Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
    • Special Collections
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
    • Editorial Board
    • ECR Advisory Board
    • Journal Staff
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
    • Accessibility
  • SUBSCRIBE

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
    • Special Collections
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
    • Editorial Board
    • ECR Advisory Board
    • Journal Staff
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
    • Accessibility
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
Articles, Neurobiology of Disease

Activation of the Liver X Receptor Increases Neuroactive Steroid Levels and Protects from Diabetes-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy

Gaia Cermenati, Silvia Giatti, Guido Cavaletti, Roberto Bianchi, Omar Maschi, Marzia Pesaresi, Federico Abbiati, Alessandro Volonterio, Enrique Saez, Donatella Caruso, Roberto Cosimo Melcangi and Nico Mitro
Journal of Neuroscience 8 September 2010, 30 (36) 11896-11901; https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1898-10.2010
Gaia Cermenati
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Silvia Giatti
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Guido Cavaletti
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Roberto Bianchi
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Omar Maschi
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Marzia Pesaresi
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Federico Abbiati
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alessandro Volonterio
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Enrique Saez
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Donatella Caruso
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Roberto Cosimo Melcangi
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nico Mitro
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Neuroactive steroids act in the peripheral nervous system as physiological regulators and as protective agents for acquired or inherited peripheral neuropathy. In recent years, modulation of neuroactive steroids levels has been studied as a potential therapeutic approach to protect peripheral nerves from damage induced by diabetes. Nuclear receptors of the liver X receptor (LXR) family regulate adrenal steroidogenesis via their ability to control cholesterol homeostasis. Here we show that rat sciatic nerve expresses both LRXα and β isoforms and that these receptors are functional. Activation of liver X receptors using a synthetic ligand results in increased levels of neurosteroids and protection of the sciatic nerve from neuropathy induced by diabetes. LXR ligand treatment of streptozotocin-treated rats increases expression in the sciatic nerve of steroidogenic acute regulatory protein (a molecule involved in the transfer of cholesterol into mitochondria), of the enzyme P450scc (responsible for conversion of cholesterol into pregnenolone), of 5α-reductase (an enzyme involved in the generation of neuroactive steroids) and of classical LXR targets involved in cholesterol efflux, such as ABCA1 and ABCG1. These effects were associated with increased levels of neuroactive steroids (e.g., pregnenolone, progesterone, dihydroprogesterone and 3α-diol) in the sciatic nerve, and with neuroprotective effects on thermal nociceptive activity, nerve conduction velocity, and Na+, K+-ATPase activity. These results suggest that LXR activation may represent a new pharmacological avenue to increase local neuroactive steroid levels that exert neuroprotective effects in diabetic neuropathy.

Introduction

Liver X receptors (LXRs) are ligand activated transcription factors that belong to the nuclear receptor superfamily. Two different isoforms, LXRα (NR1H3) and LXRβ (NR1H2) are known. LXRα is predominantly expressed in liver and at lower levels in intestine, macrophages, adipose tissue, lung, kidney and adrenal gland; LXRβ is broadly expressed (Li et al., 2004). The LXRs serve as cholesterol sensors that prevent excessive intracellular accumulation of cholesterol. Oxysterols (oxidized forms of cholesterol) activate the LXRs and induce expression of a battery of genes aimed at eliminating harmful concentrations of cholesterol, including genes involved in cholesterol efflux such as the ATP binding cassette family of transporters (e.g., ABCA1, ABCG1) (Beaven and Tontonoz, 2006; Cummins and Mangelsdorf, 2006).

Recently, it was reported that LXRs directly modulate steroidogenic acute regulatory protein (StAR) expression in the adrenal gland, a transfer protein regulating cholesterol shuttling into mitochondria, a key step in the initiation of steroid hormone synthesis (Cummins et al., 2006). Steroidogenesis also occurs in peripheral nerves where it results in the formation of neuroactive steroids (Garcia-Segura and Melcangi, 2006; Melcangi and Mensah-Nyagan, 2008; Roglio et al., 2008a). Peripheral nerves express proteins involved in the initiation of steroidogenesis, such as StAR and the translocator protein-18 kDa (TSPO), as well as the enzymes involved in the synthesis and metabolism of neuroactive steroids, such as cytochrome P450 side chain cleavage (P450scc), 3β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase, and 5α-reductase (5α-R) (Garcia-Segura and Melcangi, 2006; Melcangi et al., 2008; Roglio et al., 2008a). Neuroactive steroids act in peripheral nerves as physiological regulators and as protective agents for acquired and inherited peripheral neuropathy (Melcangi and Garcia-Segura, 2006; Schumacher et al., 2007; Roglio et al., 2008b; Melcangi and Panzica, 2009). This suggests that increasing the levels of neuroactive steroids directly in the nervous system could be a therapeutic approach that may avoid the potential endocrine side effects of systemic administration of neuroactive steroids. Indeed, we recently reported that a ligand of TSPO (Ro5-4864) that increases the local concentration of neuroactive steroids is effective at reducing the severity of diabetic neuropathy (Giatti et al., 2009).

