheep and rhesus monkeys (1, 18). In sheep, PA treatment results in offspring with reduced birth weight, insulin resistance (37), and higher blood pressure (25). In both male and female rhesus monkeys, such treatment results in impaired insulin secretion and reduced insulin sensitivity (2, 7), whereas it increases visceral obesity only in females (14). The metabolic effects of prenatal androgen exposure have not been investigated in rodents. However, both transient neonatal and continuous pre- to postpubertal androgen treatment results in increased visceral fat depots and insulin resistance in adult female rats (3, 29, 34). Neonatal testosterone treatment also produces increased serum cholesterol and TG levels (3). Our study demonstrates that prenatal testosterone treatment can produce similar metabolic changes in adult female offspring. Furthermore, PA also resulted in hepatic steatosis, a novel finding that has not been reported previously with either pre- or postnatal androgen treatment in any species (1, 18, 43).

The contribution of body weight and composition to the metabolic phenotype resulting from exposure to testosterone at critical developmental periods has not been investigated in prior studies (1, 3, 18, 29). Our findings suggest that increased adiposity mediates most of the observed metabolic changes since they were reproduced in control animals by HFD, which resulted in similar increases in weight and visceral adiposity. Thus one of the major mechanisms for PA-mediated metabolic changes may be through increased food intake and/or decreased energy expenditure, resulting in greater adiposity (32, 40).

The only prominent metabolic change specific to PA was the increase in circulating insulin levels, despite similar increases in body weight in control rats during HFD. These findings suggest that prenatal testosterone has an impact on glucose homeostasis that is independent of increased adiposity. Because glucose levels did not fall despite increased circulating insulin levels, these findings suggest the presence of insulin resistance (4), despite our failure to detect significant decreases in insulin sensitivity or signaling. Indeed, it is quite plausible that modest decreases in insulin action escaped detection because the IPITT is less sensitive than the glucose clamp technique for assessing this parameter (5). The observation that PA had a more substantial effect on circulating insulin levels than HFD may be due to androgen-mediated decreases in insulin clearance, such as those that have been reported with postnatal testosterone treatment (27). However, we detected no decreases in IR-β abundance in livers of PA females, regardless of the diet, suggesting that there were no alterations in receptor-mediated insulin clearance due to PA treatment. It is also possible that PA caused increases in pancreatic β-cell mass similar to those observed in other models for metabolic programming (36). These possibilities will be directly assessed in future studies.

Studies of postnatal androgen exposure suggest that androgen acting directly through activation of the androgen receptor (3, 29) or by aromatization to estrogen (3) can result in metabolic abnormalities in rodents. The timing of androgen exposure may also be critical. Testosterone treatment earlier during gestation results in defects in insulin secretion, whereas treatment later in gestation results in decreased insulin sensitivity in adult female rhesus monkeys (2). In female rats, both transient neonatal (3) and continuous pre- to postpubertal (29) dihydrotestosterone treatments result in insulin resistance, whereas only the pre- to postpubertal treatment results in increased total body and fat weight. Moreover, other prenatal insults, such as maternal caloric restriction, nutrient excess, or stress, result in metabolic abnormalities in adult offspring, such as increased circulating lipid levels, hepatic steatosis, and insulin resistance (15, 16). These observations suggest that prenatal androgen treatment could cause other changes in the maternal-fetal environment that contribute to the phenotype.

In conclusion, hyperandrogenemia is the cardinal reproductive feature of PCOS (11, 28), and its development may be one of the earliest harbingers of the disorder (24). We have recently mapped a susceptibility variant for hyperandrogenemia in PCOS to an intron of the fibrillin-3 gene (42), consistent with the hypothesis that hyperandrogenemia is a fundamental defect in this disorder. Increased endogenous androgen levels are also associated with metabolic syndrome in epidemiological studies in both pre- and postmenopausal women (26, 39). Our study suggests that androgen excess at critical prenatal developmental periods could play a role in the pathogenesis of PCOS, obesity, and metabolic syndrome.

GRANTS

This work was supported by National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Grants P50 HD-044405, U54 HD-041859, and R01 HD-020677.

Acknowledgments

We thank Jorie Aardema for performing certain hormone assays.

