Abbink, D.A., et al.: A topology of shared control systems-finding common ground in diversity. IEEE Trans. Hum. Mach. Syst. 48(5), 509–525 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1109/THMS.2018.2791570
Article
Google Scholar
Abbink, D.A., Mulder, M.: Neuromuscular analysis as a guideline in designing shared control (2010). https://doi.org/10.5772/8696
Altendorf, E., Baltzer, M., Heesen, M., Kienle, M., Weißgerber, T., Flemisch, F.: H-Mode: a haptic-multimodal interaction concept for cooperative guidance and control of partially and highly automated vehicles. In: Winner, H., Hakuli, S., Lotz, F., Singer, C. (eds.) Handbook of Driver Assistance Systems, pp. 1499–1518. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12352-3_60
Chapter
Google Scholar
Altendorf, E., Schreck, C., Weßel, G., Canpolat, Y., Flemisch, F.: Utility assessment in automated driving for cooperative human–machine systems. Cogn. Technol. Work 21(4), 607–619 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-019-00557-4
Article
Google Scholar
Bhardwaj, A., et al.: Who’s the boss? Arbitrating control authority between a human driver and automation system. Transport. Res. F: Traffic Psychol. Behav. 68, 144–160 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2019.12.005
Article
Google Scholar
Carlson, T., Monnard, G., Leeb, R., Millán, J.D.R.: Evaluation of proportional and discrete shared control paradigms for low resolution user inputs. In: 2011 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, pp. 1044–1049 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSMC.2011.6083812
Cimolino, G., Graham, T.N.: Two heads are better than one: a dimension space for unifying human and artificial intelligence in shared control. In: CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1–21 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3517610
Damböck, D., Kienle, M., Bengler, K., Bubb, H.: The H-metaphor as an example for cooperative vehicle driving. In: Jacko, J.A. (ed.) HCI 2011. LNCS, vol. 6763, pp. 376–385. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21616-9_42
Chapter
Google Scholar
Della Penna, M., van Paassen, M.M., Abbink, D.A., Mulder, M., Mulder, M.: Reducing steering wheel stiffness is beneficial in supporting evasive maneuvers. In: 2013 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, pp. 1628–1635 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSMC.2010.5642388
de Winter, J., Dodou, D.: Preparing drivers for dangerous situations: a critical reflection on continuous shared control. In: IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC), pp. 1050–1056 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSMC.2011.6083813
de Winter, J., Petermeijer, S.M., Abbink, D.A.: Shared control versus traded control in driving: a debate around automation pitfalls. Ergonomics 1–27 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2022.2153175
Flemisch, F., Abbink, D., Itoh, M., Pacaux-Lemoine, M.-P., Weßel, G.: Shared control is the sharp end of cooperation: towards a common framework of joint action, shared control and human machine cooperation. In: 13th IFAC Symposium on Analysis, Design, and Evaluation of Human-Machine Systems HMS 2016. IFAC-PapersOnLine 49(19), 72–77 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2016.10.464
Flemisch, F., Abbink, D.A., Itoh, M., Pacaux-Lemoine, M.-P., Weßel, G.: Joining the blunt and the pointy end of the spear: towards a common framework of joint action, human–machine cooperation, cooperative guidance and control, shared, traded and supervisory control. Cogn. Technol. Work 21(4), 555–568 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-019-00576-1
Article
Google Scholar
Flemisch, F., Adams, C.A., Conway, S.R., Goodrich, K.H., Palmer, M.T., Schutte, P.C.: The H-metaphor as a guideline for vehicle automation and interaction (2003). https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20040031835
Flemisch, F., Kelsch, J., Löper, C., Schieben, A., Schindler, J., Heesen, M.: Cooperative control and active interfaces for vehicle assistance and automation (2008)
Google Scholar
French, D.J., West, R.J., Elander, J., Wilding, J.M.: Decisionmaking style, driving style, and self-reported involvement in road traffic accidents. Ergonomics 36(6), 627–644 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139308967925
Article
Google Scholar
Gold, C., Damböck, D., Lorenz, L., Bengler, K.: “take over!” how long does it take to get the driver back into the loop? Proc. Hum. Factors Ergon. Soc. Annu. Meet. 57(1), 1938–1942 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1177/1541931213571433
Guo, C., Sentouh, C., Popieul, J.-C., Soualmi, B., Haué, J.-B.: Shared control framework applied for vehicle longitudinal control in highway merging scenarios. In: 2015 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, pp. 3098–3103 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1109/SMC.2015.538
Hiraoka, T.: How do we share the “control” when using the haptic shared control for an advanced driver-assistance system? -Direct HSC and indirect HSC. IFAC-PapersOnLine 52(19), 61–66 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2019.12.107
Hoc, J.-M.: Towards a cognitive approach to human-machine cooperation in dynamic situations. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 54(4), 509–540 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1006/ijhc.2000.0454
Article
Google Scholar
Illgner, J., Milicic, N., Biebl, B., Baumann, M.: Improving driver engagement with level 2 automated systems: the impact of fully shared longitudinal control. In: Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, pp. 43–52 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1145/3640792.3675708
Inagaki, T.: Adaptive automation: sharing and trading of control. In: The Proceedings of the Transportation and Logistics Conference 2001, p. 10 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1299/jsmetld.2001.10.79
