Abstract
In research on grammatical gender, assignment and agreement are the two central notions. Genders are defined as systems of agreement classes, and the assignment of nouns to genders is reflected in the agreement they consistently trigger on associated elements. Yet, gender assignment and gender agreement are often discussed quite separately. This paper investigates the possibility that gender agreement is not only an overt manifestation of gender assignment, but that properties of agreement systems can themselves constrain the assignment systems they express. The paper discusses typological and diachronic evidence for the fact that not every type of assignment system can be expressed in every type of agreement system.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Arndt W.W. (1970) Nonrandom assignment of loanwords: German noun gender. Word 26: 244–253
Asher R.E., Kumari T.C. (1997) Malayalam. Routledge, London
Audring J. (2006) Pronominal gender in spoken Dutch. Journal of Germanic Linguistics 18(2): 85–116
Audring, J. (forthcoming). Reinventing pronoun gender. Dissertation VU University Amsterdam.
Austin P. (1981) A grammar of Diyari, South Australia. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Baerman M., Brown D., Corbett G.G. (2005) The syntax-morphology-interface: A study of syncretism. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Barlow, M. (1991). The agreement hierarchy and grammatical theory. In Sutton, L. A., Johnson, C., & R. Shields (Eds.), Proceedings of the seventeenth annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistic Society (pp. 30–40). Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistic Society.
Barlow M. (1992) A situated theory of agreement. Garland Publishing, Inc, New York, London
Blake B.J. (1979) Pitta Pitta. In: Dixon R.M.W., Blake B.J. (eds) Handbook of Australian languages Vol. 1. John Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp 183–242
Carlson R. (1993) A sketch of Jo: A Mande language with a feminine pronoun. Mandenkan 25: 1–109
Carstensen B. (1980) The gender of English Loan-Words in German. Studia Anglica Poznaniensa 12: 3–25
Claudi U. (1985) Zur Entstehung von Genussystemen. Helmut Buske Verlag, Hamburg
Clyne M.G. (1969) Inhalt, Klangassoziation und Genus in der deutschen Sprache bei Ein- und Zweisprachigen. Zeitschrift für Phonetik, Sprachwissenschaft und Kommunikation 22: 218–224
Corbett G.G. (1979) The agreement hierarchy. Journal of Linguistics 15: 203–224
Corbett G.G. (1991) Gender. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Corbett, G. G. (2001). Agreement: Terms and boundaries “(The role of agreement in natural language”—Proceedings of the 2001 Texas Linguistic Society conference, Austin, Texas, 2–4 March 2001). Texas. Available under http://uts.cc.utexas.edu/~tls/2001tls/2001proceeds.html
Corbett G.G. (2005) The canonical approach in typology. In: Frajzyngier Z., Hodges A., Rood D.S. (eds) Linguistic diversity and language theories. John Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp 25–49
Corbett G.G. (2006) Agreement. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Corbett G.G. (2007) Canonical typology, suppletion and possible words. Language 83: 8–42
Croft W. (2001) Radical construction grammar. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Curzan A. (2003) Gender Shifts in the History of English. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Davidson H. (1990) Han hon den. Lund University Press, Lund
Dekeyser X. (1980) The diachrony of the gender systems in English and Dutch. In: Fisiak J. (eds) Historical morphology. Mouton, The Hague, pp 97–111
DeLancey S. (2003) Classical Tibetan. In: Thurgood G., LaPolla R.J. (eds) The Sino-Tibetan Languages. Routledge, London, pp 255–269
DeLancey S. (2003) Lhasa Tibetan. In: Thurgood G., LaPolla R.J. (eds) The Sino-Tibetan Languages. Routledge, London, pp 270–288
Derbyshire D.C., Payne D.L. (1990) Noun classification systems of Amazonian languages. In: Payne D.L. (eds) Amazonian Linguistics. Studies in Lowland South American Languages. University of Texas Press, Austin, pp 243–271
Derbyshire D.C. (1979) Hixkaryana. North Holland Publishing, Amsterdam
Dickens, P. J. (2005). In R. Vossen & Megan Biesele (Eds.) A concise grammar of Ju’hoan. Cologne: Köppe.
Dixon R.M.W. (1972) The Dyirbal language of North Queensland. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Donaldson B.C. (1993) A grammar of Afrikaans. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin
Donaldson B.C. (2000) Colloquial Afrikaans. Routledge, London
Enger, H.-O. (2006). Semantic assignment rules, especially the “crazy” ones. In Amsterdam gender colloquium. Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Everett D.L. (1986) Pirahã. In: Derbyshire D.C., Pullum G. (eds) Handbook of Amazonian languages Vol. I. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin, pp 200–325
Feldman, H. (1986). A grammar of Awtuw. Canberra: Department of Linguistics, Research School of Pacific Studies, the Australian National University.
Gregor B. (1983) Genuszuordnung. Tübingen, Niemeyer
Güldemann T. (2000) Noun categorization in the Non-Khoe lineages of Khoisan. Afrikanische Arbeitspapiere Köln 63: 5–33
Haspelmath M. (1997) Indefinite pronouns. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Haspelmath M. (2004) Coordinating constructions: An overview. In: Haspelmath M. (eds) Coordinating constructions. Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp 3–39
Haspelmath, M., Dryer, M.S., Gil, D., Comrie, B. (eds) (2008) WALS online. Max Planck Digital Library, Munich
Heringer, H.-J. (1995). Prinzipien der Genuszuweisung. In H. Popp (Ed.), Deutsch als Fremdsprache. An den Quellen eines Faches. Festschrift für Gerhard Helbig zum 65. Geburtstag (pp. 203–216). München: Iudicum.
