Author
Listed:
- Kulkarni, Amey
- Shastri, Yogendra
- Kumar, Manoj
Abstract
Agricultural residue can produce about 20 million metric tonnes (MMT) of compressed biogas (CBG) in India. However, successful commercialization of CBG production from these residues requires addressing several technological, economic, and environmental challenges. This work first critically reviews the current status of the complete CBG production value chain, i.e., feedstock production and supply, pretreatment, anaerobic digestion, biogas purification, and compression and storage. Literature studies quantifying the environmental impacts and assessing the techno-economic performance of biogas/CBG production are reviewed. Additionally, various government schemes and policies aimed at fostering the CBG economy in India are discussed. Finally, challenges faced by the CBG industry along with potential recommendations are highlighted. The review found that India had approximately 234 MMT surplus agricultural residues majorly comprising rice straw (43.85 MMT), wheat straw (25.07 MMT), sugarcane bagasse (41.56 MMT), and cotton stalk (29.74 MMT). Further, pretreatment of these residues before anaerobic digestion could increase the biogas yield by 33–317 %. For many CBG production processes, electricity was the major contributor to the global warming potential (GWP) and cleaner power grids could lower the impacts. Furthermore, 80 % of the capital cost was attributed to machinery and equipment, 10 % to land acquisition and 6 % to infrastructure creation, whereas the operational cost was majorly dominated by the feedstock cost (26 %). Finally, the review found that government support in the form of subsidies, waivers, and guaranteed markets could ease off the investor burdens and make the project economically viable.
Suggested Citation
Kulkarni, Amey & Shastri, Yogendra & Kumar, Manoj, 2025.
"Compressed biogas production from agricultural residues in India: A techno-enviro-economic overview,"
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 219(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:rensus:v:219:y:2025:i:c:s1364032125005611
DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2025.115888
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:219:y:2025:i:c:s1364032125005611. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600126/description#description .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.