Because the LXRs control steroidogenesis in other settings, here we have used the experimental model of streptozotocin (STZ)-induced diabetic neuropathy to evaluate whether treatment with synthetic LXR ligands (e.g., GW3965) is able to increase neuroactive steroid levels and exert neuroprotective effects. As described by Collins and coworkers (Collins et al., 2002), GW3965 binds and activates specifically LXRα and LXRβ, and no other nuclear receptors. GW3965 is a chemical tool widely used to understand the biology of the LXRs. We find that LXR activation drives neuroactive steroid synthesis in sciatic nerve, and that treatment with LXR ligands ameliorates diabetes-induced neuropathy, as judged by a variety of functional and biochemical parameters.

Materials and Methods

Reagents.

5-Pregnen-3β-ol-20-one (PREG), progesterone (PROG), 5α-pregnane-3, 20-dione (DHP), 3α-hydroxy-5α-pregnen-20-one (THP), 3β-hydroxy-5α-pregnen-20-one (isopregnanolone), testosterone (T), 5α-androstane-17β-ol-3-one (DHT), 5α-androstane-3α,17β-diol (3α-diol), and dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. 2,2,4,6,6–17α,21,21,21-D9-PROG (D9-PROG) was purchased from Medical Isotopes; 2,4,16,16-D4-17β-estradiol (D4-17β-E) was obtained from CDN Isotopes. 17,21,21,21-D4-PREG (D4-PREG) was kindly synthesized by Prof. P. Ferraboschi (Department of Medical Chemistry, Biochemistry and Biotechnology, Universitá di Milano, Milano, Italy). Solid phase extraction (SPE) cartridges (Discovery DS-C18 500 mg) were from Supelco. All solvents and reagents were HPLC grade (Sigma-Aldrich). GW3965 was synthesized in house as previously described (Marino et al., 2009).

Animals.

Two-month-old male Sprague Dawley rats, Crl:CD BR (Charles River) were used. The animals were maintained in quarters with controlled temperature and humidity. The light schedule was 14 h light and 10 h dark (lights on at 6:30 AM). The animals were handled following the European Union Normative (Council Directive 86/609/EEC), with the approval of the Institutional Animal Use and Care Committees. Special care was taken to minimize animal suffering and to reduce the number of animals used to the minimum required for statistical accuracy.

Induction of diabetes and experimental treatments.

Diabetes was induced by a single i.p. injection of freshly prepared streptozotocin (65 mg/kg; Sigma) in 0.09 m citrate buffer, pH 4.8. Control animals were injected with 0.09 m citrate buffer at pH 4.8. Hyperglycemia was confirmed 48 h after streptozotocin injection by measuring tail vein blood glucose levels using a glucometer OneTouch Ultra2 (LifeScan). Only animals with mean plasma glucose levels >300 mg/ml were classified as diabetic. Glycemia was also assessed before treatment with GW3965 (2 months after streptozotocin injection, see below) and before death, 3 months after streptozotocin administration. At 2 months, diabetic animals were treated once a week with GW3965 50 mg/kg (i.e., they received 4 subcutaneous injections). The rationale for the once a week treatment is that daily systemic activation of LXRs is thought to result in hypertriglyceridemia (due to increased hepatic lipogenesis), an undesirable side effect (Schultz et al., 2000). Thus, we sought to use the minimal dose of GW3965 that would show benefit while minimizing the potential for side effects.

Control rats received 200 μl of vehicle (sesame oil). Rats were killed 24 h after the last treatment.

Assessment of neuroactive steroids by liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry.

Samples were extracted and purified according to (Caruso et al., 2008). Briefly, samples (100 mg/tissue) were added with internal standards and homogenized in 2 ml of MeOH/acetic acid (99:1, v/v) using an ultrasonic homogenizer (Bransonic Ultrasonics). After an overnight incubation at 4°C, samples were centrifuged at 12,000 rpm for 5 min and the pellet was extracted twice with 1 ml of MeOH/acetic acid (99:1, v/v). The organic phases were combined and dried with a gentle stream of nitrogen in a 40°C water bath. Samples were resuspended with 3 ml of MeOH/H2O (10:90, v/v) and passed through an SPE cartridge, previously activated with MeOH (5 ml) and MeOH:H2O 10:90 (v/v) (5 ml). Steroids were eluted in MeOH, concentrated and transferred into auto-sampler vials before liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (LC–MS/MS) analysis. Quantitative analysis was performed on the basis of calibration curves prepared and analyzed using deuterated internal standards. Calibration curves were extracted and analyzed as described above for samples.

Positive atmospheric pressure chemical ionization (APCI) experiments were performed using a linear ion trap-mass spectrometer (LTQ, Thermo Electron) equipped with a Surveyor liquid chromatography Pump Plus and a Surveyor Autosampler Plus (Thermo Electron). The LC mobile phases were (A) H2O/0.1% formic acid and (B) methanol (MeOH)/0.1% formic acid. The gradient (flow rate 0.5 ml/min) was as follows: T0.0 70% A, T1.5 70% A, T2.0 55% A, T3.0 55% A, T35.0 36% A, T40.0 25% A, T41.0 1% A, T45.0 1% A, T45.2 70% A, T55.0 70% A. The split valve was set at 0–6.99 min to waste, 6.99–43.93 min to source and 43.93–55 to waste. The Hypersil Gold column (100 × 3 mm, 3 μm; Thermo Electron) was maintained at 40°C. The injection volume was 25 μl and the injector needle was washed with MeOH/ water 1/1 (v/v). Peaks of the LC–MS/MS were evaluated using a Dell workstation by means of the software Excalibur release 2.0 SR2 (Thermo Electron).

