Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

British Journal of Cancer
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • Log in
  • Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. british journal of cancer
  3. regular article
  4. article
Gemcitabine plus best supportive care (BSC) vs BSC in inoperable non-small cell lung cancer – a randomized trial with quality of life as the primary outcome
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Regular Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 25 July 2000

Gemcitabine plus best supportive care (BSC) vs BSC in inoperable non-small cell lung cancer – a randomized trial with quality of life as the primary outcome

  • H Anderson1,
  • P Hopwood2,
  • R J Stephens3,
  • N Thatcher4,
  • B Cottier5,
  • M Nicholson6,
  • R Milroy7,
  • T S Maughan8,
  • S J Falk9,
  • M G Bond10,
  • P A Burt11,
  • C K Connolly12,
  • M B McIllmurray13 &
  • J Carmichael14
  • on behalf of the UK NSCLC Gemcitabine Group

British Journal of Cancer volume 83, pages 447–453 (2000)Cite this article

  • 2851 Accesses

  • 302 Citations

  • 18 Altmetric

  • Metrics details

This article has been updated

Abstract

Three hundred patients with symptomatic, locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC not requiring immediate radiotherapy were enrolled into this randomized multicentre trial comparing gemcitabine + BSC vs BSC alone. Patients allocated gemcitabine received 1000 mg/m2on days 1, 8 and 15 of a 28-day cycle, for a maximum of six cycles. The main aim of this trial was to compare patient assessment of a predefined subset of commonly reported symptoms (SS14) from the EORTC QLQ-C30 and LC13 scales. The primary end-points were defined as (1) the percentage change in mean SS14 score between baseline and 2 months and (2) the proportion of patients with a marked (≥ 25%) improvement in SS14 score between baseline and 2 months sustained for ≥4 weeks. The secondary objectives were to compare treatments with respect to overall survival, and multidimensional QL parameters.The treatment groups were balanced with regard to age, gender, Karnofsky performance status (KPS) and disease stage (40% had metastatic disease). The percentage change in mean SS14 score from baseline to 2 months was a 10% decrease (i.e. improvement) for gemcitabine plus BSC and a 1% increase (i.e. deterioration) for BSC alone (P = 0.113, two-sample t -test). A sustained (≥ 4 weeks) improvement (≥25%) on SS14 was recorded in a significantly higher proportion of gemcitabine + BSC patients (22%) than in BSC alone patients (9%) (P = 0.0014, Pearson's chi-squared test). The QLQ-C30 and L13 subscales showed greater improvement in the gemcitabine plus BSC arm (in 11 domains) than in the BSC arm (one symptom item). There was greater deterioration in the BSC alone arm (six domains/items) than in the gemcitabine + BSC arm (three QL domains). Tumour response occurred in 19% (95% CI 13–27) of gemcitabine patients. There was no difference in overall survival: median 5.7 months (95% CI 4.6–7.6) for gemcitabine + BSC patients and 5.9 months (95% CI 5.0–7.9) (log-rank, P = 0.84) for BSC patients, and 1-year survival was 25% for gemcitabine + BSC and 22% for BSC. Overall, 74 (49%) gemcitabine + BSC patients and 119 (79%) BSC patients received palliative radiotherapy. The median time to radiotherapy was 29 weeks for gemcitabine + BSC patients and 3.8 weeks for BSC. Patients treated with gemcitabine + BSC reported better QL and reduced disease-related symptoms compared with those receiving BSC alone. These improvements in patient-assessed QL were significant in magnitude and were sustained. © 2000 Cancer Research Campaign

Similar content being viewed by others

Cost-effectiveness analysis of nimotuzumab combined with gemcitabine for K-Ras wild type locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer in China

Article Open access 21 February 2025

A phase I study of the CDK4/6 inhibitor ribociclib combined with gemcitabine in patients with advanced solid tumors

Article Open access 14 January 2025

Phase 1 study of the ATR inhibitor berzosertib (formerly M6620, VX-970) combined with gemcitabine ± cisplatin in patients with advanced solid tumours

Article Open access 26 May 2021

Article PDF

Change history

  • 16 November 2011

    This paper was modified 12 months after initial publication to switch to Creative Commons licence terms, as noted at publication

References

  • Aapro MS, Martin C and Hatty S (1998) Gemcitabine: a safety review. Anti-Cancer Drugs 9: 191–201

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Aaronson NK, Ahmedzai S, Bergman B, Bullinger M, Cull A, Duez NJ, Filiberti A, Flechtner H, Fleisham SB and deHaes JC (1993) The EORTC QLQ-C30: a quality of life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. J Natl Cancer Inst 85: 365–376

