Skip to main content
Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease logoLink to Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease
. 2014 Jun 27;3(4):e000965. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.114.000965

Reducing Endoglin Activity Limits Calcineurin and TRPC‐6 Expression and Improves Survival in a Mouse Model of Right Ventricular Pressure Overload

Navin K Kapur 1, Xiaoying Qiao 1, Vikram Paruchuri 1, Emily E Mackey 1, Gerard H Daly 1, Keshan Ughreja 1, Kevin J Morine 1, Jonathan Levine 1, Mark J Aronovitz 1, Nicholas S Hill 1, Iris Z Jaffe 1, Michelle Letarte 2, Richard H Karas 1
PMCID: PMC4310384  PMID: 25015075

Abstract

Background

Right ventricular (RV) failure is a major cause of mortality worldwide and is often a consequence of RV pressure overload (RVPO). Endoglin is a coreceptor for the profibrogenic cytokine, transforming growth factor beta 1 (TGF‐β1). TGF‐β1 signaling by the canonical transient receptor protein channel 6 (TRPC‐6) was recently reported to stimulate calcineurin‐mediated myofibroblast transformation, a critical component of cardiac fibrosis. We hypothesized that reduced activity of the TGF‐β1 coreceptor, endoglin, limits RV calcineurin expression and improves survival in RVPO.

Methods and Results

We first demonstrate that endoglin is required for TGF‐β1‐mediated calcineurin/TRPC‐6 expression and up‐regulation of alpha‐smooth muscle antigen (α‐SMA), a marker of myofibroblast transformation, in human RV fibroblasts. Using endoglin haploinsufficient mice (Eng+/−) we show that reduced endoglin activity preserves RV function, limits RV fibrosis, and attenuates activation of the calcineurin/TRPC‐6/α‐SMA pathway in a model of angio‐obliterative pulmonary hypertension. Next, using Eng+/− mice or a neutralizing antibody (Ab) against endoglin (N‐Eng) in wild‐type mice, we show that reduced endoglin activity improves survival and attenuates RV fibrosis in models of RVPO induced by pulmonary artery constriction. To explore the utility of targeting endoglin, we observed a reversal of RV fibrosis and calcineurin levels in wild‐type mice treated with a N‐Eng Ab, compared to an immunoglobulin G control.

Conclusion

These data establish endoglin as a regulator of TGF‐β1 signaling by calcineurin and TRPC‐6 in the RV and identify it as a potential therapeutic target to limit RV fibrosis and improve survival in RVPO, a common cause of death in cardiac and pulmonary disease.

Keywords: heart failure, pulmonary hypertension, fibrosis, right ventricle, cardiac remodeling

Introduction

Right ventricular (RV) failure (RVF) is a major determinant of morbidity and mortality for millions of individuals worldwide who suffer from lung disease or a variety of cardiac diseases, including left heart failure (LHF).12 RVF is commonly a direct consequence of RV pressure overload (RVPO). Recent data confirm that elevated pulmonary artery systolic pressures are associated with impaired RV diastolic function as a consequence of RV hypertrophy and fibrosis.3 RVPO has also been directly related to increased mortality in both lung disease and LHF.45 Despite the clinical significance of impaired RV function, our understanding of changes in RV structure and function remains quite limited and stems primarily from data generated in models of left ventricular (LV) failure (LVF). In addition, the molecular mechanisms that mediate these effects remain poorly understood.

Endoglin is a 180‐kDA transmembrane glycoprotein that promotes canonical and noncanonical signaling through transforming growth factor beta 1 (TGF‐β1), one of the most potent cytokines involved in cardiac remodeling.69 TGF‐β1 phosphorylates downstream effector proteins known as mothers against decapentaplegic (Smads; canonical pathway) or mitogen‐activated protein kinases (noncanonical pathway).10 Phosphorylation of Smad2/3 by activin‐like kinase 5 (ALK‐5) promotes type I collagen synthesis and cardiac fibroblast proliferation. Endoglin has been shown to mediate TGF‐β1 signaling through both ALK‐1/Smad1/5/8 and ALK‐5/Smad2/3 pathways.67 In contrast to membrane‐bound endoglin, the extracellular domain of endoglin can be cleaved by matrix metalloproteinase‐14 to form soluble endoglin (sol‐Eng), which antagonizes TGF‐β1 signaling.6,1112 Levels of soluble endoglin are elevated in heart failure (HF) and pulmonary hypertension.1314 Endoglin‐null mice die at embryonic day 10.5 as the result of impaired cardiovascular development and extraembryonic angiogenesis.15 In contrast, endoglin heterozygous mice (Eng+/−) are viable and have reduced total body levels of endoglin.16 A functional role for endoglin in the RV has never been studied.

The calcium‐dependent serine/threonine phosphatase, calcineurin, is another critical mediator of maladaptive cardiac remodeling, defined by excessive fibrosis and hypertrophy.1719 Recent studies have shown that calcineurin increases expression of the canonical transient receptor protein channel 6 (TRPC‐6), which triggers calcium influx and subsequent calcineurin activation, thereby setting up a self‐propagating mechanism for pathologic hypertrophy, fibrosis, and increased mortality in HF.1824 Very recently, noncanonical TGF‐β1 signaling through TRPC‐6 was reported to be an important stimulus for calcineurin‐mediated alpha‐smooth muscle cell actin (α‐SMA) expression, a marker of myofibroblast transformation and a critical component of cardiac fibrosis.2526 We also recently reported that RVPO increases TGF‐β1 and calcineurin expression and is associated with increased RV fibrosis, hypertrophy, and reduced RV stroke volume, despite preserved contractility.27 These findings suggest that targeting TGF‐β1 and calcineurin/TRPC‐6 signaling may be an important approach to limit adverse RV remodeling. Calcineurin and TRPC‐6 activity in the RV remains largely unexplored, and endoglin‐dependent regulation of calcineurin expression in RV remodeling has not been studied.

We hypothesized that RVPO promotes expression of the TGF‐β1 coreceptor, endoglin, which mediates calcineurin‐dependent myofibroblast transformation through TRPC‐6 in the RV. To explore this hypothesis, we employed several models of RVPO in both Eng+/− mice and wild‐type (WT) mice treated with a neutralizing antibody (Ab) against endoglin.

Methods

Reagents

Polyclonal Abs against human calcineurin, α‐SMA, phosphorylated (p)Smad3, and total Smad2/3 were purchased from Cell Signaling Technology (2614S; Danvers, MA), Sigma‐Aldrich (A2547; St. Louis, MO), and Cell Signaling Technology (8769S and 3102S), respectively. Polyclonal Abs against mouse endoglin, type I collagen, and α‐SMA were purchased from R&D Systems (BAF1320; Minneapolis, MN), Santa Cruz Biotechnology (SC‐25974; Santa Cruz, CA), and Sigma‐Aldrich (A2547), respectively. Rabbit polyclonal Abs to mouse calcineurin (2614S) were purchased from Cell Signaling Technology. Polyclonal Abs to mouse pSmad3 (9520), and phosphorylated extracellular signal‐regulated kinases 1 and 2 (pERK1/2; SC‐134900) were purchased from Cell Signaling Technology and Santa Cruz Biotechnology. Polyclonal Abs to mouse total Smad3 (SC‐101154) and total ERK (SC‐135900) were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology. Sugen (SU5416) was purchased from Sigma‐Aldrich. A neutralizing immunoglobulin G (IgG)1 Ab that binds human and mouse endoglin (TRC105) was provided by Tracon Pharmaceuticals (San Diego, CA). An ELISA kit for the detection of active TGF‐β1 levels in mice was purchased from R&D Systems.

Mouse Model of Pharmacologically Induced RVPO

Animals were treated in compliance with the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (National Academy of Science), and protocols were approved by the Tufts Medical Center Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (Boston, MA). Adult, male, 12‐ to 14‐week‐old C57BL/6 WT and congenic Eng+/− mice received once‐weekly intraperitoneal injections of Sugen and were exposed to either normoxic conditions (room air) or chronic normobaric hypoxia (10% O2), as previously described.28 After 5 weeks of exposure to either Sugen+Normoxia (Su‐Norm) or Sugen+Hypoxia (Su‐Hypox), mice underwent hemodynamic analysis with a RV conductance catheter (Millar Instruments Inc., Houston, TX), as described below, and tissue was then obtained for further analysis. Eng+/− mice were generously provided by Dr Michelle Letarte, University of Toronto (Toronto, Ontario, Canada).

