|
1.���� Claude
Panaccio: Late Medieval Nominalism
and Non-Veridical Concepts (provides a detailed critique of a
central argument of my John Buridan), and here is my reply: Demon Skepticism and
Non-Veridical Concepts, read at the 2009 APA convention in
NYC
2.���� Buridan on Substantial
Unity and Substantial� Concepts, comments
on Henrik Lagerlund: John Buridan's Empiricism
and the Knowledge of Substances, read at the UWO Colloquium,
October 9, 2009
3.���� "Intentional Transfer in
Averroes, Indifference of Nature in Avicenna, and the Issue of the
Representationalism of Aquinas" comments on Richard Taylor�s
and Max Herrera�s papers
4.���� "Putting Skeptics in Their
Place vs. Stopping Them in Their Tracks", comments by
Giorgio
Pini and John Greco, and
my replies
5.���� Reply to Tony
Roark on Tarski and Klima:
Conceptual Closure in Anselm�s Proof
6.���� Contemporary 'Essentialism' vs. Aristotelian Essentialism
7.���� Comments on Klima,
Contemporary "Essentialism" vs. Aristotelian Essentialism,
by
Michael Kremer
8.���� Reply to Michael Kremer
9.���� Nulla virtus cognoscitiva
circa proprium obiectum decipitur comments on Robert Pasnau: The Identity of the Knower and the Known
10.� Review
of Anthony Kenny: Aquinas on Mind
11.�
Comments on Peter King: "The Failure of Ockham�s
Nominalism"
12.� "Is Ockham off the hook?"
13.� Reply to David Burrell's
comments
on "Man = Body + Soul:
Aquinas's Arithmetic of Human Nature"
14.� "What can a scholastic do in
the 21st century?"
15.� Comments on Jack
Zupko: "Philosophy Among the
Artistae: A Late-Medieval Picture of the Limits of Rational Inquiry"
16.� "Semantic Complexity and
Syntactic Simplicity in Ockham's Mental Language" comments on
Yiwei Zheng: "Ockham's Connotation Theory and Ontological Elimination"
|