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barsevik A, Langer C, Brunet D, Grindel C, Leighton J and Luckscheider C (1997) Correlation of quality of life (QOL) with survival, treatment response, and anemia in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with carboplatin and paclitaxel [abstract]. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 16: 44a

    Google Scholar 

  • Batel-Copel M, Kornblith AB and Batel PC (1997) Do oncologists have an increasing interest in the quality of life of their patients? A literature review of the last 15 years. Eur J Cancer 33: 29–32

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bergman B, Aaronson NK, Ahmedzai S, Kaasa S and Sullivan M (1994) The EORTC QLQ-LC13: a modular supplement to the EORTC core quality of life questionnaire (QLQ-C30) for use in lung cancer clinical trials. Eur J Cancer 30A: 635–642

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bernhard J and Gelber RD (eds) (1998) Workshop on missing data in quality of life research in cancer clinical trials: practical and methodological issues. Stat Med 17: 5–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Billingham LJ, Cullen MH, Woods AD and Chetiyawardana RC (1997) Mitomycin, ifosfamide and cisplatin (MIC) in non-small cell lung cancer: 3. Results of a randomised trial evaluating palliation and quality of life [abstract]. Lung Cancer 18: 9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brinkley D (1985) Quality of life in cancer trials. BMJ 291: 685–686

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Cox JD, Stetz J and Pajak TF (1995) Toxicity criteria of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC). Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 31: 1341–1346

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cullen MH (1993) The MIC regimen in non-small cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer 9: 81–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elderly Lung Cancer Vinorelbine Italian Study Group (1999) Effects of vinorelbine on quality of life and survival of elderly patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 91: 66–72

  • Fernandez C and Rosell R (1989) Quality of life during chemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer patients. Acta Oncol 28: 29–33

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hardy JR, Noble T and Smith IE (1989) Symptom relief with moderate dose chemotherapy (mitomycin-C, vinblastine and cisplatin) in advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Br J Cancer 60: 764–766

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Harper PG, James LE, Spiro SG and Rudd RM (1997) Five day oral etoposide treatment for advanced small cell lung cancer (SCLC): quality of life (QOL) assessments in a randomised comparison with intravenous chemotherapy [abstract]. Lung Cancer 18 (Suppl 1): 204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hopwood P (1996) Quality of life assessment in chemotherapy trials for non-small cell lung cancer: are theory and practice significantly different?. Semin Oncol 23: 60–64

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hopwood P (1997) Evidence for the impact of quality of life. Lung Cancer 18: 66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hopwood P, Stephens RJ and Machin D for the MRC Lung Cancer Working Party (1994) Approaches to the analysis of quality of life data: experiences gained from a Medical Research Council Lung Cancer Working Party palliative chemotherapy trial. Qual Life Res 3: 339–352

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hopwood P and Stephens RJ on behalf of the Medical Research Council (MRC) Lung Cancer Working Party (1995) Symptoms at presentation for treatment in patients with lung cancer: implications for the evaluation of palliative treatment. Br J Cancer 7: 633–636

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hopwood P, Harvey A, Davies J, Stephens RJ, Girling DJ, Gibson D and Parmar MK (1998) Survey of the administration of quality of life (QL) questionnaires in three multicentre randomised trials in cancer. Eur J Cancer 34: 49–57

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • MRC LCWP (1996 a) Randomised trial of four-drug vs less intensive two-drug chemotherapy in the palliative treatment of patients with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) and poor prognosis. Br J Cancer 73: 406–413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MRC LCWP (1996 b) Randomised trial of palliative two-fraction versus more intensive 13-fraction radiotherapy for patients with inoperable non-small cell lung cancer and good performance status. Clin Oncol 8: 167–75

  • Noble S and Goa KL (1997) Gemcitabine: a review of its pharmacology and clinical potential in non-small cell lung cancer and pancreatic cancer. Drugs 54: 447–472

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Collaborative Group (1995) Chemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis using updated data on individual patients from 52 randomised clinical trials. BMJ 311: 899–909

  • Pocock S and Simon R (1975) Sequential treatment assignment with balancing of prognostic factors in controlled clinical trials. Biometrics 31: 103–115

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stephens RJ, Hopwood P, Girling DJ and Machin D (1997) Randomized trials with quality of life endpoints. Are doctors' ratings of patients' physical symptoms interchangeable with patients' self-ratings?. Qual Life Res 6: 225–236

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stephens RJ, Hopwood P and Girling D (1999) Defining and analysing symptom palliation in cancer clinical trials: a deceptively difficult exercise. Br J Cancer 79: 538–544

