Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Quantitative changes in skin composition parameters due to chemotherapy in breast cancer patients: a cohort study

  • Epidemiology
  • Published:
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The objective of this study is to evaluate objective changes in water content, sebum content, transepidermal water loss (TEWL), and melanin due to breast cancer chemotherapy, and their association with subjective symptoms. Prospective cohort study of 61 patients 18 years of age or older with a postoperative diagnosis of stage I–III breast cancer, who received adjuvant chemotherapy between February and September 2012 at an outpatient breast cancer clinic in Korea. Objective skin parameters, measured using a noninvasive bioengineering device, and patient-reported dryness and dullness were assessed before chemotherapy, after two cycles of chemotherapy, and 1, 3, and 6 months after completion of chemotherapy. Water content (−6.5 %), sebum (−75.5 %), and TEWL (−22.4 %) significantly decreased during chemotherapy compared to pre-chemotherapy levels (all p values <0.001). These parameters were lowest at 1 month after completion of chemotherapy and recovered thereafter but did not return to baseline levels after 6 months of follow-up. Melanin increased during chemotherapy with respect to pre-chemotherapy levels (8.4 %; p < 0.001) but decreased from the first month after completion of chemotherapy through the end of follow-up (−17.1 %; p < 0.001). The patterns of skin changes were similar in patients with or without hormone therapy. Most of patients reported dryness (57.9 %) and dullness (49.1 %) after chemotherapy, and patient-reported dryness was significantly associated with decreased sebum content. Chemotherapy-induced substantial changes in objective skin composition parameters. These changes persisted after 6 months from completion of chemotherapy and were associated with patient-reported symptoms. Additional research is needed to translate these findings into interventions for improving the dermatologic quality of life of breast cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
€34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.

Abbreviations

T1:

Before chemotherapy

T2:

After two cycles of chemotherapy

T3:

1 Month after completion of chemotherapy

T4:

3 Months after completion of chemotherapy

T5:

6 Months after completion of chemotherapy

CG:

Received chemotherapy only group

CHG:

Received chemotherapy and hormone therapy

AC:

Doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide

FAC:

Cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, fluorouracil

T:

Docetaxel

TEWL:

Transepidermal water loss

References

  1. Stan D, Loprinzi CL, Ruddy KJ (2013) Breast cancer survivorship issues. Hematol/Oncol Clin N Am 27(4):805–827. doi:10.1016/j.hoc.2013.05.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Griggs JJ, Hawley ST, Graff JJ, Hamilton AS, Jagsi R, Janz NK, Mujahid MS, Friese CR, Salem B, Abrahamse PH, Katz SJ (2012) Factors associated with receipt of breast cancer adjuvant chemotherapy in a diverse population-based sample. J Clin Oncol 30(25):3058–3064

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Reich S, Trueb RM (2003) Trichoteiromania. J Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft 1(1):22–28 (J German Soc Dermatol JDDG)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Katoh M, Kadota M, Nishimura Y (2004) A case of docetaxel-induced erythrodysesthesia. J Dermatol 31(5):403–406

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Childress J, Lokich J (2003) Cutaneous hand and foot toxicity associated with cancer chemotherapy. Am J Clin Oncol 26(5):435–436. doi:10.1097/01.coc.0000026486.56886.18

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Karam A, Metges JP, Labat JP, Leroy JP, Guillet G (2002) Squamous syringometaplasia associated with docetaxel. Br J Dermatol 146(3):524–525

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Chen M, Crowson AN, Woofter M, Luca MB, Magro CM (2004) Docetaxel (taxotere) induced subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus: report of 4 cases. J Rheumatol 31(4):818–820

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ascherman JA, Knowles SL, Attkiss K (2000) Docetaxel (taxotere) extravasation: a report of five cases with treatment recommendations. Ann Plast Surg 45(4):438–441

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Eich D, Scharffetter-Kochanek K, Eich HT, Tantcheva-Poor I, Krieg T (2002) Acral erythrodysesthesia syndrome caused by intravenous infusion of docetaxel in breast cancer. Am J Clin Oncol 25(6):599–602