Mouse Model of Surgically Induced RVPO

Adult, male, 12‐ to 14‐week‐old C57BL/6 WT and congenic Eng+/− mice underwent pulmonary artery constriction (PAC), as previously described.27,29 Specifically, mice were intubated using a 24G angiocath and mechanically ventilated (Harvard Apparatus, Holliston, MA) at 95 breaths per minute with a tidal volume of 0.3 mL with 2.0% to 2.5% Isoflurane and 100% flow‐through oxygen. Depth of anesthesia was monitored by assessing palpebral reflex, toe pinch, respirations, and general response to touch. Using a sterile technique, a left thoracotomy was performed to isolate and encircle the main pulmonary artery using a 7‐0 nylon suture that was then tied tightly around a presterilized, blunt‐end needle. After deairing, the thorax was closed with layered 6‐0 Dexon sutures to eliminate the risk of pneumothorax. Postoperative analgesia was immediately provided with buprenorphine (0.1 mL), which was continued twice‐daily and as needed for an additional 72 hours. Severe RVPO was induced by PAC with a 25G needle for 7 days in WT and Eng+/− mice. To investigate the role of endoglin in RVPO, WT mice received 15 mg/kg of either a neutralizing Ab to endoglin (N‐Eng; TRC105; Tracon Pharmaceuticals) or an IgG1 control Ab (IgG Ab; R&D Systems) by single intraperitoneal injection 1 day before and 3 days after induction of severe RVPO. To study the effect of blocking endoglin activity after induction of RVPO, WT mice were randomized to receive biweekly intraperitoneal injections for 3 weeks of 15 mg/kg of N‐Eng antibody or IgG control Ab beginning 3 weeks after induction of moderate RVPO using a 23G needle for PAC. The Ab dose was based on a previous clinical study demonstrating effective saturation of endoglin receptors.30 After 7 days of severe PAC or 3 to 6 weeks of moderate RVPO, mice underwent hemodynamic analysis with an RV conductance catheter (Millar Instruments), as described below, and tissue was then obtained for further analysis.

Nuclear Factor of Activated T‐Cell Activity In Vivo

Nuclear factor of activated T‐cell (NFAT)‐luciferase (NFAT‐Luc) mice with nine copies of an NFAT‐binding site from the interleukin (IL)‐4 promoter (5′‐TGGAAAATT‐3′) inserted upstream of the luciferase reporter gene, driven by the α‐myosin heavy‐chain promoter,17 were purchased from The Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, ME). Eng+/−‐NFAT luciferase reporter mice were generated by crossing Eng+/− mice with the NFAT‐luciferase mice. Severe RVPO was induced by PAC in 10‐ to 12‐week‐old Eng+/+‐NFAT‐Luc and Eng+/−‐NFAT‐Luc. After 7 days of severe PAC, RV tissue was then obtained for quantification of luciferase activity using firefly luciferase assays that were carried out as follows: 20 μL of whole RV tissue lysate was added to 100 μL of firefly luciferase assay buffer (Promega, Madison, WI). Samples were placed in a luminometer (Luminoskan Ascent; Labsystems Oy, Helsinki, Finland), and luminescence was determined in triplicate per sample over a 10‐second interval.

Hemodynamic Assessment of RV Function

All animals underwent terminal hemodynamic evaluation. Right heart catheterization was performed at the time of sacrifice in all animals. Mice were anesthetized with 2.0% isoflurane administered by a noninvasive nose cone. Body temperature was monitored by a rectal thermistor probe and maintained at 37.5°C with heating pads and a cycling heat lamp. In the supine position, the right common carotid and right external jugular vein were surgically isolated. Silk ties were placed at the distal ends of both vessels while overhand loops were placed at the proximal ends with 7‐0 nylon. A Millar PVR‐1035 (Millar Instruments) mouse conductance catheter was used for RV recordings. Before insertion, conductance catheter calibration was performed using the cuvette method with freshly heparinized warm blood, then zeroed in warm saline as previously described.3132 A transverse venotomy was performed using iris scissors at the proximal end of the external jugular vein. The PVR‐1035 catheter was advanced through the superior vena cava and right atrium into the RV, leaving the chest wall intact. Once hemodynamic stability was achieved, steady‐state baseline conditions were recorded from the RV. Stroke volume was calculated as end‐diastolic minus end‐systolic volume. Arterial elastance was calculated under steady‐state conditions as end‐systolic pressure/stroke volume. Tau, a measure of instantaneous isovolumic relaxation, was calculated using the Glantz method as P(t)=P0e−t/τE+ Pα, where P is pressure at time t, P0 is the amplitude constant, τE is the Glantz relaxation constant, and Pα is the nonzero asymptote resulting from pleural and pericardial pressure. RV compliance was calculated as stroke volume divided by peak RV pressure. Pressure‐volume loop acquisition and analysis was performed using IOX software (emka TECHNOLOGIES, Paris, France). After completion of the hemodynamic study, with the animal still under isoflurane anesthesia, the chest was rapidly opened, and the mouse was euthanized by arresting the heart in diastole with 0.3 mL of 1 N of KCL injected directly into the LV. The heart was then removed and processed for either biochemical or histologic analyses.

Histologic Quantification of Cardiac Hypertrophy and Fibrosis

RV collagen abundance was quantified by picrosirius red staining, as previously described.33 Cardiomyocyte cross‐sectional area was quantified as previously described.34

Loss‐of‐Function Studies in Cardiac Fibroblasts

Human RV (RVFB) and LV (LVFB) fibroblasts were isolated from myocardial tissue harvested during cardiac surgery at Tufts Medical Center, and mouse RVFB and LVFB were isolated from WT and Eng+/− mice. Fibroblasts were stimulated with TGF‐β1 for analysis, as previously described.6,3536 For calcineurin inhibition studies, human RVFB were pretreated with 5 nM of cyclosporine A (CsA) or vehicle control for 24 hours in fibroblast basal medium (FBM) without supplementation, followed by stimulation with TGF‐β1 (10 ng/mL) for 24 hours.37 For TRPC‐6 silencing experiments, 50 μmol/L of siRNA stock was diluted to 5 nmol/L in Optimem (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) and combined with 2 μL of Lipofectamine (Invitrogen) diluted in 98 μL of Optimem. After 20 minutes of incubation, cells were exposed to human TRPC‐6 siRNA (Catalog No.: 439420; Ambion, Austin, TX) or scrambled siRNA (negative control; Catalog No.: 4390844; Ambion). After 48 hours after transfection, cells were treated with TGF‐β1 (10 ng/mL) for 16 to 24 hours, then harvested for analysis. For neutralizing Ab studies in vitro, human RVFB and LVFB were pretreated with 10, 50, or 100 μg/mL of either an N‐Eng Ab or control IgG Ab for 24 hours in FBM before stimulation with TGF‐β1 (10 ng/mL). After 24 hours, cells were harvested for analysis. The Ab dose was based on previous studies demonstrating effective neutralization of endoglin activity in endothelium.30 All RVFB and LVFB stimulation studies were conducted in triplicate with cells cultured to within three lineage passes only.

Real‐Time Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction

For all cell‐based reverse‐transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT‐PCR) experiments, total RNA was extracted directly using Trizol (Invitrogen), then converted to cDNA using a High Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription Kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). For all RT‐PCR experiments, samples were quantified in triplicate using 40 cycles performed at 94°C for 30 seconds, 60°C for 45 seconds, and 72°C for 45 seconds using an ABI Prism® 7900 (Applied Biosystems Inc) Sequence Detection System with appropriate primers (Table 1), as previously described.6,34

Table 1.