The mass spectrometer was operated in the positive ion mode with the APCI source using nitrogen as sheath, auxiliary and sweep gas at flow rates of 23, 8, 2 (arbitrary units), respectively. Other ion-source parameters: vaporizer temperature 450°C, ion-source collision-energy (SID) 20 V, capillary temperature 275°C. The mass spectrometer was used in MS/MS mode using helium as collision gas. The relative collision-energy was set at 35% for D4-17β-E, 3α-diol and at 35% using the Wide Band Activation mode (Thermo Electron) for all the other steroids. Samples were analyzed using the transitions previously reported by (Pesaresi et al., 2010).

Thermal nociceptive threshold.

Nociceptive threshold to radiant heat was quantified using the hot plate paw withdrawal test as previously described (Bianchi et al., 2004). Briefly, a 40 cm high Plexiglas cylinder was suspended over the hot plate and the temperature was maintained at 50 ± 0.2°C. Paw withdrawal latency was defined as the time between placing the rat on the hot plate and the time of withdrawal, or licking of hindpaw, or discomfort manifested by the animal. The test was done every 2 weeks starting from the second week after STZ injection. Animals were tested twice, with a 30 min interval between tests.

Nerve conduction velocity.

At the end of treatment, antidromic tail NCV was assessed using a Myto EBNeuro electromyography apparatus as previously described (Tredici et al., 1998; Meregalli et al., 2010). Briefly, recording ring electrodes were placed distally in the tail of unanesthetized animals. The stimulating ring electrodes were placed 5 and 10 cm proximally with respect to the recording point. Latency of the potentials recorded at the two sites after nerve stimulation was determined (peak-to-peak, stimulus duration 100 ms, filter 1 Hz–5 MHz) and NCV calculated. All neurophysiological studies were done under standard conditions in a temperature-controlled room adjacent to the animal housing room. Body temperature and vital conditions of the animals were monitored during the neurophysiological examination.

Na+, K+-ATPase activity.

Tibial stumps were dissected out, desheathed and homogenized in a chilled solution containing 0.25 m sucrose, 1.25 mm EGTA and 10 mm Tris, pH 7.5, at 1:20 (w/v) in a glass-glass Elvehjem–Potter homogenizer (DISA), and stored at −80°C for ATPase determinations. Na+, K+-ATPase activity was determined spectrophotometrically as previously described (Bianchi et al., 2004). Protein content in homogenates was determined by Lowry's method with bovine serum albumin as standard.

Real-time PCR.

RNA was prepared using the Nucleospin RNA II kit (Macherey-Nagel). RNA was analyzed by a TaqMan qRT-PCR (quantitative real-time) instrument (CFX384 real time system, Bio-Rad Laboratories) using the iScriptTM one-step RT-PCR kit for probes (Bio-Rad Laboratories). Samples were run in 384 well formats in triplicate as multiplexed reactions with a normalizing internal control (36B4). Probe and primer sequences were purchased from Eurofins MWG-Operon, and are available on request.

Statistical analysis.

Quantitative data were analyzed through statistical analysis according with the experimental protocols and the nature of the data. Data from experiments with more than two variables were analyzed by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey–Kramer posttest. A p ≤ 0.05 indicates a statistically significant effect. All statistical analyses were performed in GraphPad PRISM (version 5).

Results

The LXRs are active in sciatic nerve

To investigate the potential role of LXRs in diabetes-induced peripheral neuropathy we first assessed whether the two isoforms of LXR are expressed in a peripheral nerve, such as the rat sciatic nerve, and whether their levels change in diabetic animals. LXRα and LXRβ are both expressed in rat sciatic nerve and their mRNA levels are unaffected by diabetes (Fig. 1A). LXRβ is the dominant isoform present in sciatic nerve. The expression of LXRα and LXRβ in sciatic nerve is substantially lower than that in liver, a tissue with considerable LXR activity. To establish whether the levels of LXR present in sciatic nerve are of functional significance, we measured LXR target gene expression after administration of a synthetic LXR ligand. GW3965 was given once a week for a month to STZ-treated rats 2 months after the induction of diabetes. Expression of two bona fide LXR target genes involved in cholesterol efflux (ABCA1 and ABCG1), which are not regulated in sciatic nerve in this model of diabetes, was significantly increased after treatment with GW3965 (Fig. 1B), indicating that LXRs are active transcriptional regulators in sciatic nerve. In contrast, GW3965 treatment did not affect expression of key regulators of cholesterol synthesis, such as HMGCoA reductase and SREBP-2 (Fig. 1 C).

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

A, LXRα and LXRβ are expressed in sciatic nerve and their levels are unchanged between control and STZ-treated rats. B, LXR activation by GW3965 treatment induces mRNA levels of ABCA1 and ABCG1, classical LXR target genes involved in cholesterol efflux in the sciatic nerve. These data indicate that the ligand reaches the sciatic nerve and that the LXRs are activated. C, Expression levels of HMGCoA reductase and SREBP-2, two genes involved in cholesterol synthesis. The mRNA levels of these genes are unchanged by diabetes and/or by GW3965 treatment. The bars represent the relative mRNA expression of shown genes to the housekeeping gene 36B4. Data are presented as mean ± SEM (n = 9). Statistical analysis is performed by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey–Kramer posttest. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.001 vs control rats; #p < 0.05, ##p < 0.001 vs STZ-treated rats.