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked “advertisement” in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Abbott DH, Barnett DK, Bruns CM, Dumesic DA. Androgen excess fetal programming of female reproduction: a developmental aetiology for polycystic ovary syndrome? Hum Reprod Update 11: 357–374, 2005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Abbott DH, Dumesic DA, Eisner JR, Colman RJ, Kemnitz JW. Insights into the development of polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) from studies of prenatally androgenized female rhesus monkeys. Trends Endocrinol Metab 9: 62–67, 1998. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Alexanderson C, Eriksson E, Stener-Victorin E, Lystig T, Gabrielsson B, Lonn M, Holmang A. Postnatal testosterone exposure results in insulin resistance, enlarged mesenteric adipocytes, and an atherogenic lipid profile in adult female rats: comparisons with estradiol and dihydrotestosterone. Endocrinology 148: 5369–5376, 2007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Bergman RN Orchestration of glucose homeostasis: from a small acorn to the California oak. Diabetes 56: 1489–1501, 2007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Bergman RN, Finegood DT, Ader M. Assessment of insulin sensitivity in vivo. Endocr Rev 6: 45–86, 1985. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Blank SK, McCartney CR, Marshall JC. The origins and sequelae of abnormal neuroendocrine function in polycystic ovary syndrome. Hum Reprod Update 12: 351–361, 2006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Bruns CM, Baum ST, Colman RJ, Eisner JR, Kemnitz JW, Weindruch R, Abbott DH. Insulin resistance and impaired insulin secretion in prenatally androgenized male rhesus monkeys. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 89: 6218–6223, 2004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Burghen GA, Givens JR, Kitabchi AE. Correlation of hyperandrogenism with hyperinsulinism in polycystic ovarian disease. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 50: 113–116, 1980. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Christine Knickmeyer R, Baron-Cohen S. Fetal testosterone and sex differences. Early Hum Dev 82: 755–760, 2006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Corbould A, Zhao H, Mirzoeva S, Aird F, Dunaif A. Enhanced mitogenic signaling in skeletal muscle of women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Diabetes 55: 751–759, 2006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Dunaif A Hyperandrogenemia is necessary but not sufficient for polycystic ovary syndrome. Fertil Steril 80: 262–263, 2003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Dunaif A Insulin resistance and the polycystic ovary syndrome: mechanism and implications for pathogenesis. Endocr Rev 18: 774–800, 1997. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Eagleson CA, Gingrich MB, Pastor CL, Arora TK, Burt CM, Evans WS, Marshall JC. Polycystic ovarian syndrome: evidence that flutamide restores sensitivity of the gonadotropin-releasing hormone pulse generator to inhibition by estradiol and progesterone. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 85: 4047–4052, 2000. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Eisner JR, Dumesic DA, Kemnitz JW, Colman RJ, Abbott DH. Increased adiposity in female rhesus monkeys exposed to androgen excess during early gestation. Obes Res 11: 279–286, 2003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Erhuma A, Salter AM, Sculley DV, Langley-Evans SC, Bennett AJ. Prenatal exposure to a low-protein diet programs disordered regulation of lipid metabolism in the aging rat. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 292: E1702–E1714, 2007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Fernandez-Twinn DS, Ozanne SE. Mechanisms by which poor early growth programs type-2 diabetes, obesity and the metabolic syndrome. Physiol Behav 88: 234–243, 2006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Foecking EM, Szabo M, Schwartz NB, Levine JE. Neuroendocrine consequences of prenatal androgen exposure in the female rat: absence of luteinizing hormone surges, suppression of progesterone receptor gene expression, and acceleration of the gonadotropin-releasing hormone pulse generator. Biol Reprod 72: 1475–1483, 2005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Franks S, McCarthy MI, Hardy K. Development of polycystic ovary syndrome: involvement of genetic and environmental factors. Int J Androl 29: 278–290, 2006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Gahan PBBJ, Chayen GJ, Cunnigham GJ, Maggi V. The unmasking of cytoplasmic lipids in rat livers as a consequence of dietary changes. Quart Micr Sci 1–43, 1963.
