Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Patent Cliffs in the Era of Complex Therapies and Biologics

  • Original Research Article
  • Published:
Pharmaceutical Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

The rise of new product classes such as biologics and complex molecules over the past two decades have brought to light some of the unique market dynamics that such products face. While we have seen and experienced the inception, growth and expansion phase of such products, the ongoing incumbent decline due to loss of exclusivity (LoE) is yet to be fully experienced. This raises the question of how one may go about modelling such a scenario given that forecasting the expected erosion curves accurately can ensure full brand value is retained for pharmaceutical companies.

Objectives

This research looks to analyze the ‘patent cliff’ across varying product classes and, in doing so, understand the drivers behind the different market dynamics post-LoE for traditional molecules, complex molecules and biologics.

Methods

An extensive list of molecules across various therapeutic areas succumbing to loss of patent exclusivity between 2014 and 2019 were categorized according to product class, and sales data were analyzed to reveal trends across different product classes.

Results

The analysis of sales behavior of these compounds revealed distinct tendencies in terms of sales erosion across the various product classes. The largest determinant for the behaviour of a prescription drug post-LoE is the degree of generic competition, which in turn is primarily influenced by the barriers to entry. This research details some of the key challenges relating to regulatory, legal and manufacturing aspects that distinguish biologics and complex molecules from traditional small molecules and ultimately lead to different market dynamics post-LoE.

Conclusions

Unlike for traditional small-molecule generics where originator manufacturers have limited options to fend off generics, the greater degree of ‘brand–brand’ competitive dynamics seen in the biologics and complex generics space allows manufacturers of originators to protect market share. This analysis represents a meaningful addition to understanding LoE across various class types and thus highlights the importance of strategic decision making that pharmaceutical companies need to take at LoE.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+
from €39.99 /Month
  • Starting from 10 chapters or articles per month
  • Access and download chapters and articles from more than 300k books and 2,500 journals
  • Cancel anytime
View plans

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.

References

  1. Harrison C. The patent cliff steepens. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2011;10:12–3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Song CH, Han JW. Patent cliff and strategic switch: exploring strategic design possibilities in the pharmaceutical industry. SpringerPlus. 2016;5:692.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Dave CV, Hartzema A, Kesselheim AS. Prices of generic drugs associated with numbers of manufacturers. New Engl J Med. 2017;377:2597–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. The identity problem. Nat Biotechnol. 2010;28:877.

  5. Price WN, Rai AK. Are trade secrets delaying biosimilars? Science. 2015;348:188–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Blackstone EA, Fuhr JP. The economics of biosimilars. Am Health Drug Benefits. 2013;6:469–77.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Smeeding J, Malone DC, Ramchandani M, et al. Biosimilars: considerations for payers. P and T. 2019;44:54–63.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Royzman I, Shah K. 10 years of biosimilars: lessons and trends. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41573-020-00081-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Pharma—GlobalData Intelligence Center—Pharma. https://www.pharma.globaldata.com/HomePage. Accessed Feb 2020.

  10. Zarxio (filgrastim-sndz). https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/nda/2015/125553Orig1s000TOC.cfm. Accessed Feb 2020.

  11. Awad M, Singh P, Hilas O. Zarxio (Filgrastim-sndz): the first biosimilar approved by the FDA. P and T. 2017;42:19–23.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Biosimilars of pegfilgrastim/General/Biosimilars/Home-GaBI Online-Generics and Biosimilars Initiative. https://www.gabionline.net/Biosimilars/General/Biosimilars-of-pegfilgrastim%2520. Accessed Feb 2020.

  13. GaBI Journal Editor. Patent expiry dates for biologicals: 2018 update. Gener Biosimilars Initiative J. 2019;8:24–31.

  14. Implementation of the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act of 2009|FDA. https://www.fda.gov/drugs/guidance-compliance-regulatory-information/implementation-biologics-price-competition-and-innovation-act-2009. Accessed Feb 2020.

  15. Prescribing Biosimilar and Interchangeable Products | FDA. https://www.fda.gov/drugs/biosimilars/prescribing-biosimilar-and-interchangeable-products. Accessed Feb 2020.

  16. Christl L, Lim S. Biosimilar and interchangeable products in the United States: scientific concepts, clinical use, and practical considerations. FDA. https://www.fda.gov/media/122832/download.

  17. Barbier L, Declerk P, Simoens S, et al. The arrival of biosimilar monoclonal antibodies in oncology: clinical studies for trastuzumab biosimilars. Br J Cancer. 2019;121:199–21010.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Questions and Answers on Biosimilar Development and the BPCI Act Guidance for Industry | FDA. https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/questions-and-answers-biosimilar-development-and-bpci-act-guidance-industry. Accessed Feb 2020.