Activation of LXR modulates neuroactive steroid levels

Compared with normoglycemic controls, diabetic rats showed notable differences in expression of several important genes involved in steroidogenesis and neuroactive steroid metabolism. In particular, mRNA levels of StAR and TSPO (molecules involved in cholesterol shuttling into the mitochondria), P450scc (the enzyme responsible of the conversion of cholesterol into pregnenolone), and 5α-R (which converts progesterone and testosterone into their 5α-reduced metabolites, dihydroprogesterone and dihydrotestosterone) were significantly decreased in the diabetic state (Fig. 2). Treatment of diabetic animals with an LXR activator restored mRNA levels of StAR, P450scc and 5α-R to the level seen in normoglycemic controls, but had no effect on TSPO expression (Fig. 2). In agreement with these gene expression patterns, we observed that diabetes decreased neuroactive steroid levels in sciatic nerve, and that treatment with an LXR ligand counteracted these effects. Indeed, LC–MS/MS analysis showed that the levels of PREG, PROG, DHP, isopregnanolone, T and its derivatives, DHT and 5α-androstane-3α,17β-diol (3α-diol) were significantly decreased in the sciatic nerve of diabetic rats (Table 1). LXR activation completely reversed the diabetes-induced decrease in PREG, PROG, DHP and 3α-diol levels. Interestingly, the levels of these neuroactive steroids also fell in the plasma of diabetic rats, but treatment with the LXR agonist had no effect on them (Table 2).

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

Gene expression of steroidogenic acute regulatory protein (StAR), translocator protein-18 kDa (TSPO), cytochrome P450 side chain cleavage (P450scc) and 5α-reductase (5α-R), in sciatic nerve. As shown, LXR activation by GW3965 treatment in diabetic rats restores to normal levels the expression of StAR, P450scc and 5α-R but it does not affect TSPO levels. The bars represent the relative mRNA expression of shown genes to the housekeeping gene 36B4. Data are presented as mean ± SEM (n = 9). Statistical analysis is performed by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey–Kramer posttest. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.001 vs control rats; #p < 0.05, ##p < 0.001 vs STZ-treated rats.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

Analysis of neuroactive steroid levels by LC–MS/MS in sciatic nerves of control, STZ, and STZ rats treated with GW3965

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2.

Analysis of neuroactive steroids levels by LC–MS/MS in plasma of control, STZ, and STZ rats treated with GW3965

LXR ligands reduce diabetes-induced neuropathy

Since activation of LXRs in diabetic sciatic nerves restored neuroactive steroid levels to a near-normal state, we examined whether this LXR-mediated increase could be associated with a neuroprotective effect. Table 3 shows that 3 months after the induction of diabetes, STZ-treated rats had higher blood glucose and significantly lower weight than nondiabetic control rats. Plasma levels of triglycerides and nonesterified fatty acids were unaffected by diabetes. Treatment with an LXR agonist had no effect on these parameters. However, LXR activation did result in significant neuroprotective effects as measured by functional and biochemical tests. Treatment with GW3965 was able to significantly reduce the increase in thermal sensitivity brought about by diabetes (Fig. 3). In addition to this decrease in thermal nociceptive threshold in LXR ligand-treated animals, we also observed that antidromic tail nerve conduction velocity (NCV), which is significantly reduced by diabetes, was enhanced by LXR ligand treatment. Moreover, treatment with the LXR agonist reverted the reduction in Na+, K+-ATPase activity in sciatic nerve brought about by diabetes (Fig. 3). In contrast to these neuroprotective effects mediated by LXR activation, treatment with GW3965 did not consistently counter the diabetes-induced decrease in expression of myelin proteins (i.e., P0, PMP22, MAL and MAG) observed in the sciatic nerve of STZ-treated animals, even if a tendency to reach significance was observed in case of P0 and PMP22 (Fig. 4).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 3.

Body weight and blood chemistry of control, STZ, and STZ rats treated with GW3965

Figure 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3.

Thermal sensitivity, nerve conduction velocity, and Na+, K+-ATPase activity in control, STZ and STZ treated with GW3965 rats. Data are expressed as withdrawal latency in seconds for heat sensitivity threshold (control, n = 10, STZ, n = 12; STZ + GW3965, n = 14), as m/s for NCV (control, n = 14; STZ, n = 12; STZ + GW3965, n = 14) and as μmol Pi/h per mg protein for Na+, K+-ATPase (control, n = 6; STZ n = 7; STZ + GW3965, n = 6), and are mean ± SEM. Statistical analysis is performed by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey–Kramer posttest. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.001 vs control rats; #p < 0.05, ##p < 0.001 vs STZ-treated rats.

Figure 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 4.

Gene expression of myelin proteins in sciatic nerve. The bars represent the relative mRNA expression of shown genes to the housekeeping gene 36B4. Data are presented as mean ± SEM (n = 9). Statistical analysis is performed by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey–Kramer posttest. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.001 vs control rats.