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Chu CY, Yang CH, Yang CY, Hsiao GH, Chiu HC (2000) Fixed erythrodysaesthesia plaque due to intravenous injection of docetaxel. Br J Dermatol 142(4):808–811

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Heidary N, Naik H, Burgin S (2008) Chemotherapeutic agents and the skin: an update. J Am Acad Dermatol 58(4):545–570. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2008.01.001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Gandhi M, Oishi K, Zubal B, Lacouture ME (2010) Unanticipated toxicities from anticancer therapies: survivors’ perspectives. Support Care Cancer 18(11):1461–1468. doi:10.1007/s00520-009-0769-1 (official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Haley AC, Calahan C, Gandhi M, West DP, Rademaker A, Lacouture ME (2011) Skin care management in cancer patients: an evaluation of quality of life and tolerability. Support Care Cancer 19(4):545–554. doi:10.1007/s00520-010-0851-8 (official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer)

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Richardson LC, Wang W, Hartzema AG, Wagner S (2007) The role of health-related quality of life in early discontinuation of chemotherapy for breast cancer. Breast J 13(6):581–587. doi:10.1111/j.1524-4741.2007.00512.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ra HS, Shin SJ, Kim JH, Lim H, Cho BC, Roh MR (2013) The impact of dermatological toxicities of anti-cancer therapy on the dermatological quality of life of cancer patients. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 27(1):e53–e59. doi:10.1111/j.1468-3083.2012.04466.x (JEADV)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Pierard GE, Pierard-Franchimont C, Marks R, Paye M, Rogiers V (2000) EEMCO guidance for the in vivo assessment of skin greasiness. The EEMCO Group. Skin Pharmacol Appl Skin Physiol 13(6):372–389

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Rogiers V (2001) EEMCO guidance for the assessment of transepidermal water loss in cosmetic sciences. Skin Pharmacol Appl Skin Physiol 14(2):117–128

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Hall G, Phillips TJ (2005) Estrogen and skin: the effects of estrogen, menopause, and hormone replacement therapy on the skin. J Am Acad Dermatol 53(4):555–568. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2004.08.039 (quiz 569–572)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Wines N, Willsteed E (2001) Menopause and the skin. Australas J Dermatol 42(3):148–149 (quiz 159)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Stewart ME, Downing DT (1991) Chemistry and function of mammalian sebaceous lipids. Adv Lipid Res 24:263–301

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Fluhr JW, Mao-Qiang M, Brown BE, Wertz PW, Crumrine D, Sundberg JP, Feingold KR, Elias PM (2003) Glycerol regulates stratum corneum hydration in sebaceous gland deficient (asebia) mice. J Invest Dermatol 120(5):728–737. doi:10.1046/j.1523-1747.2003.12134.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Thody AJ, Shuster S (1989) Control and function of sebaceous glands. Physiol Rev 69(2):383–416

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Selleri S, Seltmann H, Gariboldi S, Shirai YF, Balsari A, Zouboulis CC, Rumio C (2006) Doxorubicin-induced alopecia is associated with sebaceous gland degeneration. J Invest Dermatol 126(4):711–720. doi:10.1038/sj.jid.5700175

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Alley E, Green R, Schuchter L (2002) Cutaneous toxicities of cancer therapy. Curr Opin Oncol 14(2):212–216

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Imokawa G, Hattori M (1985) A possible function of structural lipids in the water-holding properties of the stratum corneum. J Invest Dermatol 84(4):282–284

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Perez-Soler R (2003) Can rash associated with HER1/EGFR inhibition be used as a marker of treatment outcome? Oncology 17(11 Suppl 12):23–28

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Fluhr JW, Miteva M, Primavera G, Ziemer M, Elsner P, Berardesca E (2007) Functional assessment of a skin care system in patients on chemotherapy. Skin Pharmacol Physiol 20(5):253–259. doi:10.1159/000104423

