Skip to main content
Log in

Multidimensional Computerized Adaptive Testing of the EORTC QLQ-C30: Basic Developments and Evaluations

  • Published:
Quality of Life Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective: Self-report questionnaires are widely used to measure health-related quality of life (HRQOL). Ideally, such questionnaires should be adapted to the individual patient and at the same time scores should be directly comparable across patients. This may be achieved using computerized adaptive testing (CAT). Usually, CAT is carried out for a single domain at a time. However, many HRQOL domains are highly correlated. Multidimensional CAT may utilize these correlations to improve measurement efficiency. We investigated the possible advantages and difficulties of multidimensional CAT. Study design and setting: We evaluated multidimensional CAT of three scales from the EORTC QLQ-C30: the physical functioning, emotional functioning, and fatigue scales. Analyses utilised a database with 2958 European cancer patients.Results: It was possible to obtain scores for the three domains with five to seven items administered using multidimensional CAT that were very close to the scores obtained using all 12 items and with no or little loss of measurement precision.Conclusion: The findings suggest that multidimensional CAT may significantly improve measurement precision and efficiency and encourage further research into multidimensional CAT. Particularly, the estimation of the model underlying the multidimensional CAT and the conceptual aspects need further investigations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
€34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.

References

  1. H Wainer (2000) Computerized Adaptive testing: A Primer Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc. Mahwah, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  2. WJ Linden Particlevan der RK Hambleton (1997) Handbook of Modern Item Response Theory Springer Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  3. DO Segall (1996) ArticleTitleMultidimensional adaptive testing Psychometrika 61 IssueID2 331–354 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF02294343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. WJ Linden Particlevan der (1999) ArticleTitleMultidimensional adaptive testing with a minimum error-variance criterion J Educ Behav Stat 24 IssueID4 398–412

    Google Scholar 

  5. W Gardner KJ Kelleher KA Pajer (2002) ArticleTitleMultidimensional adaptive testing for mental health problems in primary care Med Care 40 IssueID9 812–823 Occurrence Handle10.1097/00005650-200209000-00010 Occurrence Handle12218771

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. WC Wang PH Chen YY Cheng (2004) ArticleTitleImproving measurement precision of test batteries using multidimensional item response models Psychol Methods 9 IssueID1 116–136 Occurrence Handle10.1037/1082-989X.9.1.116 Occurrence Handle15053722

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. WC Wang PH Chen (2004) ArticleTitleImplementation and measurement efficiency of multidimensional computerized adaptive testing Appl Psychol Meas 28 IssueID5 295–316

    Google Scholar 

  8. NK Aaronson S Ahmedzai B Bergman M Bullinger A Cull NJ Duez A Filiberti H Flechtner SB Fleishman JC Haes Particlede (1993) ArticleTitleThe European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology J Natl Cancer Inst 85 IssueID5 365–376 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByyC28vivVc%3D Occurrence Handle8433390

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. P Fayers A Bottomley (2002) ArticleTitleQuality of life research within the EORTC-the EORTC QLQ-C30. European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Eur J Cancer 38 IssueIDSuppl 4 S125–S133 Occurrence Handle11858978

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. A Garratt L Schmidt A Mackintosh R Fitzpatrick (2002) ArticleTitleQuality of life measurement: bibliographic study of patient assessed health outcome measures BMJ 324 IssueID7351 1417–1419 Occurrence Handle10.1136/bmj.324.7351.1417 Occurrence Handle12065262

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. LK Muthen BO Muthen (2001) Mplus User’s Guide Muthen & Muthen Los Angeles, CA

    Google Scholar 

  12. PM Fayers NK Aaronson K Bjordal M Groenvold D Curran A Bottomley (2001) The EORTC QLQ-C30 Scoring Manual European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  13. JB Bjorner MAa Petersen M Groenvold N Aaronson M Ahlner-Elmqvist JI Arraras P Fayers MS Jordhoy MA Sprangers T Young (2004) ArticleTitleUse of item response theory to develop a shortened version of the EORTC QLQ-C30 emotional function scale Qual Life Res 13 1683–1697 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s11136-004-7866-x Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD2M%2FisVyitg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle15651539

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. MAa Petersen M Groenvold JB Bjorner NK Aaronson T Conroy A Cull PM Fayers M Hjermstad MA Sprangers M Sullivan (2003) ArticleTitleUse of differential item functioning analysis to assess the equivalence of translations of a questionnaire Qual Life Res 12 IssueID4 373–385 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1023488915557 Occurrence Handle12797710

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Lord FM. A theory of test scores. Psychometric Monogr 1952; 7.