Discussion

Diabetes is a leading cause of mortality worldwide. Chronic hyperglycemia usually results in complications such as high blood pressure, blindness, kidney malfunction, and nervous system disease (ADA, 2007; Herman, 2007). Diabetic neuropathy appears frequently in patients diagnosed with either type 1 or type 2 diabetes; in fact, 60% to 70% of diabetics develop nerve injuries. Nerve malfunction and damage is primarily due to decreased blood flow and high blood glucose levels; the extent of abnormalities is more pronounced if the hyperglycemia is not controlled properly. Peripheral nerve injuries may affect cranial nerves or nerves from the spinal column and their branches (Sugimoto et al., 2000; Vinik et al., 2000).

Neuroactive steroids have been shown to exert neuroprotective effects in experimental models of diabetic neuropathy (Leonelli et al., 2007). We have recently shown that increasing cholesterol shuttling into the mitochondria using a TSPO ligand resulted in an increase in the low levels of neuroactive steroids present in the sciatic nerve of diabetic animals that was accompanied by nerve protective effects (Giatti et al., 2009). Here, we report similar findings using synthetic activators of the LXR nuclear receptors. The low levels of PREG (the first steroid formed from cholesterol) measured in sciatic nerve of STZ-treated diabetic animals (Pesaresi et al., 2010) were increased upon LXR ligand treatment. LXR activation is known to play a role in steroidogenesis in the adrenal gland, directly regulating StAR expression, an important molecule involved in the initial process of steroidogenesis (Cummins and Mangelsdorf, 2006). In agreement with these results, we find that in peripheral nerves, such as the sciatic nerve, activation of LXR in the context of diabetes restores normal StAR mRNA levels. Moreover, we also find that the mRNA levels of P450scc, the enzyme converting cholesterol to PREG, are completely restored to nondiabetic levels in STZ-treated rats dosed with GW3965. In contrast, TSPO expression was not influenced by treatment with GW3965. Whether simultaneous activation of StAR and TSPO is necessary to activate steroidogenesis is a subject of debate (Bogan et al., 2007; Rone et al., 2009). In our study, the normalization of StAR and P450scc mRNA levels may be sufficient to account for the increased levels of PREG measured in sciatic nerve. We also found restored levels of PROG and its metabolite DHP, as well as metabolites of T, such as 3α-diol, in the sciatic nerve of diabetic rats treated with the LXR ligand. At least in the case of PROG and DHP, the increased levels observed in LXR-treated diabetic rats may be due to greater availability of their precursors (e.g., PREG), as well as to increased expression of the enzyme that generates DHP (e.g., 5α-reductase). Interestingly, LXR activation did not affect plasma levels of PREG, PROG, DHP and 3α-diol demonstrating that the increase on neuroactive steroids levels we observed was due to enhanced local production and not to uptake from the periphery. This observation is quite significant because increasing levels of neuroactive steroids directly in the nervous system and not in plasma, may avoid possible endocrine side effects exerted by these molecules. These findings contrast with what we previously observed on diabetic animals treated with a TSPO ligand. Treatment with Ro5-4864 led to an increase not only of PREG and PROG, as with GW3965 treatment, but also of DHT (a metabolite of T). Moreover, the increase of PROG and T levels occurred locally and in plasma (Giatti et al., 2009). These observations suggest somewhat different mechanisms of action for LXR and TSPO ligands, an issue to be explored in future experiments.

Because LXR activation restored local production of neuroactive steroids, we tested whether these effects resulted in neuroprotection in diabetic STZ-treated rats. Treatment with an LXR ligand ameliorated the impairment in NCV, thermal threshold, and Na+, K+-ATPase activity brought about by the diabetic state. It is interesting to note that these functional and biochemical parameters are also affected by TSPO ligand (Giatti et al., 2009). However, at variance to what we observed with TSPO ligand, treatment with LXR ligand did not significantly affect expression of myelin proteins, suggesting yet again that the mechanism of action by which LXR and TSPO activation evoke protective effects in peripheral nerve may be different. These results are in agreement with what we have observed in diabetic rats treated with PROG, T or their metabolites (Leonelli et al., 2007; Roglio et al., 2007). It is likely that LXR activation exerts its neuroprotective effects primarily by increasing the levels of PREG, PROG, DHP and 3α-diol in the sciatic nerve. In this context, it is important to remember that these neuroactive steroids wield their effects via classical and nonclassical steroid receptors (i.e., PROG and DHP are ligands of the progesterone receptor while 3α-diol activates the GABA-A receptor and estrogen receptor β) (Melcangi et al., 2008). Thus, a participation of these receptors in neuroprotective effects exerted by LXR ligand may be hypothesized. LXR activation may impact neuroactive steroid levels through its ability to regulate transcription of genes involved in cholesterol homeostasis. In this study, expression of HMGCoA reductase and SREBP-2, key regulators of cholesterol synthesis, was unchanged among experimental groups, suggesting that enhanced cholesterol synthesis is not responsible for the increased neuroactive steroid levels seen with LXR activation in the sciatic nerve. Thus, we hypothesize that the benefits of LXR activation in this setting are due to a promotion of cholesterol utilization, similar to what is seen in the adrenal gland (Cummins et al., 2006). In support of this idea, we observed an upregulation of cholesterol efflux genes, such as ABCA1 and ABCG1, in the sciatic nerve of animals treated with GW3965. These genes are direct LXR targets, and their induction would be expected to maintain the level of free cholesterol at a safe limit by promoting cholesterol efflux.