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Proksch E, Brandner JM, Jensen J-M (2008) The skin: an indispensable barrier. Exp Dermatol 17(12):1063–1072. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0625.2008.00786.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Kobayashi H, Tagami H (2004) Distinct locational differences observable in biophysical functions of the facial skin: with special emphasis on the poor functional properties of the stratum corneum of the perioral region. Int J Cosmet Sci 26(2):91–101. doi:10.1111/j.0412-5463.2004.00208.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Jensen JM, Forl M, Winoto-Morbach S, Seite S, Schunck M, Proksch E, Schutze S (2005) Acid and neutral sphingomyelinase, ceramide synthase, and acid ceramidase activities in cutaneous aging. Exp Dermatol 14(8):609–618. doi:10.1111/j.0906-6705.2005.00342.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Rawlings AV, Voegeli R (2013) Stratum corneum proteases and dry skin conditions. Cell Tissue Res 351(2):217–235. doi:10.1007/s00441-012-1501-x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Farage MA, Miller KW, Elsner P, Maibach HI (2013) Characteristics of the aging skin. Adv Wound Care 2(1):5–10. doi:10.1089/wound.2011.0356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Farinelli N, Berardesca E (1995) The skin integument: variation relative to sex, age, race, and body region. In: Serup J, Jemec GBE, Grove GL (eds) Handbook of non-invasive methods and the skin, 2nd edn. CRC, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  34. Hymes SR, Simonton SC, Farmer ER, Beschorner WB, Tutschka PJ, Santos GW (1985) Cutaneous busulfan effect in patients receiving bone-marrow transplantation. J Cutan Pathol 12(2):125–129

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Seiberg M (2013) Age-induced hair greying—the multiple effects of oxidative stress. Int J Cosmet Sci 35(6):532–538. doi:10.1111/ics.12090

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Chen N, Seiberg M, Lin CB (2006) Cathepsin L2 levels inversely correlate with skin color. J Invest Dermatol 126(10):2345–2347. doi:10.1038/sj.jid.5700409

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Thornton MJ (2013) Estrogens and aging skin. Dermato-Endocrinology 5(2):264–270. doi:10.4161/derm.23872

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Verdier-Sevrain S, Bonte F, Gilchrest B (2006) Biology of estrogens in skin: implications for skin aging. Exp Dermatol 15(2):83–94. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0625.2005.00377.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Surazynski A, Jarzabek K, Haczynski J, Laudanski P, Palka J, Wolczynski S (2003) Differential effects of estradiol and raloxifene on collagen biosynthesis in cultured human skin fibroblasts. Int J Mol Med 12(5):803–809

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Hardman MJ, Emmerson E, Campbell L, Ashcroft GS (2008) Selective estrogen receptor modulators accelerate cutaneous wound healing in ovariectomized female mice. Endocrinology 149(2):551–557. doi:10.1210/en.2007-1042

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Kim SW, Yoon HS (2009) Tamoxifen-induced melasma in a postmenopausal woman. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 23(10):1199–1200. doi:10.1111/j.1468-3083.2009.03113.x (JEADV)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the research was supported by AMOREPACIFIC and the Korea Breast Cancer Foundation, the Faculty Research Fund, Sungkyunkwan University (2013).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Juhee Cho.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Dong-Youn Lee and Juhee Cho contributed equally to this study.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Figure S1 (TIFF 58 kb)

Trajectories of water content (a), sebum content (b), transepidermal water loss (TEWL) (c), and melanin index (d) on the cheek according to the type of chemotherapy before, after two cycles of chemotherapy, and after completion of chemotherapy. AC doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (n = 16); FAC cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and fluorouracil (n = 16); AC + T doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, and docetaxel (n = 29). Hormone therapy was received by 87.5, 50, and 72.4% of those receiving AC, FAC, and AC + T, respectively Differences between the slopes in the three groups were not statistically significant. The chemotherapy regimen included doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, fluorouracil, and taxotere. T1 before chemotherapy, T2 after two cycles of chemotherapy, T3 1 month after completion of chemotherapy, T4 3 months after completion of chemotherapy, T5 6 months after completion of chemotherapy

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kang, D., Kim, IR., Im, Y.H. et al. Quantitative changes in skin composition parameters due to chemotherapy in breast cancer patients: a cohort study. Breast Cancer Res Treat 152, 675–682 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-015-3502-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-015-3502-4

Keywords