Primers

Mouse Primers
Type I collagen
Forward AAG GGT CCC TCT GGA GAA CC
Reverse TCT AGA GCC AGG GAG ACC CA
Calcineurin (CN‐PP)
Forward CCACAGGGATGTTGCCTAGTG
Reverse GTCCCGTGGTTCTCAGTGGTA
Endoglin
Forward CTG CCA ATG CTG TGC GTG AA
Reverse GCT GGA GTC GTA GGC CAA GT
α‐SMA
Forward GCATCCACGAAACCACCTA
Reverse CACGAGTAACAAATCAAAGC
MYH7
Forward ATG TGC CGG ACC TTG GAA
Reverse CCT CGG GTT AGC TGA GAG ATC A
TRPC‐6
Forward GGC GGC TCT CTA AAG GCT G
Reverse TGG GGT AGT AGC CAT ACG GTG
Human primers
Type I collagen
Forward GTC GAG GGC CAA GAC GAA G
Reverse CAG ATC ACG TCA TCG CAC AAC
Calcineurin (CN‐PP)
Forward TGCATCAATTCTTCGACAGG
Reverse AAGGCCCACAAATACAGCAC
α‐SMA
Forward CCGACCGAATGCAGAAGGA
Reverse ACAGAGTATTTGCGCTCCGAA
TRPC‐6
Forward GCCAATGAGCATCTGGAAAT
Reverse TGGAGTCACATCATGGGAGA

α‐SMA indicates alpha‐smooth muscle antigen; TRPC‐6, transient receptor protein channel 6.

Immunoblot Analysis (Western)

Total protein was extracted and quantified from tissue homogenates or cultured cells, as previously described.6,35 Immunoblot analysis was then performed, as previously described, using Abs for mouse targeted proteins.6,35

Statistical Analysis

Results are presented as mean±SD. Intergroup comparisons were made for each variable with a two‐way ANOVA, followed by a post‐hoc Bonferonni's correction for multiple comparisons (Tables 2 through 5). An alpha level of P<0.01 was considered to indicate a significant effect or between‐groups difference. Multiple comparisons versus a control group were performed using one‐way ANOVA, followed by post‐hoc analysis with Dunnett's method (Figures 1 through 7). Kaplan‐Meier's analysis with log‐rank testing was employed for survival analysis (Figures 4C and 7A). All statistical analyses were performed using SigmaStat software (Version 3.1; Systat Software Inc., Richmond, CA). An alpha level of P<0.05 was considered to indicate a significant effect or between‐groups difference.

Table 2.

Characterization of Right Ventricular Pressure Overload Induced by Sugen and Hypoxia in Wild‐Type and Eng+/− Mice

Wild Type Eng+/−
Su‐Norm Su‐Hypox Su‐Norm Su‐Hypox
Total body weight, g 27±2 27±1 29±2 28±2
RV weight/tibial length, g/mm 1.2±0.4 1.4±0.4 1.4±0.1 1.5±0.1
LV weight/tibial length, g/mm 4.8±3 4.4±3 4.9±2 5.3±1
Hemodynamic variables
RV systolic pressure, mm Hg 23±2 36±2 24±4 34±3
RV end‐diastolic pressure (mm Hg) 2±1 3±1 3±3 2±2
RV +dp/dt, mm Hg/sec 2259±217 3203±456* 2476±257 2924±156*
RV −dp/dt, mm Hg/sec 2162±149 3212±642 2333±418 3100±493
RV stroke volume, μL 7±3 8±3 8±1 8±2
Cardiac output, mL/min 3794±1827 3898±1670 4150±1345 3995±1529
Heart rate, beats per min 507±37 504±28 514±52 506±53

LV indicates left ventricular; RV, right ventricular.

*P<0.01 versus Su‐Norm (n=6/group).

Table 5.

Characterization of Chronic Right Ventricular Pressure Overload Induced by Moderate Pulmonary Artery Constriction in Wild‐Type Mice Treated With Either a Neutralizing Antibody Against Endoglin (N‐Eng Ab) or IgG‐Isotype Control Antibody (IgG Ab)

Sham PAC
3 weeks 6 weeks+IgG Ab 6 weeks+N‐Eng Ab
Total body weight, g 31±1 27±2* 27±1* 27±2*
RV weight/tibial length, g/mm 1.4±0.5 2.7±0.5* 2.7±0.4* 2.5±0.4*
LV weight/tibial length, g/mm 5.4±0.5 3.5±0.1* 4.1±0.1* 4.5±0.2*
Hemodynamic variables
RV systolic pressure, mm Hg 26±1 70±5* 69±10* 69±14*
RV end‐diastolic pressure, mm Hg 1±1 4±2 2±1 2±1
RV +dp/dt, mm Hg/sec 2212±52 4836±929* 4215±674* 4072±875*
RV −dp/dt, mm Hg/sec 2115±64 4171±278* 4345±818* 3916±875*
RV stroke volume, μL 9±2 3±1* 3±2* 3±2*
Cardiac output, mL/min 4.3±1 1.5±1* 1.3±0.5* 1.4±0.6*
Heart rate, beats per min 500±81 592±83 527±69 550±52

PAC indicates pulmonary artery constriction; LV, left ventricular; RV, right ventricular.

*P<0.01 versus sham (n=6/group).

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Calcineurin regulates myofibroblast transformation and TRPC‐6 expression in right ventricular fibroblasts. A, Western blots showing calcineurin, α‐SMA, pSmad3, total Smad3, and GAPDH expression in human right ventricular fibroblasts (RVFB) after stimulation with TGF‐β1 (10 ng/mL for 16 to 24 hours) in the presence and absence of cyclosporine (CS). B and D, mRNA levels of calcineurin, α‐SMA, and TRPC‐6 in human RVFB after stimulation with TGF‐β1 in the presence and absence of CS (n=3/group). E, Western blot showing silencing of TRPC‐6 in human RVFB. F, Western blot showing calcineurin and α‐SMA levels in human RVFB after TGF‐β1 stimulation in the presence and absence of a siRNA against TRPC‐6 (siTRPC‐6). *P<0.05 versus vehicle; P<0.05 versus TGF‐β1 stimulation; P<0.05 versus WT+TGF‐β1 stimulation. α‐SMA indicates α‐smooth muscle antigen; TGF‐β1, transforming growth factor beta 1; TRPC‐6, transient receptor protein channel 6.

Figure 7.

Figure 7.

Reduced endoglin expression limits calcineurin activity in right ventricular pressure overload. Luciferase activity in right ventricular lysates from Eng+/+‐NFAT‐Luc and Eng+/−‐NFAT‐Luc mice subjected to 7 days of severe RVPO. *P<0.05 versus Eng+/+‐NFAT‐Luc Sham; P<0.05 versus Eng+/+‐NFAT‐Luc PAC. PAC indicates pulmonary artery constriction; RVPO, RV pressure overload.

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Reduced endoglin expression improves survival after right ventricular pressure overload. A and B, Levels of endoglin mRNA and protein expression in WT and Eng+/− mice after PAC (n=6/group). C, Right ventricular systolic pressure in WT and Eng+/− mice after PAC (n=6/group). D, Right ventricular stroke volume in WT and Eng+/− mice after PAC (n=6/group). E, Total body weight in WT and Eng+/− mice after PAC (n=6/group). F, Kaplan‐Meier's survival curves in WT and Eng+/− mice after PAC (n=12/group). *P<0.05 versus sham; P<0.05 versus WT versus Eng+/− sham; P<0.05 Wt versus Eng+/− PAC. PAC indicates pulmonary artery constriction; RV, right ventricular; WT, wild type.

Results

Endoglin Promotes TGF‐β1‐Mediated Calcineurin Expression and Myofibroblast Conversion in RV Fibroblasts

We first explored a role for calcineurin as a mediator of myofibroblast transformation in the RV. Human RVFB were stimulated with TGF‐β1 in the presence or absence of the calcineurin inhibitor, CsA. Pretreatment with cyclosporine attenuated TGF‐β1‐mediated increases in protein and mRNA levels of calcineurin and α‐SMA (Figure 1A through 1C). TGF‐β1 stimulation also increased TRPC‐6 mRNA expression in human RVFB, which was prevented by cyclosporine treatment (Figure 1D). To examine the role of TRPC‐6 in RV myofibroblast transformation, we employed a siRNA against TRPC‐6 (siTRPC‐6), which achieved a greater than 75% knockdown of TRPC‐6 protein expression in RVFB (Figure 1E). Silencing TRPC‐6 attenuated TGF‐β1‐mediated up‐regulation of calcineurin and α‐SMA in human RVFB (Figure 1F). These data indicate that TGF‐β1 increases expression of TRPC‐6 and α‐SMA in a calcineurin‐dependent manner in human RV fibroblasts.