In summary, as shown in Figure 5, we demonstrate that LXR activation in a diabetic setting that results in peripheral neuropathy can have a beneficial effect. LXR activation promotes steroidogenesis, cholesterol disposal, and raises the local levels of neuroactive steroids. These effects are associated with neuroprotection against peripheral neuropathy induced by diabetes. The present data extend the neuroprotective actions of LXR so far observed in multiple neuronal injury models, such as ischemic brain injury, Alzheimer's disease, and Niemann-Pick C disease (Repa et al., 2007; Zelcer et al., 2007; Morales et al., 2008; Sironi et al., 2008; Cheng et al., 2010). Finally, we are suggesting for the first time that LXR may be a promising therapeutic target for diabetic neuropathy.

Figure 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 5.

Proposed model of LXRs activation in diabetic neuropathy. The entrance of cholesterol into mitochondria is accomplished by the steroidogenic acute regulatory protein (StAR), a transport protein that regulates cholesterol transfer from the outer mitochondrial membrane to the inner membrane. Here, cholesterol is the substrate of P450scc enzyme, the first enzymatic step in the neuroactive steroid synthesis. A, In the diabetic state, we observed a reduced neuroactive steroid synthesis in the sciatic nerve due to decreased expression of StAR, P450scc and 5α-reductase (5α-R). B, The treatment of diabetic rats with the GW3965, a LXR synthetic ligand, restored the expression of the steroidogenic enzymes, and the neuroactive steroid levels affected by diabetic neuropathy. Moreover, LXR activation also induced the expression of the cholesterol efflux genes such as ABCA1 and ABCG1. In conclusion, the activation of LXRs promotes cholesterol utilization and finally protects from peripheral neuropathy-induced diabetes.

Footnotes

  • This work is supported by a Giovanni Armenise-Harvard Foundation Career Development grant (N.M.); by PRIN (Programmi di ricerca di Rilevante Interesse Nazionale) Grant 2007, 4SYCM_002 (R.C.M.); and by National Institutes of Health Grant DK081003 (E.S.). We thank Drs. Maurizio Crestani and Emma De Fabiani (Department of Pharmacological Sciences, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milano, Italy) for critically reading the manuscript, and Elda Desiderio Pinto for administrative assistance.

  • Correspondence should be addressed to either Nico Mitro, Giovanni Armenise-Harvard Foundation Laboratory, Department of Pharmacological Sciences, or Roberto Cosimo Melcangi, Department of Endocrinology, Pathophysiology and Applied Biology (DEFIB), “Center of Excellence on Neurodegenerative Diseases” (CEND), Università degli Studi di Milano, Via Balzaretti 9, 20133, Milano, Italy. nico.mitro{at}unimi.it or roberto.melcangi{at}unimi.it