  16. RD Bock R Gibbons E Muraki (1988) ArticleTitleFull-information item factor analysis Appl Psychol Meas 12 IssueID3 261–280

    Google Scholar 

  17. Y Takane (1987) ArticleTitleOn the relationship between item response theory and factor analysis of discretized variables Psychometrika 52 IssueID3 393–408

    Google Scholar 

  18. RD Bock RJ Mislevy (1982) ArticleTitleAdaptive EAP estimation of ability in a microcomputer enviroment Appl Psychol Meas 6 IssueID4 431–444

    Google Scholar 

  19. H Wainer D Thissen (1987) ArticleTitleEstimating ability with the wrong model J Educ Stat 12 IssueID4 339–368

    Google Scholar 

  20. WH Press SA Teukolsky WT Vetterling BP Flannery (2002) Numerical Recipes in C++: The Art of Scientific Computing Cambridge University Press Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  21. AD Mead F Drasgow (1993) ArticleTitleEquivalence of computerized and paper-and pencil cognitive ability tests: A meta-analysis Psychol Bull 114 IssueID3 449–458 Occurrence Handle10.1037/0033-2909.114.3.449

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. PM Fayers D Machin (2000) Quality of Life. Assessment, Analysis and Interpretation John Wiley & Sons Ltd Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  23. DT Karnofsky WH Abelman LF Craver JH Burchenal (1948) ArticleTitleThe use of the nitrogen mustards in the palliative treatment of carcinoma – with particular reference to Bronchogenic Carcinoma Cancer 1 IssueID4 634–656

    Google Scholar 

  24. AS Zigmond RP Snaith (1983) ArticleTitleThe hospital anxiety and depression scale Acta Psychiatr Scand 67 IssueID6 361–370 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BiyB2sbhtVw%3D Occurrence Handle6880820

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. InstitutionalAuthorNameSAS Institute Inc (1999) SAS Procedures Guide, Version 8 SAS Institute Inc. Cary, NC, USA

    Google Scholar 

  26. D Osoba (2002) ArticleTitleA taxonomy of the uses of health-related quality-of-life instruments in cancer care and the clinical meaningfulness of the results Med Care 40 IssueID6 Suppl III31–III38 Occurrence Handle12064756

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Bartholomew D, Knott M. Latent Variable Models and Factor Analysis. Hodder & Stoughton, 1999.

  28. JB Bjorner M Kosinski JE Ware SuffixJr (2003) ArticleTitleThe feasibility of applying item response theory to measures of migraine impact: A re-analysis of three clinical studies Qual Life Res 12 IssueID8 887–902 Occurrence Handle14651410

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. DA Revicki DF Cella (1997) ArticleTitleHealth status assessment for the twenty-first century: item response theory, item banking and computer adaptive testing Qual Life Res 6 IssueID6 595–600 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1018420418455 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByiH2s7mtFM%3D Occurrence Handle9330558

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. JE Ware SuffixJr JB Bjorner M Kosinski (2000) ArticleTitlePractical implications of item response theory and computerized adaptive testing: a brief summary of ongoing studies of widely used headache impact scales Med Care 38 IssueID9 Suppl II73–II82 Occurrence Handle10982092

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. JE Ware SuffixJr M Kosinski JB Bjorner MS Bayliss A Batenhorst (2003) ArticleTitleApplications of computerized adaptive testing (CAT) to the assessment of headache impact Qual Life Res 12 IssueID8 935–952 Occurrence Handle14651413

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Morten Aa. Petersen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Petersen, M.A., Groenvold, M., Aaronson, N. et al. Multidimensional Computerized Adaptive Testing of the EORTC QLQ-C30: Basic Developments and Evaluations. Qual Life Res 15, 315–329 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-005-3214-z

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-005-3214-z

Keywords