Next, to explore the dependence of calcineurin expression on endoglin in human RVFB and LVFB, cells were treated with TGF‐β1 in the presence of increasing concentrations of an N‐Eng Ab (Figure 2A through 2B). Neutralizing endoglin activity blocked TGF‐β1‐induced calcineurin and α‐SMA protein expression in human RVFB, not LVFB. Neutralizing endoglin attenuated pSmad3 expression in both human RVFB and LVFB. To further examine the role of endoglin as a positive regulator of calcineurin in RVFB and LVFB, cells were isolated from WT and Eng+/− mice (Figure 2C through 2D). In WT RVFB and LVFB, TGF‐β1 stimulated calcineurin and α‐SMA mRNA expression, which was prevented in Eng+/− RVFB, not LVFB (Figure 2C). TGF‐β1 also up‐regulated protein levels of calcineurin and α‐SMA in WT RVFB and LVFB, which was attenuated in Eng+/− RVFB, but not in Eng+/− LVFB (Figure 2D). These findings support that endoglin is required for TGF‐β1‐induced calcineurin expression and myofibroblast transformation in RVFB, a critical component of cardiac fibrosis.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Reduced endoglin activity limits calcineurin expression and myofibroblast transformation in right ventricular fibroblasts. A and B, Western blots showing calcineurin, α‐SMA, pSmad3, and GAPDH levels in fibroblasts from human right (RVFB) and left (LVFB) ventricular fibroblasts after TGF‐β1 stimulation in the presence and absence of increasing concentrations of a neutralizing endoglin antibody (N‐Eng Ab). Quantification of calcineurin and a‐SMA levels in human RVFB and LVFB (n=3/group). C, mRNA levels of calcineurin and α‐SMA in right (RVFB) and left (LVFB) ventricular fibroblasts derived from WT and Eng+/− mice after TGF‐β1 stimulation (n=6/group). D, Western blots showing calcineurin and α‐SMA levels after TGF‐β1 stimulation in RVFB and LVFB from WT and Eng+/− mice. D and E, Quantification of calcineurin and α‐SMA protein levels in RVFB and LVFB from WT and Eng+/− mice stimulated with TGF‐β1. *P<0.05 versus vehicle; P<0.05 versus TGF‐β1 stimulation; P<0.05 versus LVFB+TGF‐β1 stimulation. α‐SMA indicates α‐smooth muscle antigen; TGF‐β1, transforming growth factor beta 1; WT, wild type.

Reduced Endoglin Expression Preserves RV Function and Limits RV Fibrosis in a Model of Angio‐Obliterative Pulmonary Hypertension

To begin exploring a functional role for endoglin in RV remodeling, we studied the well‐established model of angio‐obliterative pulmonary hypertension induced by exposure to hypoxia and the anti‐vascular endothelial growth factor compound, Sugen, in WT, compared to Eng+/−, mice. All mice survived treatment with Sugen+Hypoxia for 5 weeks, and no significant change in total body weight, RV or LV weights, RV stroke volume, or cardiac output was observed between groups (Table 2). We observed increased RV systolic pressure (RVSP) in both WT and Eng+/− mice after 5 weeks of exposure to Sugen+Hypoxia (Figure 3A). No difference in RV dP/dtmax was observed between WT and Eng+/− groups treated with Sugen+Hypoxia, demonstrating a similar response to RVPO in both types of mice. WT mice exposed to Sugen+hypoxia developed evidence of abnormal diastolic RV function, including increased Tau (a measure of instantaneous isovolumic relaxation) and decreased RV compliance (Figure 3B and 3C), whereas Eng+/− mice demonstrated no change in Tau and relatively preserved RV compliance. To explore the mechanism for the differences in RV diastolic function, we examined RV fibrosis and calcineurin signaling. Exposure to Sugen+Hypoxia increased type I collagen mRNA expression and histologic levels of collagen abundance in WT, not Eng+/−, mice (Figure 3D through 3F). Calcineurin, TRPC‐6, and α‐SMA mRNA levels were increased by Sugen+Hypoxia in WT, not Eng+/−, mice (Figure 3G through 3I). These findings suggest that, despite identical degrees of RVPO, reduced endoglin expression in Eng+/− mice preserved indices of RV diastolic function, limited RV collagen accumulation, attenuated up‐regulation of calcineurin and TRPC‐6, and limited myofibroblast transformation in the RV.

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Reduced endoglin expression limits fibrosis and calcineurin expression in a murine model of angio‐obliterative pulmonary hypertension. A through C, Right ventricular systolic pressure, tau, and RV compliance in Eng+/+ and Eng+/− mice after 5 weeks of treatment with Sugen compound under normoxic (Su‐Norm) or hypoxic (Su‐Hypox) conditions (n=6/group). D, mRNA levels of type I collagen in WT and Eng+/− mice under Su‐Norm or Su‐Hypox conditions (n=6/group). E and F, Representative histologic staining for RV collagen abundance in Eng+/+ and Eng+/− mice under Su‐Norm or Su‐Hypox conditions. Quantification of percent RV fibrosis is shown (n=6/group). G, mRNA levels of calcineurin, TRPC‐6, and a‐SMA in RV tissue from WT and Eng+/− mice under Su‐Norm or Su‐Hypox conditions (n=6/group). *P<0.05 versus Eng+/+ Su‐Norm; P<0.05 versus Eng+/− Su‐Norm; P<0.05 Eng+/+ Su‐Hypox versus Eng+/− Su‐Hypox. α‐SMA indicates α‐smooth muscle antigen; RV, right ventricular; TRPC‐6, transient receptor protein channel 6; WT, wild type.

Reduced Endoglin Expression Preserves RV Function and Improves Survival in RVPO

Given the limited degree of RVF observed in the Sugen+Hypoxia model, we next explored the functional role of endoglin in a surgical model of severe RVPO induced by surgical constriction of the pulmonary artery (PAC) for 7 days in WT and Eng+/− mice. Compared to WT, baseline RV endoglin expression was lower in Eng+/− mice (Figure 4A and 4B). Compared to sham controls, PAC increased endoglin levels in the RV in WT mice, suggesting a direct effect of RVPO on endoglin expression. RVPO also increased endoglin expression in Eng+/− mice, but levels were significantly lower, compared to WT mice (Figure 4A and 4B). We next examined the functional impact of reduced endoglin levels in RVPO. Despite equally increased RVSP in both WT and Eng+/− mice after PAC, RV stroke volume was decreased in WT, but not Eng+/−, mice (Figure 4C through 4D). WT mice also manifested reduced total body weight after RVPO, whereas Eng+/− mice did not (Figure 4E). Eng+/− mice demonstrated substantially improved survival (100% vs. 58%, respectively; P=0.01), compared to WT mice after PAC (Figure 4F). These findings suggest that, despite identical degrees of RVPO, reduced endoglin expression in Eng+/− mice preserved RV function and improved survival.

Reduced Endoglin Expression Limits RV Fibrosis and Signaling by TGF‐β1 and Calcineurin in RVPO

To study the mechanism underlying improved survival in Eng+/− mice, we first examined changes in RV structure. RVPO increased RV mass in WT, but not Eng+/−, mice (Table 3). RVPO increased RV fibrosis in WT, but not Eng+/−, mice (Figure 5A and 5B). RV cardiomyocyte cross‐sectional area was also increased in both WT and Eng+/− mice after RVPO, but the degree of hypertrophy was lower in Eng+/− mice (Figure 5C and 5D). These findings suggest that endoglin regulates changes in RV structure in response to RVPO.

Table 3.