References

  1. ↵
    1. American Diabetes Association [ADA]
    (2007) Standards of medical care in diabetes—2007. Diabetes Care 30(Suppl 1):S4–S41.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    1. Beaven SW,
    2. Tontonoz P
    (2006) Nuclear receptors in lipid metabolism: targeting the heart of dyslipidemia. Annu Rev Med 57:313–329.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Bianchi R,
    2. Buyukakilli B,
    3. Brines M,
    4. Savino C,
    5. Cavaletti G,
    6. Oggioni N,
    7. Lauria G,
    8. Borgna M,
    9. Lombardi R,
    10. Cimen B,
    11. Comelekoglu U,
    12. Kanik A,
    13. Tataroglu C,
    14. Cerami A,
    15. Ghezzi P
    (2004) Erythropoietin both protects from and reverses experimental diabetic neuropathy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101:823–828.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    1. Bogan RL,
    2. Davis TL,
    3. Niswender GD
    (2007) Peripheral-type benzodiazepine receptor (PBR) aggregation and absence of steroidogenic acute regulatory protein (StAR)/PBR association in the mitochondrial membrane as determined by bioluminescence resonance energy transfer (BRET) J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 104:61–67.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Caruso D,
    2. Scurati S,
    3. Maschi O,
    4. De Angelis L,
    5. Roglio I,
    6. Giatti S,
    7. Garcia-Segura LM,
    8. Melcangi RC
    (2008) Evaluation of neuroactive steroid levels by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry in central and peripheral nervous system: effect of diabetes. Neurochem Int 52:560–568.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Cheng O,
    2. Ostrowski RP,
    3. Liu W,
    4. Zhang JH
    (2010) Activation of liver X receptor reduces global ischemic brain injury by reduction of nuclear factor-kappaB. Neuroscience 166:1101–1109.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Collins JL,
    2. Fivush AM,
    3. Watson MA,
    4. Galardi CM,
    5. Lewis MC,
    6. Moore LB,
    7. Parks DJ,
    8. Wilson JG,
    9. Tippin TK,
    10. Binz JG,
    11. Plunket KD,
    12. Morgan DG,
    13. Beaudet EJ,
    14. Whitney KD,
    15. Kliewer SA,
    16. Willson TM
    (2002) Identification of a nonsteroidal liver X receptor agonist through parallel array synthesis of tertiary amines. J Med Chem 45:1963–1966.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Cummins CL,
    2. Mangelsdorf DJ
    (2006) Liver X receptors and cholesterol homoeostasis: spotlight on the adrenal gland. Biochem Soc Trans 34:1110–1113.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Cummins CL,
    2. Volle DH,
    3. Zhang Y,
    4. McDonald JG,
    5. Sion B,
    6. Lefrançois-Martinez AM,
    7. Caira F,
    8. Veyssière G,
    9. Mangelsdorf DJ,
    10. Lobaccaro JM
    (2006) Liver X receptors regulate adrenal cholesterol balance. J Clin Invest 116:1902–1912.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Garcia-Segura LM,
    2. Melcangi RC
    (2006) Steroids and glial cell function. Glia 54:485–498.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Giatti S,
    2. Pesaresi M,
    3. Cavaletti G,
    4. Bianchi R,
    5. Carozzi V,
    6. Lombardi R,
    7. Maschi O,
    8. Lauria G,
    9. Garcia-Segura LM,
    10. Caruso D,
    11. Melcangi RC
    (2009) Neuroprotective effects of a ligand of translocator protein-18 kDa (Ro5-4864) in experimental diabetic neuropathy. Neuroscience 164:520–529.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Herman WH
    (2007) Diabetes epidemiology: guiding clinical and public health practice: the Kelly West Award Lecture, 2006. Diabetes Care 30:1912–1919.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  13. ↵
    1. Leonelli E,
    2. Bianchi R,
    3. Cavaletti G,
    4. Caruso D,
    5. Crippa D,
    6. Garcia-Segura LM,
    7. Lauria G,
    8. Magnaghi V,
    9. Roglio I,
    10. Melcangi RC
    (2007) Progesterone and its derivatives are neuroprotective agents in experimental diabetic neuropathy: a multimodal analysis. Neuroscience 144:1293–1304.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Li AC,
    2. Glass CK
    (2004) PPAR- and LXR-dependent pathways controlling lipid metabolism and the development of atherosclerosis. J Lipid Res 45:2161–2173.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. ↵
    1. Marino JP Jr.,
    2. Kallander LS,
    3. Ma C,
    4. Oh HJ,
    5. Lee D,
    6. Gaitanopoulos DE,
    7. Krawiec JA,
    8. Parks DJ,
    9. Webb CL,
    10. Ziegler K,
    11. Jaye M,
    12. Thompson SK
    (2009) The discovery of tertiary-amine LXR agonists with potent cholesterol efflux activity in macrophages. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 19:5617–5621.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Melcangi RC,
    2. Garcia-Segura LM
    (2006) Therapeutic approaches to peripheral neuropathy based on neuroactive steroids. Expert Rev Neurother 6:1121–1125.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    1. Melcangi RC,
    2. Mensah-Nyagan AG
    (2008) Neurosteroids: measurement and pathophysiologic relevance. Neurochem Int 52:503–505.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. Melcangi RC,
    2. Panzica G
    (2009) Neuroactive steroids: an update of their roles in central and peripheral nervous system. Psychoneuroendocrinology 34(Suppl 1):S1–S8.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  19. ↵
    1. Melcangi RC,
    2. Garcia-Segura LM,
    3. Mensah-Nyagan AG
    (2008) Neuroactive steroids: state of the art and new perspectives. Cell Mol Life Sci 65:777–797.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    1. Meregalli C,
    2. Canta A,
    3. Carozzi VA,
    4. Chiorazzi A,
    5. Oggioni N,
    6. Gilardini A,
    7. Ceresa C,
    8. Avezza F,
    9. Crippa L,
    10. Marmiroli P,
    11. Cavaletti G
    (2010) Bortezomib-induced painful neuropathy in rats: a behavioral, neurophysiological and pathological study in rats. Eur J Pain 14:343–350.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    1. Morales JR,
    2. Ballesteros I,
    3. Deniz JM,
    4. Hurtado O,
    5. Vivancos J,
    6. Nombela F,
    7. Lizasoain I,
    8. Castrillo A,
    9. Moro MA
    (2008) Activation of liver X receptors promotes neuroprotection and reduces brain inflammation in experimental stroke. Circulation 118:1450–1459.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. ↵
    1. Pesaresi M,
    2. Maschi O,
    3. Giatti S,
    4. Garcia-Segura LM,
    5. Caruso D,
    6. Melcangi RC
    (2010) Sex differences in neuroactive steroid levels in the nervous system of diabetic and non-diabetic rats. Horm Behav 57:46–55.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    1. Repa JJ,
    2. Li H,
    3. Frank-Cannon TC,
    4. Valasek MA,
    5. Turley SD,
    6. Tansey MG,
    7. Dietschy JM
    (2007) Liver X receptor activation enhances cholesterol loss from the brain, decreases neuroinflammation, and increases survival of the NPC1 mouse. J Neurosci 27:14470–14480.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. ↵
    1. Roglio I,
    2. Bianchi R,
    3. Giatti S,
    4. Cavaletti G,
    5. Caruso D,
    6. Scurati S,
    7. Crippa D,
    8. Garcia-Segura LM,
    9. Camozzi F,
    10. Lauria G,
    11. Melcangi RC
    (2007) Testosterone derivatives are neuroprotective agents in experimental diabetic neuropathy. Cell Mol Life Sci 64:1158–1168.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. ↵
    1. Roglio I,
    2. Giatti S,
    3. Pesaresi M,
    4. Bianchi R,
    5. Cavaletti G,
    6. Lauria G,
    7. Garcia-Segura LM,
    8. Melcangi RC
    (2008a) Neuroactive steroids and peripheral neuropathy. Brain Res Rev 57:460–469.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. ↵
    1. Roglio I,
    2. Bianchi R,
    3. Gotti S,
    4. Scurati S,
    5. Giatti S,
    6. Pesaresi M,
    7. Caruso D,
    8. Panzica GC,
    9. Melcangi RC
    (2008b) Neuroprotective effects of dihydroprogesterone and progesterone in an experimental model of nerve crush injury. Neuroscience 155:673–685.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. ↵
    1. Rone MB,
    2. Fan J,
    3. Papadopoulos V
    (2009) Cholesterol transport in steroid biosynthesis: role of protein-protein interactions and implications in disease states. Biochim Biophys Acta 1791:646–658.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. ↵
    1. Schultz JR,
    2. Tu H,
    3. Luk A,
    4. Repa JJ,
    5. Medina JC,
    6. Li L,
    7. Schwendner S,
    8. Wang S,
    9. Thoolen M,
    10. Mangelsdorf DJ,
    11. Lustig KD,
    12. Shan B
    (2000) Role of LXRs in control of lipogenesis. Genes Dev 14:2831–2838.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  29. ↵
    1. Schumacher M,
    2. Guennoun R,
    3. Stein DG,
    4. De Nicola AF
    (2007) Progesterone: therapeutic opportunities for neuroprotection and myelin repair. Pharmacol Ther 116:77–106.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. ↵
    1. Sironi L,
    2. Mitro N,
    3. Cimino M,
    4. Gelosa P,
    5. Guerrini U,
    6. Tremoli E,
    7. Saez E
    (2008) Treatment with LXR agonists after focal cerebral ischemia prevents brain damage. FEBS Lett 582:3396–3400.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. ↵
    1. Sugimoto K,
    2. Murakawa Y,
    3. Sima AA
    (2000) Diabetic neuropathy—a continuing enigma. Diabetes Metab Res Rev 16:408–433.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. ↵
    1. Tredici G,
    2. Buccellato FR,
    3. Braga M,
    4. Cavaletti G,
    5. Ciscato P,
    6. Moggio M,
    7. Scalabrino G
    (1998) Polyneuropathy due to cobalamin deficiency in the rat. J Neurol Sci 156:18–29.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. ↵
    1. Vinik AI,
    2. Park TS,
    3. Stansberry KB,
    4. Pittenger GL
    (2000) Diabetic neuropathies. Diabetologia 43:957–973.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. ↵
    1. Zelcer N,
    2. Khanlou N,
    3. Clare R,
    4. Jiang Q,
    5. Reed-Geaghan EG,
    6. Landreth GE,
    7. Vinters HV,
    8. Tontonoz P
    (2007) Attenuation of neuroinflammation and Alzheimer's disease pathology by liver x receptors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104:10601–10606.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 30 (36)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 30, Issue 36
8 Sep 2010
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Advertising (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Activation of the Liver X Receptor Increases Neuroactive Steroid Levels and Protects from Diabetes-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Activation of the Liver X Receptor Increases Neuroactive Steroid Levels and Protects from Diabetes-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy
Gaia Cermenati, Silvia Giatti, Guido Cavaletti, Roberto Bianchi, Omar Maschi, Marzia Pesaresi, Federico Abbiati, Alessandro Volonterio, Enrique Saez, Donatella Caruso, Roberto Cosimo Melcangi, Nico Mitro
Journal of Neuroscience 8 September 2010, 30 (36) 11896-11901; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1898-10.2010

