Open mesh versus laparoscopic mesh repair of inguinal hernia
- PMID: 15107485
- DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa040093
Open mesh versus laparoscopic mesh repair of inguinal hernia
Abstract
Background: Repair of inguinal hernias in men is a common surgical procedure, but the most effective surgical technique is unknown.
Methods: We randomly assigned men with inguinal hernias at 14 Veterans Affairs (VA) medical centers to either open mesh or laparoscopic mesh repair. The primary outcome was recurrence of hernias at two years. Secondary outcomes included complications and patient-centered outcomes.
Results: Of the 2164 patients who were randomly assigned to one of the two procedures, 1983 underwent an operation; two-year follow-up was completed in 1696 (85.5 percent). Recurrences were more common in the laparoscopic group (87 of 862 patients [10.1 percent]) than in the open group (41 of 834 patients [4.9 percent]; odds ratio, 2.2; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.5 to 3.2). The rate of complications was higher in the laparoscopic-surgery group than in the open-surgery group (39.0 percent vs. 33.4 percent; adjusted odds ratio, 1.3; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.1 to 1.6). The laparoscopic-surgery group had less pain initially than the open-surgery group on the day of surgery (difference in mean score on a visual-analogue scale, 10.2 mm; 95 percent confidence interval, 4.8 to 15.6) and at two weeks (6.1 mm; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.7 to 10.5) and returned to normal activities one day earlier (adjusted hazard ratio for a shorter time to return to normal activities, 1.2; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.1 to 1.3). In prespecified analyses, there was a significant interaction between the surgical approach (open or laparoscopic) and the type of hernia (primary or recurrent) (P=0.012). Recurrence was significantly more common after laparoscopic repair than after open repair of primary hernias (10.1 percent vs. 4.0 percent), but rates of recurrence after repair of recurrent hernias were similar in the two groups (10.0 percent and 14.1 percent, respectively).
Conclusions: The open technique is superior to the laparoscopic technique for mesh repair of primary hernias.
Copyright 2004 Massachusetts Medical Society
Comment in
-
Mesh repair of inguinal hernias--redux.N Engl J Med. 2004 Apr 29;350(18):1895-7. doi: 10.1056/NEJMe048062. Epub 2004 Apr 25. N Engl J Med. 2004. PMID: 15107484 No abstract available.
-
Open hernia repair better than laparoscopic.J Fam Pract. 2004 Aug;53(8):608, 610. J Fam Pract. 2004. PMID: 15298828 No abstract available.
-
Open mesh versus laparoscopic mesh hernia repair.N Engl J Med. 2004 Sep 30;351(14):1463-5; author reply 1463-5. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200409303511422. N Engl J Med. 2004. PMID: 15459313 No abstract available.
-
Open mesh versus laparoscopic mesh hernia repair.N Engl J Med. 2004 Sep 30;351(14):1463-5; author reply 1463-5. N Engl J Med. 2004. PMID: 15460000 No abstract available.
-
Open mesh versus laparoscopic mesh hernia repair.N Engl J Med. 2004 Sep 30;351(14):1463-5; author reply 1463-5. N Engl J Med. 2004. PMID: 15460001 No abstract available.
-
Individual Study Particularities Need to Be Considered.Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2016 Aug 8;113(31-32):543. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2016.0543a. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2016. PMID: 27581512 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
In Reply.Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2016 Aug 8;113(31-32):544. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2016.0544. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2016. PMID: 27581514 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Open Repair of Primary Versus Recurrent Male Unilateral Inguinal Hernias: Perioperative Complications and 1-Year Follow-up.World J Surg. 2016 Apr;40(4):813-25. doi: 10.1007/s00268-015-3325-9. World J Surg. 2016. PMID: 26581369 Free PMC article.
-
A randomized prospective controlled trial of laparoscopic extraperitoneal hernia repair and mesh-plug hernioplasty: a study of 315 cases.J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 1998 Dec;8(6):367-72. doi: 10.1089/lap.1998.8.367. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 1998. PMID: 9916589 Clinical Trial.
-
[Total endoscopic pre-peritoneal mesh implant in primary or recurrent inguinal hernias].Chirurg. 2001 Dec;72(12):1485-91. Chirurg. 2001. PMID: 11824036 German.
-
Perioperative outcomes and complications of open vs laparoscopic extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair in a mature surgical practice.Surg Endosc. 2004 Feb;18(2):221-7. doi: 10.1007/s00464-003-8934-y. Epub 2003 Nov 21. Surg Endosc. 2004. PMID: 14625733 Review.
-
Totally extraperitoneal laparoscopic hernioplasty versus open extraperitoneal approach for inguinal hernia repair: a meta-analysis of outcomes of our current knowledge.Surgeon. 2014 Apr;12(2):94-105. doi: 10.1016/j.surge.2013.11.018. Epub 2013 Dec 8. Surgeon. 2014. PMID: 24321839 Review.
Cited by
-
Laparoscopic bilateral inguinal hernia repair: Should it be the preferred technique?World J Methodol. 2022 Jul 20;12(4):193-199. doi: 10.5662/wjm.v12.i4.193. eCollection 2022 Jul 20. World J Methodol. 2022. PMID: 36159094 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The ONSTEP inguinal hernia repair technique: initial clinical experience of 693 patients, in two institutions.Hernia. 2013 Jun;17(3):357-64. doi: 10.1007/s10029-013-1057-z. Epub 2013 Feb 24. Hernia. 2013. PMID: 23435639
-
Internal hernia after trans-abdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) hernia repair: A case report.Int J Surg Case Rep. 2024 Nov;124:110445. doi: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2024.110445. Epub 2024 Oct 16. Int J Surg Case Rep. 2024. PMID: 39418992 Free PMC article.
-
[Management of recurrent inguinal hernia after previous mesh repair: a challenge].Chirurg. 2006 Jun;77(6):523-30. doi: 10.1007/s00104-006-1158-7. Chirurg. 2006. PMID: 16514540 German.
-
Laparoscopic surgery--15 years after clinical introduction.World J Surg. 2006 Jul;30(7):1190-203. doi: 10.1007/s00268-005-0644-2. World J Surg. 2006. PMID: 16816898 No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical