User talk:BD2412

This user prefers to communicate
on-wiki, rather than by email.

Status: Active. bd2412 T

This administrator prefers not to fulfill solicited administrative actions, per Wikipedia:Solicited administrator actions.; Dispute resolution clause: By posting on my user talk page, you agree to resolve all disputes that may arise from your interactions with me through the dispute resolution processes offered within the Wikipedia Community. BD2412
Archives: By topic (prior to June 1, 2009):; Articles-1st/Deletion-1st-2d/Law-1st-2d-3d-4th-5th; Misc.-1st-2d-3d-4th/RfA-1st-2d-3d-4th/Tools-1st-2nd-3rd/Vandalism

Dated (beginning June 1, 2009):

001-002-003-004-005-006-007-008-009-010-011-012-013-014-015-016

017-018-019-020-021-022-023-024-025-026-027-028-029-030-031-032

033-034-035-036-037-038-039-040-041-042-043-044-045-046-047-048

049-050-051-052-053-054-055-056-057-058-059-060-061-062-063

A barnstar for you!

	The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
	Congratulations on hitting 2,500,000 edits! Best wishes. Red Director (talk) 01:42, 1 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Red Director: Thanks! I knew I was around there. BD2412 T 01:53, 1 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: William King Atkinson has been accepted

William King Atkinson, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

BD2412 T 18:53, 1 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Elizabeth Uihlein

I saw you poking around on my Elizabeth draft -- if you feel like we should make a separate page for her, as I do, I would appreciate your help in lobbying for a change. The couple's page is stupid long because people won't let it get split and it's an inevitability that it has to happen because one of them is going to die and then the other one is just going to keep trucking away with their usual business. Also I think we can make a really good case that it's similar to the Adelson's where combining them would have been a massive mistake. SprinklerLover12 (talk) 16:32, 2 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@SprinklerLover12: I tend to agree that notable individuals should have individual pages, outside of very rare "Bonnie and Clyde"-type circumstances that do not exist here. I would certainly support a split in this case. BD2412 T 16:38, 2 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Unreferenced-law section

Template:Unreferenced-law section has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 13:22, 3 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: I commented in support of the deletion of this outdated template in the discussion. BD2412 T 22:46, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Frank Hollingsworth has been accepted

Frank Hollingsworth, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

BD2412 T 17:16, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Beaver Creek (Pennsylvania)

The article Beaver Creek (Pennsylvania) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not encyclopedic.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This is an automated notification. Please refer to the page's history for further information. DatBot (talk) 00:31, 9 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

De-PRODded, per rationale provided in the edit summary of that edit. BD2412 T 00:39, 9 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Frank B. Goudy has been accepted

Frank B. Goudy, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

BD2412 T 01:41, 11 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Warren Truitt has been accepted

Warren Truitt, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

BD2412 T 00:00, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sidebar links are unclickable on your userpage

I was trying to find a post you had recently made, and went to your userpage to click and view your "User contributions". Unfortunately, none of the standard links in the lefthand sidebar of your userpage are clickable, apparently due to the bouncing graphic of the Wikipedia globe. I tried another browser and got the same result. I could not click any of the lefthand links until I went to your usertalk instead. Just thought you'd like to know .... Softlavender (talk) 22:30, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Softlavender: I have had that bouncing ball forever, and I guess it's time to retire it. BD2412 T 00:40, 14 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

LOL. Softlavender (talk) 00:42, 14 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: New Orleans School of Medicine has been accepted

New Orleans School of Medicine, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

BD2412 T 02:23, 14 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ology

Not appropriate for the AfD, but you would not believe the fabricated words I removed from List of words with the suffix -ology when I starting working on this in response to a request to to WP:LISTS. There were so many redlinked words with no confirmation that these were actually words. The first I boldly removed was woodpeckerology, still my favorite. The person who created the list saved a copy before I made deep cuts because they thought it was useful to list everything. Maybe, if we could say "this is not a real word". Anyway, this strange application of -ology does seem to make it unique amongst the suffixes. Although "ish" had it moment. Rublamb (talk) 03:22, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

wikt:mixology? E Eng 04:49, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:19th-century American judges by state has been nominated for deletion

Category:19th-century American judges by state has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. SomeoneDreaming (talk) 15:47, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Maxposure Media Group

Hello, BD2412,

When you are restoring and moving articles to Draft space, please do not forget about the talk page. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:57, 17 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Liz: I thought that was done automatically. Is it not? BD2412 T 01:59, 17 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

"Savior (Christianity)" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Savior (Christianity) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 June 17 § Savior (Christianity) until a consensus is reached. 🌳 Balsam Cottonwood (talk) ✝ 08:14, 17 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Erin Reagan has been accepted

Erin Reagan, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

BD2412 T 21:59, 18 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Stephen DeWolf has been accepted

Stephen DeWolf, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

BD2412 T 03:06, 19 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Samuel Mellitz has been accepted

Samuel Mellitz, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

BD2412 T 03:26, 19 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

"Mercy fuck" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Mercy fuck has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 June 19 § Mercy fuck until a consensus is reached. User:Someone-123-321 (I contribute, Talk page so SineBot will shut up) 11:50, 19 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have no recollection of having created this, but strange things do happen. Cheers! BD2412 T 15:00, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Warren Truitt

On 20 June 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Warren Truitt, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Warren Truitt (pictured) served as a legislator in Oregon and a judge in Alaska in the 19th century, and as both a legislator and a judge in Idaho in the 20th? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Warren Truitt. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Warren Truitt), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Gatoclass (talk) 14:26, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Edward A. Mortimer Jr. has been accepted

Edward A. Mortimer Jr., which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

BD2412 T 03:16, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

"Battle of Manupur (1748)" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Battle of Manupur (1748) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 June 24 § Battle of Manupur (1748) until a consensus is reached. Noorullah (talk) 01:20, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Waller C. Caldwell

I have accepted Waller C. Caldwell, which you submitted to Articles for creation. I also noticed there was a note saying Walter Caldwell should point to this article, but there already seems to be a target to that redirect. I hope you can do the needful to disambiguate it. Thanks again, and happy editing! ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 11:47, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Bunnypranav: I suspect that was a typo. Walter and Waller are similar, but not so much as to get that treatment, I think. BD2412 T 19:47, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A user thought it would be a good idea to copy/paste nine district judge drafts into article space

Just giving you a heads up. I have already nominated all nine for AfD, as well as three associated redirects for XfD. The actual drafts are still in draft space and unaffected. Safiel (talk) 04:24, 3 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Additional note Chad Meredith was legitimately moved to article space through the Articles for Creation process and is not among the nine articles listed for deletion. Just in case you are wondering why it is in article space. Safiel (talk) 04:33, 3 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Alicia Hannah-Kim has been accepted

Alicia Hannah-Kim, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

BD2412 T 17:23, 3 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Plotkin's Vaccines has been accepted

Plotkin's Vaccines, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

BD2412 T 03:44, 5 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Undeletions

Hi - just looking at the two articles you undeleted for Fade999, Draft:Head Malkaani was mostly created by User:Studtick, who was blocked as a sock of banned User:Nauman335. Another sock of the same editor is User:N.edits335, who created Benazir Bhutto Bridge (which is why it was deleted G5). I hear quacking. Black Kite (talk) 21:42, 5 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, don't worry - I've just looked at their contribs and they're editing the same articles as Nauman335 socks, so I'm just going to block them and delete the articles again. Black Kite (talk) 21:48, 5 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- @Black Kite: I see no reason to doubt that this town and this bridge actually exist as described, and therefore see no benefit to the encyclopedia in deleting them. BD2412 T 21:49, 5 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  - They almost certainly do, but we can't simply accede to requests from socks of banned editors to do so. If you want to re-instate them yourself with a note in the undeletion log saying that you're taking responsibility for them then I don't see that's an issue, though. Black Kite (talk) 21:57, 5 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    - @Black Kite: I have restored the article on the bridge, for which some additional coverage exists. The draft appears from the sole cited source to be for a neighborhood rather than an independent locality, so I will not bother further with it. BD2412 T 22:05, 5 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bunk Gardner (judge) has been accepted

Bunk Gardner (judge), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Gheus (talk) 01:24, 6 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Disruptive edits and edit-warring on Michael Jackson pages

Hi, BD2412. Can you please have a look at the following articles and related Talk pages? [1], [2]

A couple of users are now engaging in disruptive behaviour, even seeking to use MJFacts.info, a known hate site as a source; per policy, fansites and anti-fansites are not accepted on Wikipedia. Thank you! Israell (talk) 02:40, 9 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I've now had to report him for edit warring: [3] He keeps reinserting this: [4]. Told him it doesn't belong to the timeline. It's just opinion issued ten years later. Israell (talk) 04:13, 9 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This looks resolved at this point. BD2412 T 14:55, 12 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nikolao v. Lyon has been accepted

Nikolao v. Lyon, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

BD2412 T 02:59, 9 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Knock knock

Whitespace on url is an error 👀––kemel49^{(connect)(contri)} 04:55, 12 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Noted. BD2412 T 14:52, 12 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sometime script can do malfunctioning, Preview is here for a reason.––kemel49^{(connect)(contri)} 15:07, 12 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Whack!

You've been whacked with a wet trout.

Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly.

Cook County Poor Farm, Illinois.––kemel49^{(connect)(contri)} 00:16, 22 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@KEmel49: That was uncalled for. I check URLs at the end of the run, which would have been in another few minutes. BD2412 T 00:18, 22 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Status

Does the English Wikipedia have a list of statuses? Thanks! (I love yourwiki (talk) 06:34, 13 July 2025 (UTC))[reply]

I am not sure what you mean by "list of statuses". BD2412 T 15:18, 13 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

For example, is there a list of things like "Advanced Verified Users" and the like? Thanks! (I love yourwiki (talk) 17:21, 13 July 2025 (UTC))[reply]

We have Wikipedia:List of administrators, with various lists by activity level, but I do not believe there is any sort of master list of users by verification level. BD2412 T 17:41, 13 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. (I love yourwiki (talk) 17:42, 13 July 2025 (UTC))[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Godhead in religions has been accepted

Godhead in religions, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

RangersRus (talk) 17:16, 15 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Fetisov Journalism Awards

Hello. Could you please see the draft I have revised? I have corrected the comments that were pointed out by another reviewer. I have found 3-4 independent authoritative sources that describe the award in detail:

1 (Forbes)
2 (SWI swissinfo)
3 (medienwoche.ch.). Thank you! 95.153.180.231 (talk) 20:28, 16 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Per Wikipedia:Solicited administrator actions, I do not act upon requests to avoid the appearance of impropriety. BD2412 T 20:30, 16 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Affect (company)

The article Affect (company) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NCORP. When you ignore the WP:USERG-violating GameFAQs it's essentially unsourced.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 04:18, 17 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Zxcvbnm: I'm not actually super attached to having an article on this subject myself, but Affect is a disambiguation page, and in the process of cleaning up links to that page I found several intending the company, so I preferred to create something for them to point to rather than remove the links. I would prefer if there were some possible alternative to deletion that would preserve those links. My concern is that editors will just re-link the company name, pointing back to the disambiguation page again. BD2412 T 12:12, 17 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This seems like a situation where there just shouldn't be a link. If someone links it to the DAB page, then that should just be reverted. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 12:20, 17 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You would think so, but it becomes a never-ending battle. It's easier to just have a target. Not necessarily this target, if there is perhaps a list mentioning the subject to which the link could point, but something rather than nothing. BD2412 T 12:26, 17 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

While annoying, there are tools to easily deal with situations like that, I use DisamAssist which can quickly remove any links to the DAB that are irrelevant in seconds. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 01:30, 18 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Zxcvbnm: How about we redirect this title to List of video game publishers, which lists Affect, and add this as a reference (or this) to that line. Then editors searching for the company can see that listing, and will know that's what we have on it. BD2412 T 01:36, 18 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: R. V. Bottomly has been accepted

R. V. Bottomly, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

BD2412 T 02:50, 18 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Stanley Zabka has been accepted

Stanley Zabka, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

BD2412 T 20:19, 19 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reply

What's your point on this? 2607:740:20:9:4B0C:473:8B1C:46DA (talk) 16:17, 22 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I was just curious as to whether we knew that the source got their numbers from Wikipedia, and not from the same place Wikipedia got the numbers from in the first place. BD2412 T 16:18, 22 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@BD2412: Wikipedia got numbers from Pinkvilla. Pinkvilla was reliable untill source untill the 10 July 2025. After 10 July 2025 it unreliable, per WP:PINKVILLA. The wikipedia number ₹97 was stated with Pinkvilla source as of revision on 26 May. The Economic Times article was also published on 26 May, including all content mentioned as WP:RSN. 2607:740:20:9:4B0C:473:8B1C:46DA (talk) 16:23, 22 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Draft

I noticed that you recently edited Jennifer Homendy. Can you look at my draft rewrite? I have added much more depth and history to the article. Mickeyronnie (talk) 23:37, 23 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Mickeyronnie: I only made gnoming edits to fix a template and category. However, since government officials are in my wheelhouse, I will have a look. BD2412 T 23:42, 23 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Edit: When asking an editor to look at a draft or other page, please remember to link the page you would like them to look at; in this case, this one. Thanks. BD2412 T 23:43, 23 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Done. BD2412 T 00:23, 24 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Frank Biegelmeier has been accepted

Frank Biegelmeier, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

BD2412 T 02:21, 24 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Possible Canvassing at RfC

Hi, BD2412. I pinged you and a couple of other editors in regard to possible canvassing at an RfC on the Michael Jackson article talk page. The editor in question even mass-pinged all those editors, incl. uninvolved editors and dormant accounts, above the opening RfC statement. Could you please have a look? Israell (talk) 22:11, 24 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

He pinged 18 editors, a few of which had already voted, and several of which are likely to vote "Yes" like he did. Israell (talk) 22:24, 24 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sydney Sanner has been accepted

Sydney Sanner, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

BD2412 T 16:26, 27 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Admin's Barnstar
	Thank you for your efforts as a Wikimedia admin. I truly appreciate your work:) Baqi:) (talk) 22:06, 27 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks! I certainly appreciate the thought, but I am wondering if there is something specifically that prompted this. Cheers! BD2412 T 23:59, 27 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]