  • 20.Gambarin-Gelwan M, Kinkhabwala SV, Schiano TD, Bodian C, Yeh HC, Futterweit W. Prevalence of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 5: 496–501, 2007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Gambineri A, Patton L, Vaccina A, Cacciari M, Morselli-Labate AM, Cavazza C, Pagotto U, Pasquali R. Treatment with flutamide, metformin, and their combination added to a hypocaloric diet in overweight-obese women with polycystic ovary syndrome: a randomized, 12-month, placebo-controlled study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 91: 3970–3980, 2006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Hui JM, Hodge A, Farrell GC, Kench JG, Kriketos A, George J. Beyond insulin resistance in NASH: TNF-alpha or adiponectin? Hepatology 40: 46–54, 2004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Ibanez L, Dimartino-Nardi J, Potau N, Saenger P. Premature adrenarche–normal variant or forerunner of adult disease? Endocr Rev 21: 671–696, 2000. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Ibanez L, Valls C, Potau N, Marcos MV, de Zegher F. Polycystic ovary syndrome after precocious pubarche: ontogeny of the low-birthweight effect. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 55: 667–672, 2001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.King AJ, Bari Olivier N, Mohankumar PS, Lee JS, Padmanabhan V, Fink GD. Hypertension caused by prenatal testosterone excess in female sheep. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 292: E1837–E1841, 2007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Korhonen S, Hippelainen M, Vanhala M, Heinonen S, Niskanen L. The androgenic sex hormone profile is an essential feature of metabolic syndrome in premenopausal women: a controlled community-based study. Fertil Steril 79: 1327–1334, 2003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Krakower GR, Meier DA, Kissebah AH. Female sex hormones, perinatal, and peripubertal androgenization on hepatocyte insulin dynamics in rats. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 264: E342–E347, 1993. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Legro RS, Driscoll D, Strauss JF 3rd, Fox J, Dunaif A. Evidence for a genetic basis for hyperandrogenemia in polycystic ovary syndrome. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95: 14956–14960, 1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Manneras LCS, Holmang A, Seleskovic Z, Lystig T, Lonn M, Stener-Victorin E. A new rat model exhibiting both ovarian and metabolic characteristics of polycystic ovary syndrome. Endocrinology 148: 3781–3791, 2007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Marchesini G, Marzocchi R, Agostini F, Bugianesi E. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and the metabolic syndrome. Curr Opin Lipidol 16: 421–427, 2005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.McCartney CR, Blank SK, Prendergast KA, Chhabra S, Eagleson CA, Helm KD, Yoo R, Chang RJ, Foster CM, Caprio S, Marshall JC. Obesity and sex steroid changes across puberty: evidence for marked hyperandrogenemia in pre- and early pubertal obese girls. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 92: 430–436, 2007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.McMillen IC, Adam CL, Muhlhausler BS. Early origins of obesity: programming the appetite regulatory system. J Physiol 565: 9–17, 2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Moghetti P, Tosi F, Castello R, Magnani CM, Negri C, Brun E, Furlani L, Caputo M, Muggeo M. The insulin resistance in women with hyperandrogenism is partially reversed by antiandrogen treatment: evidence that androgens impair insulin action in women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 81: 952–960, 1996. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Nilsson C, Niklasson M, Eriksson E, Bjorntorp P, Holmang A. Imprinting of female offspring with testosterone results in insulin resistance and changes in body fat distribution at adult age in rats. J Clin Invest 101: 74–78, 1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Norman RJ, Dewailly D, Legro RS, Hickey TE. Polycystic ovary syndrome. Lancet 370: 685–697, 2007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Patel MS, Srinivasan M. Metabolic programming: causes and consequences. J Biol Chem 277: 1629–1632, 2002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Recabarren SE, Padmanabhan V, Codner E, Lobos A, Duran C, Vidal M, Foster DL, Sir-Petermann T. Postnatal developmental consequences of altered insulin sensitivity in female sheep treated prenatally with testosterone. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 289: E801–E806, 2005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Sam S, Dunaif A. Polycystic ovary syndrome: syndrome XX? Trends Endocrinol Metab 14: 365–370, 2003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Santoro N, Torrens J, Crawford S, Allsworth JE, Finkelstein JS, Gold EB, Korenman S, Lasley WL, Luborsky JL, McConnell D, Sowers MF, Weiss G. Correlates of circulating androgens in mid-life women: the study of women's health across the nation. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 90: 4836–4845, 2005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Schwartz MW, Porte D Jr. Diabetes, obesity, and the brain. Science 307: 375–379, 2005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Sundaram SS, Whitington PF, Green RM. Steatohepatitis develops rapidly in transgenic mice overexpressing Abcb11 and fed a methionine-choline-deficient diet. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 288: G1321–G1327, 2005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Urbanek M, Sam S, Legro RS, Dunaif A. Identification of a polycystic ovary syndrome susceptibility variant in fibrillin-3 and association with a metabolic phenotype. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 92: 4191–4198, 2007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Xita N, Tsatsoulis A. Review: fetal programming of polycystic ovary syndrome by androgen excess: evidence from experimental, clinical, and genetic association studies. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 91: 1660–1666, 2006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from American Journal of Physiology - Endocrinology and Metabolism are provided here courtesy of American Physiological Society

RESOURCES