Izadi, V., Ghasemi, A.H.: Quantifying the performance of an adaptive haptic shared control paradigm for steering a ground-vehicle. Transp. Eng. 10, 100141 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.treng.2022.100141
Article
Google Scholar
Kaber, D.B., Endsley, M.R.: The effects of level of automation and adaptive automation on human performance, situation awareness and workload in a dynamic control task. Theor. Issues Ergon. Sci. 5(2), 113–153 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1080/1463922021000054335
Article
Google Scholar
Kennedy, R.S., Lane, N.E., Berbaum, K.S., Lilienthal, M.G.: Simulator sickness questionnaire: an enhanced method for quantifying simulator sickness. Int. J. Aviat. Psychol. 3(3), 203–220 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327108ijap0303_3
Article
Google Scholar
Kuramochi, H., Utsumi, A., Ikeda, T., Kato, Y.O., Nagasawa, I., Takahashi, K.: Effect of human-machine cooperation on driving comfort in highly automated steering maneuvers. In: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications: Adjunct Proceedings, pp. 151–155 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1145/3349263.3351498
Lee, A.T.: Vehicle simulation: perceptual fidelity in the design of virtual environments, 1st edn. CRC Press (2018). https://doi.org/10.1201/b22297
Luo, R., et al.: A workload adaptive haptic shared control scheme for semi-autonomous driving. Accid. Anal. Prev. 152, 105968 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2020.105968
Article
Google Scholar
Marcano, M.: Shared control strategies for automated vehicles [Doctoral dissertation, Universidad del País Vasco], Spain (2022)
Google Scholar
Marcano, M., Tango, F., Sarabia, J., Chiesa, S., Pérez, J., Díaz, S.: Can shared control improve overtaking performance? Combining human and automation strengths for a safer maneuver. Sensors 22(23), 9093 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/s22239093
Article
Google Scholar
Michon, J.A.: A critical view of driver behavior models: what do we know, what should we do? In: Human Behavior and Traffic Safety, pp. 485– 524. Springer (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-2173-6_19
Mulder, M., Abbink, D.A.: Correct and faulty driver support from shared haptic control during evasive maneuvers. In: 2011 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, pp. 1057–1062 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSMC.2011.6083814
Pacaux-Lemoine, M.-P., Makoto, I.: Towards vertical and horizontal extension of shared control concept. In: 2015 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, pp. 3086–3091 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1109/SMC.2015.536
Peintner, J., Escher, B., Detjen, H., Manger, C., Riener, A.: How to design human-vehicle cooperation for automated driving: a review of use cases, concepts, and interfaces. Multimodal Technol. Interact. 8(3), 16 (2024). https://doi.org/10.3390/mti8030016
Article
Google Scholar
Peintner, J., Manger, C., Riener, A.: Communication of uncertainty information in cooperative, automated driving: a comparative study of different modalities. In: Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, pp. 322–332 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1145/3580585.3607154
Profumo, L., Pollini, L., Abbink, D.A.: Direct and indirect haptic aiding for curve negotiation. In: 2013 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, pp. 1846–1852 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1109/SMC.2013.318
SAE International. Surface vehicle recommended practice: Taxonomy and definitions for terms related to driving automation systems for on road motor vehicles (2021). https://www.sae.org/standards/content/j3016_202104/. Accessed 12 Jan 2023
Saito, Y., Mitsumoto, T., Raksincharoensak, P.: Effectiveness of a risk predictive shared steering control based on potential risk prediction of collision with vulnerable road users. IFAC-PapersOnLine 49(19), 84–89 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2016.10.466
Article
Google Scholar
Schwindt-Drews, S., Storms, K., Peters, S., Abendroth, B.: Acceptance and trust: drivers’ first contact with released automated vehicles in naturalistic traffic. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 25(11), 18601–18610 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2024.3443927
Article
Google Scholar
Sheridan, T., Verplank, W., Brooks, T.: Human and computer control of undersea teleoperators (1978)
Google Scholar
Simucube. Simucube tuner software (2024). https://simucube.com/docs/tuner/. Accessed 18 Dec 2024
Tabone, W., et al.: Vulnerable road users and the coming wave of automated vehicles: expert perspectives. Transp. Res. Interdisc. Perspect. 9, 100293 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2020.100293
Article
Google Scholar
van Dintel, K.M., Petermeijer, S.M., de Vries, E.J., Abbink, D.A.: Transitioning back from SAE-L3 autonomy comparing traded and shared control. In: Proceedings of the Driving Simulation Conference 2020, DSC 2020 Europe, pp. 75–82 (2020)
Google Scholar
Walch, M., Colley, M., Weber, M.: Driving-task-related human-machine interaction in automated driving: towards a bigger picture. In: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications: Adjunct Proceedings, pp. 427–433 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1145/3349263.3351527
Wang, Z., Gong, X., Li, X., Li, X., Huang, J.: Human-machine shared steering control under high-speed emergency obstacle avoidance scenarios. Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board (2023). https://doi.org/10.1177/03611981231203221
Article
Google Scholar
You, F., Deng, H., Hansen, P., Zhang, J.: Research on transparency design based on shared situation awareness in semi-automatic driving. Appl. Sci. 12(14), 7177 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/app12147177
Article
Google Scholar