  19. New and Revised Draft Q&As on Biosimilar Development and the BPCI Act (Revision 2)|FDA. https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/new-and-revised-draft-qas-biosimilar-development-and-bpci-act-revision-2. Accessed Feb 2020.

  20. In review: the life sciences regulatory regime in USA—Lexology. https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=4a803fd5-c107-4203-ae61-083ef4ce8bd6. Accessed Feb 2020.

  21. Socal MP, Anderson KE, Sen A, et al. Biosimilar uptake in medicare part B varied across hospital outpatient departments and physician practices: the case of filgrastim. Value in Health. 2020;23:481–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Estimating the budgetary impact of biosimilar coding policies under medicare part B. Biosimilars Forum. http://biosimilarsforum.org/sites/default/files/uploads/Reports/biosimilars_model_white_paper_updated_2017_2017.08.23.pdf

  23. Rose SA, Rice T. The biosimilar action plan: an effective mechanism for balancing biologic innovation and competition in the United States? SSRN Electron J. 2019. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3489444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Feldman R. May your drug price be evergreen. J Law Biosci. 2018;5:590–647.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Price WN, Rai AK. How logically impossible patents block biosimilars. Nat Biotechnol. 2019;37:862–3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Fda. HUMIRA® (adalimumab) injection, for subcutaneous use. https://www.fda.gov/medwatch. Accessed Feb 2020.

  27. AbbVie Announces HUMIRA® (adalimumab) Global Patent License with Pfizer | AbbVie News Center. https://www.news.abbvie.com/news/abbvie-announces-humira-adalimumab-global-patent-license-with-pfizer.htm. Accessed Feb 2020.

  28. AbbVie Announces HUMIRA® (adalimumab) Global Patent License with Momenta | AbbVie News Center. https://www.news.abbvie.com/news/press-releases/abbvie-announces-humira-adalimumab-global-patent-license-with-momenta.htm. Accessed Feb 2020.

  29. AbbVie Announces Global Resolution of HUMIRA® (adalimumab) Patent Disputes with Fresenius Kabi | AbbVie News Center. https://www.news.abbvie.com/news/abbvie-announces-global-resolution-humira-adalimumab-patent-disputes-with-fresenius-kabi.htm. Accessed Feb 2020.

  30. AbbVie Announces Global Resolution of HUMIRA® (adalimumab) Patent Disputes with Sandoz | AbbVie News Center. https://www.news.abbvie.com/news/abbvie-announces-global-resolution-humira-adalimumab-patent-disputes-with-sandoz.htm. Accessed Feb 2020.

  31. AbbVie Announces HUMIRA® (adalimumab) Patent License with Mylan | AbbVie News Center. https://www.news.abbvie.com/news/press-releases/abbvie-announces-humira-adalimumab-patent-license-with-mylan.htm. Accessed Feb 2020.

  32. AbbVie Announces Global Resolution of HUMIRA® (adalimumab) Patent Disputes with Samsung Bioepis | AbbVie News Center. https://www.news.abbvie.com/news/press-releases/abbvie-announces-global-resolution-humira-adalimumab-patent-disputes-with-samsung-bioepis.htm. Accessed Feb 2020.

  33. AbbVie Announces Global Resolution of HUMIRA® (adalimumab) Patent Disputes with Amgen | AbbVie News Center. https://www.news.abbvie.com/news/press-releases/abbvie-announces-global-resolution-humira-adalimumab-patent-disputes-with-amgen.htm. Accessed Feb 2020.

  34. Coherus BioSciences Announces Global Settlement with AbbVie Securing Rights to Commercialize its Adalimumab Biosimilar Candidate, CHS-1420 | Coherus BioSciences, Inc. https://www.investors.coherus.com/news-releases/news-release-details/coherus-biosciences-announces-global-settlement-abbvie-securing. Accessed Feb 2020.

  35. Coherus, Amgen Settle Biosimilar Adalimumab Lawsuit. https://www.centerforbiosimilars.com/news/coherus-amgen-settle-biosimilar-adalimumab-lawsuit. Accessed Feb 2020.

  36. FDA approves Ogivri as a biosimilar to Herceptin | FDA. https://www.fda.gov/drugs/resources-information-approved-drugs/fda-approves-ogivri-biosimilar-herceptin. Accessed Feb 2020.

  37. Herceptin Final Labeling Text HIGHLIGHTS OF PRESCRIBING INFORMATION. https://www.fda.gov/medwatch. Accessed Feb 2020.