Characterization of Right Ventricular Pressure Overload Induced by Severe Pulmonary Artery Constriction in Wild‐Type and Eng+/− Mice

Wild Type Eng+/−
Sham (n=6) PAC (n=7) Sham (n=6) PAC (n=8)
Total body weight, g 35±2 24±2* 34±4 28±2
RV weight/tibial length, g/mm 1.4±0.1 3±0.1* 1.7±0.3 2.3±0.1
LV weight/tibial length, g/mm 6±0.4 4±0.3* 5±0.2 4±0.3*,
Hemodynamic variables
RV systolic pressure, mm Hg 21±6 50±4* 24±3 46±9
RV end‐diastolic pressure, mm Hg 4±2 8±4 2±1 4±2
RV +dp/dt, mm Hg/sec 2358±392 3328±1163* 2064±343 3517±1118*
RV −dp/dt, mm Hg/sec 2514±187 2613±849 2079±341 2715±622*
RV stroke volume, μL 9±3 4±1* 8±2 7±1
Cardiac output, mL/min 5±1 2±1* 4±1 4±1
Heart rate, beats per min 540±62 532±51 509±13 521±24

PAC indicates pulmonary artery constriction; LV, left ventricular; RV, right ventricular.

*P<0.01 versus sham; P<0.01 versus wild‐type PAC.

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

Reduced endoglin expression limits RV fibrosis and hypertrophy after right ventricular pressure overload. A and B, Representative histologic staining for RV collagen abundance in WT and Eng+/− mice after PAC. Quantification of RV fibrosis after PAC is shown (n=6/group). C and D, Representative histological staining for RV cardiomyocyte hypertrophy in WT and Eng+/− mice after PAC. Quantification of cardiomyocyte cross‐sectional area after PAC is shown (n=6/group). *P<0.05 versus sham; P<0.05 versus WT‐PAC. PAC indicates pulmonary artery constriction; RV, right ventricular; WT, wild type.

Next, we studied TGF‐β1 signaling in RVPO. Despite equally increased active TGF‐β1 protein levels in WT and Eng+/− mice (Figure 6A), levels of type I collagen, pSmad3, and pERK1/2 were increased in WT mice, but not Eng+/− mice (Figure 6B through 6D). We observed reduced levels of calcineurin protein expression in the RV from Eng+/− mice, compared to WT, after RVPO (Figure 6E). Levels of downstream targets of calcineurin activity, including MYH7 and TRPC‐6, were also reduced in Eng+/− mice, compared to WT, after RVPO (Figure 6F and 6G). Levels of α‐SMA mRNA were also increased in WT, but not Eng+/−, mice after RVPO, indicating reduced fibroblast‐to‐myofibroblast conversion in Eng+/− mice (Figure 6H). To further explore whether endoglin regulates calcineurin activity, RVPO was induced in Eng+/+‐NFAT‐Luc and Eng+/−‐NFAT‐Luc mice. RVPO increased luciferase activity in total RV lysates from Eng+/+‐NFAT‐Luc, not Eng+/−‐NFAT‐Luc, mice (Figure 7). These observations suggest that, in addition to regulating canonical and noncanonical TGF‐β1 pathways that promote cardiac fibrosis, reduced endoglin levels in the RV limit calcineurin expression and activity, including myofibroblast transformation. These findings support an important role for endoglin‐mediated regulation of TGF‐β1 and calcineurin activity in RV remodeling.

Figure 6.

Figure 6.

Reduced endoglin expression limits TGF‐β1 signaling and calcineurin activity in the RV after right ventricular pressure overload. A, Levels of active TGF‐β1 in RV protein lysates from WT and Eng+/− mice (n=6/group). B through D, Quantification of RV type I collagen, pSmad3, and pERK1/2 protein levels in WT and Eng+/− mice after PAC (n=6/group). Representative western blots are shown. E, Levels of RV calcineurin protein in WT and Eng+/− mice after PAC (n=6/group). A representative western blot is shown. F and H, Levels of RV MYH7, TRPC‐6, and α‐SMA mRNA expression in WT and Eng+/− mice after PAC (n=6/group). *P<0.05 versus sham; P<0.05 versus WT‐PAC. α‐SMA indicates alpha‐smooth muscle antigen; PAC, pulmonary artery constriction; RV, right ventricular; TGF‐β1, transforming growth factor beta 1; TRPC‐6, transient receptor protein channel 6; WT, wild type.

Neutralizing Endoglin Activity Prevents RV Fibrosis and Improves Survival in RVPO

To further explore the role of endoglin in mediating calcineurin expression in RVPO, WT mice were pretreated with a N‐Eng Ab or control IgG before induction of severe RVPO by PAC. Treatment with the N‐Eng Ab improved survival after 7 days of severe RVPO, compared to treatment with the IgG control (Figure 8A). Despite equally increased RVSPs in both groups (Table 4), RV fibrosis was increased in WT mice treated with the IgG control, but not in mice treated with N‐Eng Ab after severe RVPO (Figure 8B and 8C). RV cardiomyocyte cross‐sectional area was also increased in both groups after PAC, but less cardiomyocyte hypertrophy was observed in WT mice receiving the N‐Eng Ab (Figure 8D). RV mass was also increased in both groups, but the degree of hypertrophy was attenuated in N‐Eng Ab‐treated mice after RVPO (Table 4). Consistent with observations in Eng+/− mice, WT mice treated with the N‐Eng Ab showed reduced protein levels of type I collagen, pSmad3, pERK1/2, and calcineurin levels in the RV, compared to the IgG, group after RVPO (Figure 8E through 8H). Downstream targets of calcineurin, including mRNA levels of MYH7, TRPC‐6, and α‐SMA, were also reduced in the N‐Eng Ab group, compared to the IgG group, after RVPO (Figure 8I through 8K).

Figure 8.

Figure 8.

Neutralizing endoglin activity improves survival and limits the development of RV fibrosis after right ventricular pressure overload. A, Kaplan‐Meier's survival curves in WT mice treated with an IgG control Ab or N‐ Eng Ab after PAC (n=18/group). B and C, Representative histological staining for RV collagen abundance in IgG vs. N‐Eng Ab‐treated mice after PAC. Quantification of RV fibrosis after PAC is shown (n=6/group). D, Quantification of cardiomyocyte cross‐sectional area after PAC is shown (n=6/group). E through H, Quantification of RV type I collagen, pSmad3, pERK1/2, and calcineurin protein levels in IgG versus N‐Eng Ab‐treated mice after PAC (n=6/group). Representative western blots are shown. I through K, Levels of RV MYH7, TRPC‐6, and α‐SMA mRNA expression in IgG versus N‐Eng Ab‐treated mice after PAC (n=6/group). *P<0.05 versus sham; P<0.05 versus WT+N‐Eng Ab PAC. α‐SMA indicates alpha‐smooth muscle antigen; PAC, pulmonary artery constriction; RV, right ventricular; TRPC‐6, transient receptor protein channel 6; WT, wild type.

Table 4.

Characterization of Right Ventricular Pressure Overload Induced by Severe Pulmonary Artery Constriction in Wild‐Type Mice Treated With Either a Neutralizing Antibody Against Endoglin (N‐Eng Ab) or IgG‐Isotype Control Antibody (IgG)

Wild Type Wild Type+N‐Eng Ab
Sham PAC Sham PAC
Total body weight, g 29±2 23±2* 28±1 24±2*
RV weight/tibial length, g/mm 1.5±0.01 2.5±0.01* 1.5±0.01 1.9±0.01*,
LV weight/tibial length, g/mm 6±0.01 4±0.01* 6±0.01 5±0.02*
Hemodynamic variables
RV systolic pressure, mm Hg 22±3 48±4* 24±3 53±9*
RV end‐diastolic pressure, mm Hg 4±1 7±4 3±2 4±2
RV +dp/dt, mm Hg/sec 2374±429 3189±982 2171±283 4130±563*
RV −dp/dt, mm Hg/sec 2419±304 2810±891 1963±257 3287±350*
RV stroke volume, μL 8±3 4±1* 8±2 5±1*
Cardiac output, mL/min 4.3±1 1.8±1* 4.0±1 2.4±0.2
Heart rate, beats per min 538±25 548±33 512±59 541±52

PAC indicates pulmonary artery constriction; LV, left ventricular; RV, right ventricular.

*P<0.01 versus sham; P<0.01 versus wild‐ype PAC (n=6/group).