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
Activation of the Liver X Receptor Increases Neuroactive Steroid Levels and Protects from Diabetes-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy
Gaia Cermenati, Silvia Giatti, Guido Cavaletti, Roberto Bianchi, Omar Maschi, Marzia Pesaresi, Federico Abbiati, Alessandro Volonterio, Enrique Saez, Donatella Caruso, Roberto Cosimo Melcangi, Nico Mitro
Journal of Neuroscience 8 September 2010, 30 (36) 11896-11901; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1898-10.2010
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

Articles

  • Memory Retrieval Has a Dynamic Influence on the Maintenance Mechanisms That Are Sensitive to ζ-Inhibitory Peptide (ZIP)
  • Neurophysiological Evidence for a Cortical Contribution to the Wakefulness-Related Drive to Breathe Explaining Hypocapnia-Resistant Ventilation in Humans
  • Monomeric Alpha-Synuclein Exerts a Physiological Role on Brain ATP Synthase
Show more Articles

Neurobiology of Disease

  • Multi-omics analysis reveals miR-7220-5p alleviates N2O addictive behaviors via NR2B/ERK/CREB signaling
  • Disrupted Neurogenesis from Basal Intermediate Precursor Cells Alters the Postnatal Neocortex in the TcMAC21 Mouse model of Down Syndrome
  • Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Neuroimaging of the Pink1-/- Rat Parkinson Disease Model with the Norepinephrine Transporter (NET) Ligand [18F]NS12137
Show more Neurobiology of Disease
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Follow SFN on BlueSky
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Notice
  • Contact
  • Accessibility
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2025 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.