  38. Analysis of the trastuzumab biosimilar market as herceptin exclusivity nears an end. https://www.biosimilardevelopment.com/doc/analysis-of-the-trastuzumab-biosimilar-market-as-herceptin-exclusivity-nears-an-end-0001. Accessed Feb 2020.

  39. de Cock E, Pivot X, Hauser N, et al. A time and motion study of subcutaneous versus intravenous trastuzumab in patients with HER2-positive early breast cancer. Cancer Med. 2016;5:389–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Gligorov J, Curigliano G, Muller V, et al. Switching between intravenous and subcutaneous trastuzumab: safety results from the PrefHer trial. Breast. 2017;34:89–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Pivot X, Verma S, Fallowfield L, et al. Efficacy and safety of subcutaneous trastuzumab and intravenous trastuzumab as part of adjuvant therapy for HER2-positive early breast cancer: final analysis of the randomised, two-cohort PrefHer study. Eur J Cancer. 2017;86:82–90.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Pfizer drops five preclinical biosimilar programmes / General / Biosimilars / Home - GaBI Online - Generics and Biosimilars Initiative. https://www.gabionline.net/Biosimilars/General/Pfizer-drops-five-preclinical-biosimilar-programmes. Accessed Feb 2020.

  43. Biogen Ups Investment in Biosimilar Drug Maker Samsung Bioepis by $700 Million | BioSpace. https://www.biospace.com/article/biogen-ups-investment-in-biosimilar-drug-maker-samsung-bioepis-by-700-million/. Accessed Feb 2020.

  44. Biosimilar Development, Review, and Approval | FDA. https://www.fda.gov/drugs/biosimilars/biosimilar-development-review-and-approval. Accessed Feb 2020.

  45. Biogen | Investor Relations. https://www.investors.biogen.com/. Accessed Feb 2020.

  46. Pfizer gets CRL on Epogen biosimilar from FDA - Pharmaceutical Business review. https://www.pharmaceutical-business-review.com/news/pfizer-gets-crl-on-epogen-biosimilar-from-fda-230617-5851688/. Accessed Feb 2020.

  47. Mylan and Biocon biosimilar of Amgen’s Neulasta hit with manufacturing-related CRL | FiercePharma. https://www.fiercepharma.com/manufacturing/mylan-and-biocon-biosimilar-amgen-s-neulasta-hit-crl. Accessed Feb 2020.

  48. Coherus BioSciences Receives Complete Response Letter from FDA for its Biologics License Application for CHS-1701 (Pegfilgrastim Biosimilar Candidate) | Coherus BioSciences, Inc. https://www.investors.coherus.com/news-releases/news-release-details/coherus-biosciences-receives-complete-response-letter-fda-its. Accessed Feb 2020.

  49. Biologics and Sterile Manufacturing 2019. https://www.biomanufacturing.org/uploads/files/114911539326785309-pharmaceutical-technology-ebook-biologics-manufacturing.pdf. Accessed Feb 2020.

  50. Choi SH, Wang Y, Conti DS, et al. Generic drug device combination products: regulatory and scientific considerations. Int J Pharm. 2018;544:443–54.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Zimmer D. Did the demand for crestor shrink when lipitor’s patent expired? J Ind Compet Trade. 2018;18:139–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Crestor tumbles off patent cliff as first generic copy approved in US | BioPharma Dive. https://www.biopharmadive.com/news/crestor-tumbles-off-patent-cliff-as-first-generic-copy-approved-in-us/418386/. Accessed Feb 2020.

  53. Drug Channels: How Teva Defended Copaxone From Generic Competition. https://www.drugchannels.net/2016/04/how-teva-defended-copaxone-from-generic.html. Accessed Feb 2020.

  54. RxData. https://www.rxdata.net/. Accessed Feb 2020.

Download references

Acknowledgements

MTS and MS thank Richard Ogborne for guidance in the ideation and development of the manuscript and Navigant Consulting (namely, Mark Chalmers, Nina Marinsek and Nick Georgitseas) for supporting its publication.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marco T. Sabatini.

Ethics declarations

Funding

The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Conflict of interest

MTS and MS have no conflicts of interest that are directly relevant to the content of this manuscript.

Ethics approval

Not applicable.

Consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Availability of data and material

Data are derived from public domain resources and available within the article or its supplementary materials.

Code availability

Not applicable.

Author contributions

MTS conceived the research and analyzed the data. MTS and MS wrote the manuscript.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (PDF 183 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sabatini, M.T., Silva, M. Patent Cliffs in the Era of Complex Therapies and Biologics. Pharm Med 34, 271–278 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40290-020-00348-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40290-020-00348-7