Neutralizing Endoglin Activity Reverses RV Fibrosis in Established RVPO

To study the potential clinical utility of blocking endoglin activity as an approach to reduce RV fibrosis after established RVPO, WT mice subjected to moderate RVPO for 3 weeks were randomized to receive either the N‐Eng Ab or IgG control for an additional 3 weeks (Figure 9A). After 3 weeks of moderate RVPO, total body weight was reduced, whereas RV mass and systolic pressure were increased and RV stroke volume decreased, compared to sham controls (Table 5). RV fibrosis, type I collagen, and calcineurin expression were also increased, compared to sham controls (Figure 9B through 9F). After an additional 3 weeks (6 weeks total) of moderate RVPO, both IgG‐ and N‐Eng Ab‐treated groups had persistently increased RV mass and RVSP with reduced cardiac output (Table 5). No mortality was observed after moderate RVPO in either group at any time point. RV fibrosis progressively worsened in mice treated within the IgG group, but was significantly reduced in the N‐Eng Ab‐treated group (Figure 9B and 9C). Type I collagen and calcineurin protein expression also increased progressively in the IgG group, but were reduced in the N‐Eng Ab group (Figure 9D through 9F). These findings support that blocking endoglin activity reverses established RV fibrosis in chronic RVPO in mice.

Figure 9.

Figure 9.

Neutralizing endoglin activity reverses cardiac fibrosis after chronic right ventricular pressure overload. A, Schematic of randomization to treatment with a N‐Eng Ab or IgG control Ab after 3 weeks of PAC in WT mice. B and C, Quantification of RV fibrosis and representative histologic staining for RV collagen abundance in IgG‐ versus N‐anti‐Eng Ab‐treated mice after moderate RVPO (n=6/group). D through F, Quantification of type I collagen and calcineurin protein levels in WT mice after moderate RVPO for 3 and 6 weeks in the presence and absence of either an IgG control Ab or N‐ Eng Ab. Representative western blots are shown. *P<0.05 versus sham; P<0.05 versus 3 weeks RVPO; P<0.05 versus 6 weeks RVPO+IgG. PAC indicates pulmonary artery constriction; RV, right ventricular; RVPO, RV pressure overload; WT, wild type.

Discussion

This is the first report to establish a role for endoglin in RV remodeling. Our central finding is that endoglin modulates TGF‐β1 signaling through canonical, noncanonical, and calcineurin‐mediated pathways in the RV and could be a novel therapeutic target to limit RV fibrosis and improve survival in diseases characterized by RVPO (Figure 10). We report several novel findings: (1) Endoglin is necessary for TGF‐β1‐induced increase in expression of TRPC‐6 and α‐SMA by a calcineurin‐dependent mechanism in human RV fibroblasts; (2) TRPC‐6 mediates a feedback loop promoting calcineurin expression and myofibroblast transformation in human RV fibroblasts that is also dependent on endoglin; (3) in Eng+/− mice exposed to Sugen+Hypoxia, reduced endoglin activity improved RV diastolic function, limited fibrosis, and attenuated expression of calcineurin, TRPC‐6, and α‐SMA; (4) in the most severe model of surgical pressure overload, reduced endoglin activity, induced either by genetic means or by treatment with a neutralizing Ab, improved survival, reduced RV fibrosis, and limited TGF‐β1 signaling through canonical, noncanonical, and calcineurin‐mediated pathways in the RV; and (5) in mice with established RV fibrosis, neutralizing endoglin activity reversed RV fibrosis and attenuated expression of both type I collagen and calcineurin. Given the importance of calcineurin and TRPC‐6 in adaptive and maladaptive cardiac remodeling, these findings identify endoglin as a regulator of TGF‐β1‐signaling cascades involved in RV remodeling and further show that targeting endoglin activity may improve RV function in HF or lung disease.

Figure 10.

Figure 10.

Reduced endoglin activity limits TGF‐β1‐induced calcineurin expression and myofibroblast transformation in right ventricular fibroblasts. Postulated mechanism by which endoglin promotes RV fibrosis by facilitating TGF‐β1 signaling in response to pressure overload through canonical and noncanonical pathways, including calcineurin‐mediated myofibroblast transformation in RVFB. In contrast, reduced endoglin activity attenuates TGF‐β1 signaling through canonical, noncanonical, and calcineurin pathways and limits myofibroblast transformation and fibrosis, thereby improving survival. α‐SMA indicates alpha‐smooth muscle antigen; RV, right ventricular; RVBF, right ventricular fibroblasts; TGF‐β1, transforming growth factor‐beta 1; TRPC‐6, transient receptor protein channel 6.

Previous studies of TGF‐β1 activity in cardiac remodeling have focused on LVF; yet, TGF‐β1 signaling in the RV remains largely unexplored. A majority of our understanding of the mechanisms governing RV remodeling stem primarily from data generated in models of LVF. However, substantial differences between the RV and LV exist that support the potential for the two ventricles to have distinct responses to injury, including: (1) the developmental origin of the RV from a heart field distinct from the LV3839; (2) a thin RV free wall with susceptibility to increased wall stress40; (3) a greater dependence of the RV stroke volume on afterload4042; and (4) enhanced RV contractile resilience to pressure overload.4344 We recently reported that endoglin expression is increased in the LV of patients with LHF and is restricted to LV fibroblasts and endothelial cells, as opposed to cardiomyocytes.6 We also showed that reduced endoglin expression attenuates TGF‐β1 signaling through Smad2/3, limits LV fibrosis, and preserves cardiomyocyte hypertrophy in a murine model of LVF induced by thoracic aortic constriction. The net effect of this adaptive LV remodeling pattern was improved survival and preserved cardiac function in Eng+/−, compared to Eng+/+, mice after chronic LHF. In this study, reduced endoglin expression had no effect on LV expression of calcineurin. Despite all that is known in the LV, regulation of profibrotic signaling in the RV remains poorly understood and the role of endoglin in the RV has never been studied.

These new studies exploring the role of endoglin in the RV response to pressure overload reveal that, although some similarities exist with the LV, there are also pathways unique to endoglin's role in the RV. Indeed, endoglin limited TGF‐β1 signaling by Smad3 and ERK1/2 in both ventricles; however, in contrast to our previous observations in the LV, we now report that endoglin regulates TGF‐β1‐induced calcineurin expression and activity in the RV. Irrespective of the mechanism for RVPO, we uniformly observed that reduced endoglin activity attenuated calcineurin expression and activity, as evidenced by reduced levels of downstream targets of calcineurin activity, including MYH7 and TRPC‐6. These observations open an exciting avenue for exploration of endoglin‐dependent, RV‐specific signaling involving two potent cardiac remodeling pathways, namely, TGF‐β1 and calcineurin.

The TRPC family of Ca2+ permeable channels includes 7 members and can increase intracellular calcium levels ([Ca2+]i), which activates calcineurin expression in fibroblasts and promotes myofibroblast transformation.4546 Several previous reports have established that TRPC‐6 amplifies pathological signaling by participating in a self‐propagating feed‐forward circuit mediated by calcineurin activity and is therefore a potentially important target of therapy in cardiac remodeling.20,26,47 No studies to date have examined the functional role of TRPC‐6 in RVPO. We now introduce a novel signaling pathway involving endoglin‐dependent regulation of calcineurin‐mediated myofibroblast transformation in the pressure‐overloaded RV (Figure 9).

In this report, we studied both pharmacologically and surgically induced models of RVPO. Existing models of pulmonary hypertension include treatment with Sugen, intratracheal bleomycin, monocrotaline, and hypoxia. Each of these models confirms that RVPO is associated with RV hypertrophy and fibrosis.4850 More recent clinical data from patients with pulmonary hypertension also confirm that RV dysfunction resulting from pressure overload is dominated by a loss of diastolic properties as a result of RV fibrosis and hypertrophy.3,5152 Using a conductance catheter inserted into the RV of closed‐chest mice after treatment with Sugen under hypoxic conditions, we observed abnormal diastolic properties with relative preserved instantaneous contractile force, as measured by dP/dtmax. In Eng+/− mice, these diastolic abnormalities were attenuated. To further explore the specific effects of pressure overload on RV remodeling, we then uncoupled the RV from the pulmonary vasculature by surgically banding the pulmonary artery and creating either severe or moderate RVPO. Severe RVPO led to early mortality, exuberant RV fibrosis and hypertrophy, which were all improved in Eng+/− mice or in WT mice treated with a neutralizing endoglin Ab.