Holmes P., Hinchcliffe I. (2003) Swedish: A comprehensive grammar. Routledge, London
Köpcke K.-M. (1982) Untersuchungen zum Genussystem der deutschen Gegenwartssprache. Tübingen, Niemeyer
Köpcke K.-M., Zubin D. (1984) Sechs Prinzipien für die Genuszuweisung im Deutschen: Ein Beitrag zur natürlichen Klassifikation. Linguistische Berichte 93: 26–51
Jenewari C.E.W. (1983) Defaka, Ijo’s closest linguistic relative. In: Dihoff I.R. (eds) Current approaches to African linguistics. Foris, Dordrecht, pp 85–111
Jensen C. (1999) Tupí-Guaraní.”. In: Dixon R.M.W., Aikhenvald A.Y. (eds) The Amazonian languages. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 125–63
Lang A. (1976) The semantic base of gender in German. Lingua 40: 55–68
Levine, G. S. (1999). Gender assignment to German nonsense nouns: What does the native speaker know that the non-native speaker doesn’t? In A. Greenhill (Ed.), Proceedings from BUCLD 23 (pp. 397– 406). Boston: Cascadilla.
Macaulay M. (1996) A grammar of Chalcatongo Mixtec. University of California Press, Berkeley
Mace J. (2003) Persian grammar. Routledge, London
Marchese L. (1988) Noun classes and agreement systems in Kru: A historical approach. In: Barlow M., Ferguson C.A. (eds) Agreement in natural languages:Approaches, theory, descriptions. CSLI, Stanford, CA, pp 323–341
McLendon S. (1975) A grammar of eastern Pomo. University of California Press, Berkeley
Mithun M. (1990) Third-person reference and the function of pronouns in Central Pomo natural speech. International Journal of American Linguistics 56(3): 361–376
Moore S. (1921) Grammatical and natural gender in Middle English. PMLA 36: 79–103
Moshinsky, J. (1974). A grammar of southeastern Pomo. Berkeley: University of California Publications.
Payne J.R. (1989) Pamir languages. In: Schmitt R. (eds) Compendium Linguarum Iranicarum. Reichert, Wiesbaden, pp 417–444
Phillips J.D. (2004) Manx. München, Lincom Europa
Ponelis F. (1979) Afrikaanse sintaksis. van Schaik, Pretoria
Premsrirat S. (1987) Khmu, a minority language of Thailand. Australian National University, Canberra
Priestly T.M.S. (1983) On ‘Drift’ in Indo-European gender systems. Journal of Indo-European Studies 11(3–4): 339–363
Quirk R., Greenbaum S., Leech G., Svartvik J. (1985) A comprehensive grammar of the English language. Longman, London
Rickard, D. T. (1970). Kru grammar: A preliminary study. Monrovia: Department of Literacy Work and Literature Production of the United Methodist Church.
Salmons J. (1993) The structure of the Lexicon: Evidence from German gender assignment. Studies in Language 17(2): 411–435
Salmons J. (1994) Sketch of an interlanguage rule system: Advances non-native German gender assignment. In: Blackshire-Belay C. (eds) Current issues in second language acquisition. University Press of America, Lanham, NY, London, pp 187–201
Sasse H.-J. (1993) Syntactic categories and subcategories. In: Jacobs J., Stechow A., Sternefeld W., Vennemann T. (eds) Syntax. Ein internationales Handbuch zeitgenössischer Forschung/An International Handbook of Contemporary Research Vol. 1. de Gruyter, Berlin, pp 646–686
Schlick W. (1984) Die Kriterien für die deutsche Genuszuweisung bei substantivischen Anglizismen. German Quarterly 57(3): 402–431
Siemund P. (2008) Pronominal gender in English—A study of English varieties from a cross-linguistic perspective. Routledge, London
Siewierska A. (2004) Person. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Tucker G.R., Lambert W.E., Rigault A.A. (1977) The French speaker’s skill with grammatical gender: An example of rule-governed behavior. Den Haag, Mouton
Wiesemann U. (1986) Pronominal systems. Tübingen, Narr
Williamson K. (1965) A grammar of the Kolokuma dialect of Ijo. Cambridge. University Press, Cambridge
Williamson K., Blench R. (2000) Niger-Congo. In: Heine B., Nurse D. (eds) African languages: An introduction. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 11–42
Zaliznjak, A. A. (1973). O ponimanii termina ‘padež’ v lingvističeskix opisanijax. In A. A. Zaliznjak (Ed.), Problemy grammatičeskogo modelirovanija (pp. 53–87). Moscow: Nauka. (Reprinted in. Russkoe imennoe slovoizmenenie: s priloženiem izbrannyx rabot po sovremennomu russkomu jazyku i obščemu jazykoznaiju (pp. 613–647) A. A. Zaliznjak, 2002, Moscow: Jazyki slavjanskoj kultury.
Acknowledgements
Many thanks to Geert Booij, Gunther de Vogelaer and two anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments.
Open Access
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Open Access This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
About this article
Cite this article
Audring, J. Gender assignment and gender agreement: Evidence from pronominal gender languages. Morphology 18, 93–116 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11525-009-9124-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11525-009-9124-y