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart LA, Pignon JP, Parmar MKB, Le Chevalier T and Souhami RL on behalf of the NSCLC Collaborators Group (1994) A meta-analysis using individual patient data from randomised clinical trials (RCTs) of chemotherapy (CT) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): (3) Survival in the supportive care setting [abstract]. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 13: 337

    Google Scholar 

  • Thatcher N, Anderson H, Betticher DC and Ranson M (1995) Symptomatic benefit from gemcitabine and other chemotherapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: changes in performance status and tumour-related symptoms. Anti-Cancer Drugs 6: 39–48

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thatcher N, Hopwood P and Anderson H (1997) Improving quality of life in patients with non-small cell lung cancer: research experience with gemcitabine. Eur J Cancer 33: S8–S13

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization (1979) WHO Handbook for Reporting Results of Cancer Treatment. World Health Organization 48, Geneva

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester, UK

    H Anderson

  2. CRC Psychological Medicine Group, Christie Hospital NHS Trust, Manchester, UK

    P Hopwood

  3. Cancer Division, MRC Clinical Trials Unit, London, UK

    R J Stephens

  4. Department of Medical Oncology, Christie CRC Research Centre, Christie Hospital NHS Trust, Manchester, UK

    N Thatcher

  5. Clatterbridge Hospital, Bebbington, Liverpool, UK

    B Cottier

  6. Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Aberdeen, UK

    M Nicholson

  7. Stobhill NHS Trust, Glasgow, UK

    R Milroy

  8. Velindre Hospital, Whitchurch, Cardiff, UK

    T S Maughan

  9. Bristol Oncology Centre, Bristol, UK

    S J Falk

  10. Cookridge Hospital, Leeds, UK

    M G Bond

  11. Christie Hospital NHS Trust, Manchester, UK

    P A Burt

  12. Darlington Memorial Hospital, Darlington, UK

    C K Connolly

  13. Lancaster Royal Infirmary, Lancaster, UK

    M B McIllmurray

  14. City Hospital, Nottingham, UK

    J Carmichael

Authors
  1. H Anderson
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. P Hopwood
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. R J Stephens
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. N Thatcher
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. B Cottier
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. M Nicholson
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. R Milroy
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  8. T S Maughan
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  9. S J Falk
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  10. M G Bond
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  11. P A Burt
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  12. C K Connolly
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  13. M B McIllmurray
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  14. J Carmichael
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Consortia

on behalf of the UK NSCLC Gemcitabine Group

Rights and permissions

From twelve months after its original publication, this work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Anderson, H., Hopwood, P., Stephens, R. et al. Gemcitabine plus best supportive care (BSC) vs BSC in inoperable non-small cell lung cancer – a randomized trial with quality of life as the primary outcome. Br J Cancer 83, 447–453 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1054/bjoc.2000.1307

Download citation

  • Received: 23 March 2000

  • Revised: 23 March 2000

  • Accepted: 13 April 2000

  • Published: 25 July 2000

  • Issue Date: 01 August 2000

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1054/bjoc.2000.1307

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • gemcitabine
  • BSC
  • NSCLC
  • quality of life

This article is cited by

  • Patients and family caregivers report high treatment expectations during palliative chemotherapy: a longitudinal prospective study

    • Tine Ikander
    • Stefan Starup Jeppesen
    • Karin Brochstedt Dieperink

    BMC Palliative Care (2021)

  • The Japanese Lung Cancer Society Guideline for non-small cell lung cancer, stage IV

    • Hiroaki Akamatsu
    • Kiichiro Ninomiya
    • Nobuyuki Yamamoto

    International Journal of Clinical Oncology (2019)

  • Symptomlinderung durch Tumortherapie?

    • B. Alt-Epping
    • A.-L. Haas
    • F. Nauck

    Der Schmerz (2018)

  • A phase I pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic study of GTI-2040 in combination with gemcitabine in patients with solid tumors

    • Laeeq Malik
    • Anthony Zwiebel
    • James Cooper

    Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology (2018)

  • Formulation and preclinical evaluation of 99mTc–gemcitabine as a novel radiopharmaceutical for solid tumor imaging

    • A. B. Ibrahim
    • T. M. Sakr
    • M. T. El-Kolaly

    Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry (2014)

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Current issue
  • Collections
  • Follow us on Twitter
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Journal Information
  • Open access publishing
  • About the Editors
  • Contact
  • Special Issues
  • For Advertisers
  • Subscribe

Publish with us

  • For Authors & Referees
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

British Journal of Cancer (Br J Cancer)

ISSN 1532-1827 (online)

ISSN 0007-0920 (print)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
  • Cancel contracts here
Springer Nature

© 2025 Springer Nature Limited