To test the translational potential of targeting endoglin in RVF, we employed an N‐Eng Ab, which binds human and mouse endoglin with high avidity and is being studied in phase II clinical trials in oncology.5354 We now introduce data showing that this N‐Eng Ab blocks TGF‐β1 signaling in human RV fibroblasts and reversed fibrosis, type I collagen expression, and calcineurin levels within 3 weeks of initiating therapy in mice with established RVPO. Because the TGF‐β1‐signaling pathways affect various biologic processes in numerous tissues, the off‐target effects of blocking endoglin activity require further study. These findings may represent an important step toward novel drug development to improve RV function by targeting endoglin activity.

The present study has several limitations. First, we employed a mouse model with reduced total body expression of endoglin, as opposed to changes in cardiac‐restricted expression. Second, because of the fact that mortality was not increased with moderate PA constriction or treatment with Sugen+Hypoxia, we were technically unable to evaluate the effect of reducing endoglin activity on survival in these models. Third, future studies are required to examine the source of calcineurin expression in the RV and to target calcineurin and TRPC6 activity in models of RV injury.

In conclusion, RHF is a significant global health problem and a primary mode of death for millions of individuals suffering from HF or lung disease, yet therapies specifically targeting RV dysfunction do not exist. We have now identified a paradigm that implicates endoglin as a master regulator of TGF‐β1 signaling through canonical, noncanonical, and now calcineurin‐mediated pathways involving TRPC‐6 in the RV. These findings support that endoglin could potentially be a novel therapeutic target to limit RV fibrosis and improve survival in disease states characterized by RVPO. Further study is required to explore the translational potential of this paradigm involving endoglin‐dependent signaling in the RV.

Sources of Funding

This work was supported by a grant from the National Institutes of Health (K08HL094909‐03).

Disclosures

None.

References

  • 1.McLaughlin VV, Archer SL, Badesch DB, Barst RJ, Farber HW, Lindner JR, Mathier MA, McGoon MD, Park MH, Rosenson RS, Rubin LJ, Tapson VF, Varga J. ACCF/AHA 2009 expert consensus document on pulmonary hypertension a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents and the American Heart Association developed in collaboration with the American College of Chest Physicians; American Thoracic Society, Inc; and the Pulmonary Hypertension Association. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009; 53:1573-1619. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Haddad F, Peterson T, Fuh E, Kudelko KT, de Jesus Perez V, Skhiri M, Vagelos R, Schnittger I, Denault AY, Rosenthal DN, Doyle RL, Zamanian RT. Characteristics and outcome after hospitalization for acute right heart failure in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension. Circ Heart Fail. 2011; 4:692-699. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Rain S, Handoko ML, Trip P, Gan CT, Westerhof N, Stienen GJ, Paulus WJ, Ottenheijm CA, Marcus JT, Dorfmüller P, Guignabert C, Humbert M, Macdonald P, Dos Remedios C, Postmus PE, Saripalli C, Hidalgo CG, Granzier HL, Vonk‐Noordegraaf A, van der Velden J, de Man FS. Right ventricular diastolic impairment in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension. Circulation. 2013; 128:2016-2025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Benza RL, Miller DP, Gomberg‐Maitland M, Frantz RP, Foreman AJ, Coffey CS, Frost A, Barst RJ, Badesch DB, Elliott CG, Liou TG, McGoon MD. Predicting survival in pulmonary arterial hypertension: insights from the Registry to Evaluate Early and Long‐Term Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension Disease Management (REVEAL). Circulation. 2010; 122:164-172. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Bursi F, McNallan SM, Redfield MM, Nkomo VT, Lam CS, Weston SA, Jiang R, Roger VL. Pulmonary pressures and death in heart failure a community study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012; 59:222-231. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Kapur NK, Wilson S, Yunis AA, Qiao X, Mackey E, Paruchuri V, Baker C, Aronovitz MJ, Karumanchi SA, Letarte M, Kass DA, Mendelsohn ME, Karas RH. Reduced endoglin activity limits cardiac fibrosis and improves survival in heart failure. Circulation. 2012; 125:2728-2738. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Maring JA, Trojanowska M, ten Dijke P. Endoglin in fibrosis and scleroderma. Int Rev Cell Mol Biol. 2012; 297:10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Leask A. TGFbeta, cardiac fibroblasts, and the fibrotic response. Cardiovasc Res. 2007; 74:207-212. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Kuwahara F, Kai H, Tokuda K, Kai M, Takeshita A, Egashira K, Imaizumi T. Transforming growth factor‐beta function blocking prevents myocardial fibrosis and diastolic dysfunction in pressure‐overloaded rats. Circulation. 2002; 106:130-135. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Massague J. TGF‐beta signal transduction. Annu Rev Biochem. 1998; 67:753-791. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Hawinkels LJ, Kuiper P, Wiercinska E, Verspaget HW, Liu Z, Pardali E, Sier CF, ten Dijke P. Matrix metalloproteinase‐14 (MT1‐MMP)‐mediated endoglin shedding inhibits tumor angiogenesis. Cancer Res. 2010; 70:4141-4150. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Venkatesha S, Toporsian M, Lam C, Hanai J, Mammoto T, Kim YM, Bdolah Y, Lim KH, Yuan HT, Libermann TA, Stillman IE, Roberts D, D'Amore PA, Epstein FH, Sellke FW, Romero R, Sukhatme VP, Letarte M, Karumanchi SA. Soluble endoglin contributes to the pathogenesis of preeclampsia. Nat Med. 2006; 12:642-649. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Kapur NK, Heffernan KS, Yunis AA, Parpos P, Kiernan MS, Sahasrabudhe NA, Kimmelstiel CD, Kass DA, Karas RH, Mendelsohn ME. Usefulness of soluble endoglin as a noninvasive measure of left ventricular filling pressure in heart failure. Am J Cardiol. 2010; 106:1770-1776. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Malhotra R, Paskin‐Flerlage S, Zamanian RT, Zimmerman P, Schmidt JW, Deng DY, Southwood M, Spencer R, Lai CS, Parker W, Channick RN, Morrell NW, Elliott CG, Yu PB. Circulating angiogenic modulatory factors predict survival and functional class in pulmonary arterial hypertension. Pulm Circ. 2013; 3:369-380. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Li DY, Sorensen LK, Brooke BS, Urness LD, Davis EC, Taylor DG, Boak BB, Wendel DP. Defective angiogenesis in mice lacking endoglin. Science. 1999; 284:1534-1537. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Bourdeau A, Dumont DJ, Letarte M. A murine model of hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia. J Clin Invest. 1999; 104:1343-1351. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Wilkins BJ, Dai YS, Bueno OF, Parsons SA, Xu J, Plank DM, Jones F, Kimball TR, Molkentin JD. Calcineurin/NFAT coupling participates in pathological, but not physiological, cardiac hypertrophy. Circ Res. 2004; 94:110-118. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Heineke J, Molkentin JD. Regulation of cardiac hypertrophy by intracellular signalling pathways. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2006; 7:589-600. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Wilkins BJ, Molkentin JD. Calcium‐calcineurin signaling in the regulation of cardiac hypertrophy. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2004; 322:1178-1191. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Kuwahara K, Wang Y, McAnally J, Richardson JA, Bassel‐Duby R, Hill JA, Olson EN. TRPC6 fulfills a calcineurin signaling circuit during pathologic cardiac remodeling. J Clin Invest. 2006; 116:3114-3126. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Koitabashi N, Aiba T, Hesketh GG, Rowell J, Zhang M, Takimoto E, Tomaselli GF, Kass DA. Cyclic GMP/PKG‐dependent inhibition of TRPC6 channel activity and expression negatively regulates cardiomyocyte NFAT activation Novel mechanism of cardiac stress modulation by PDE5 inhibition. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2010; 48:713-724. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Patel A, Sharif‐Naeini R, Folgering JR, Bichet D, Duprat F, Honoré E. Canonical TRP channels and mechanotransduction: from physiology to disease states. Pflugers Arch. 2010; 460:571-581. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Wu X, Eder P, Chang B, Molkentin JD. TRPC channels are necessary mediators of pathologic cardiac hypertrophy. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2010; 107:7000-7005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Eder P, Molkentin JD. TRPC channels as effectors of cardiac hypertrophy. Circ Res. 2011; 108:265-272. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Thodeti CK, Paruchuri S, Meszaros JG. A TRP to cardiac fibroblast differentiation. Channels (Austin). 2013; 7:211-214. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Davis J, Burr AR, Davis GF, Birnbaumer L, Molkentin JD. A TRPC6‐dependent pathway for myofibroblast transdifferentiation and wound healing in vivo. Dev Cell. 2012; 23:705-715. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Kapur NK, Paruchuri V, Aronovitz MJ, Qiao X, Mackey EE, Daly GH, Ughreja K, Levine J, Blanton R, Hill NS, Karas RH. Biventricular remodeling in murine models of right ventricular pressure overload. PLoS One. 2013; 8:e70802. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Ciuclan L, Bonneau O, Hussey M, Duggan N, Holmes AM, Good R, Stringer R, Jones P, Morrell NW, Jarai G, Walker C, Westwick J, Thomas M. A novel murine model of severe pulmonary arterial hypertension. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2011; 184:1171-1182. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Urashima T, Zhao M, Wagner R, Fajardo G, Farahani S, Quertermous T, Bernstein D. Molecular and physiological characterization of RV remodeling in a murine model of pulmonary stenosis. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2008; 295:H1351-H1368. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.She X, Matsuno F, Harada N, Tsai H, Seon BK. Synergy between anti‐endoglin (CD105) monoclonal antibodies and TGF‐beta in suppression of growth of human endothelial cells. Int J Cancer. 2004; 108:251-257. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Rockman HA, Ono S, Ross RS, Jones LR, Karimi M. Molecular and physiological alterations in murine ventricular dysfunction. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1994; 91:2694-2698. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Kass DA, Yamazaki T, Burkhoff D, Maughan WL, Sagawa K. Determination of left ventricular end‐systolic pressure‐volume relationships by the conductance (volume) catheter technique. Circulation. 1986; 73:586-595. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Georgescu SP, Aronovitz MJ, Iovanna JL, Patten RD, Kyriakis JM, Goruppi S. Decreased metalloprotease 9 induction, cardiac fibrosis and higher autophagy after pressure overload in mice lacking the transcriptional regulator p8. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2011; 301:C1046-C1056. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Patten RD, Pourati I, Aronovitz MJ, Alsheikh‐Ali A, Eder S, Force T, Mendelsohn ME, Karas RH. 17 Beta‐estradiol differentially affects left ventricular and cardiomyocyte hypertrophy following myocardial infarction and pressure overload. J Card Fail. 2008; 14:245-253. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Kapur NK, Deming CB, Kapur S, Bian C, Champion HC, Donahue JK, Kass DA, Rade JJ. Hemodynamic modulation of endocardial thromboresistance. Circulation. 2007; 115:67-75. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Neuss M, Regitz‐Zagrosek V, Hildebrandt A, Fleck E. Isolation and characterisation of human cardiac fibroblasts from explanted adult hearts. Cell Tissue Res. 1996; 286:145-153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.White M, Montezano AC, Touyz RM. Angiotensin II signalling and calcineurin in cardiac fibroblasts: differential effects of calcineurin inhibitors FK506 and cyclosporine A. Ther Adv Cardiovasc Dis. 2012; 6:5-14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Zaffran S, Kelly RG, Meilhac SM, Buckingham ME, Brown NA. Right ventricular myocardium derives from the anterior heart field. Circ Res. 2004; 95:261-268. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Ricci M, Mohapatra B, Urbiztondo A, Birusingh RJ, Morgado M, Rodriguez MM, Lincoln J, Vatta M. Differential changes in TGF‐β/BMP signaling pathway in the right ventricular myocardium of newborns with hypoplastic left heart syndrome. J Card Fail. 2010; 16:628-634. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Bristow MR, Zisman LS, Lowes BD, Abraham WT, Badesch DB. The pressure‐overloaded right ventricle in pulmonary hypertension. Chest. 1998; 114:101S-106S. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Haddad F, Hunt SA, Rosenthal DN, Murphy DJ. Right ventricular function in cardiovascular disease. I. Anatomy, physiology, aging, and functional assessment of the right ventricle. Circulation. 2008; 117:1436-1448. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Dell'Italia LJ, Starling MR, Crawford MH, Boros BL, Chaudhuri TK. Right ventricular infarction: identification by hemodynamic measurements before and after volume loading and correlation with noninvasive techniques. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1984; 4:931-939. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Drake JI, Bogaard HJ, Mizuno S, Clifton B, Xie B, Gao Y, Dumur CI, Fawcett P, Voelkel NF, Natarajan R. Molecular signature of a right heart failure program in chronic severe pulmonary hypertension. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2011; 45:1239-1247. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Bogaard HJ, Natarajan R, Henderson SC, Long CS, Kraskauskas D, Smithson L, Ockaili R, McCord JM, Voelkel NF. Chronic pulmonary artery pressure elevation is insufficient to explain right heart failure. Circulation. 2009; 120:1951-1960. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Rowell J, Koitabashi N, Kass DA. TRP‐ing up heart and vessels: canonical transient receptor potential channels and cardiovascular disease. J Cardiovasc Transl Res. 2010; 3:516-524. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Yue L, Xie J, Nattel S. Molecular determinants of cardiac fibroblast electrical function and therapeutic implications for atrial fibrillation. Cardiovasc Res. 2011; 89:744-753. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Berry JM, Le V, Rotter D, Battiprolu PK, Grinsfelder B, Tannous P, Burchfield JS, Czubryt M, Backs J, Olson EN, Rothermel BA, Hill JA. Reversibility of adverse, calcineurin‐dependent cardiac remodeling. Circ Res. 2011; 109:407-417. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Tewari SG, Bugenhagen SM, Wang Z, Schreier DA, Carlson BE, Chesler NC, Beard DA. Analysis of cardiovascular dynamics in pulmonary hypertensive C57BL6/J mice. Front Physiol. 2013; 4:355. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Kögler H, Hartmann O, Leineweber K, van Nguyen P, Schott P, Brodde OE, Hasenfuss G. Mechanical load‐dependent regulation of gene expression in monocrotaline‐induced right ventricular hypertrophy in the rat. Circ Res. 2003; 93:230-237. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Hemnes AR, Zaiman A, Champion HC. PDE5A inhibition attenuates bleomycin‐induced pulmonary fibrosis and pulmonary hypertension through inhibition of ROS generation and RhoA/Rho kinase activation. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2008; 294:L24-L33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Saggar R, Khanna D, Vaidya A, Derhovanessian A, Maranian P, Duffy E, Belperio JA, Weigt SS, Dua S, Shapiro SS, Goldin JG, Abtin F, Lynch JP, III, Ross DJ, Forfia PR, Saggar R. Changes in right heart haemodynamics and echocardiographic function in an advanced phenotype of pulmonary hypertension and right heart dysfunction associated with pulmonary fibrosis. Thorax. 2014; 69:123-129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Vitarelli A, Barillà F, Capotosto L, D'Angeli I, Truscelli G, De Maio M, Ashurov R. Right ventricular function in acute pulmonary embolism: a combined assessment by three‐dimensional and speckle‐tracking echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2013; 13:S0894-S00897. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Rosen LS, Hurwitz HI, Wong MK, Goldman J, Mendelson DS, Figg WD, Spencer S, Adams BJ, Alvarez D, Seon BK, Theuer CP, Leigh BR, Gordon MS. A phase I first‐in‐human study of TRC105 (Anti‐Endoglin Antibody) in patients with advanced cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2012; 18:4820-4829. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Seon BK, Haba A, Matsuno F, Takahashi N, Tsujie M, She X, Harada N, Uneda S, Tsujie T, Toi H, Tsai H, Haruta Y. Endoglin‐targeted cancer therapy. Curr Drug Deliv. 2011; 8:135-143. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES