Reliability and responsiveness of three different pain assessments
- PMID: 11766958
- DOI: 10.1080/165019701753236473
Reliability and responsiveness of three different pain assessments
Abstract
The visual analogue scale (VAS) and ordered categorical scales, i.e. numeric rating scales (NRS), are commonly used in the assessment of pain. However, these scales are bounded by fixed endpoints and thus the range of measurement is limited. The disparity in repeated assessments of perceived pain intensity with the VAS, NRS, and electrical stimulation applied as a matching stimulus was studied in 69 patients (48 women and 21 men, 19-72 years) with chronic nociceptive or neurogenic pain. Responsiveness with transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) using the same measurement procedures was evaluated in the same patients. Comparison of results from the three pain assessments showed that the painmatcher is at least as reliable and responsive as VAS and NRS. None of the three measurements showed evidence for systematic disagreement and had only significant random individual disagreement. They also showed evidence for responsiveness.
Similar articles
-
Acute oral pain intensity and pain threshold assessed by intensity matching to pain induced by electrical stimuli.J Orofac Pain. 2003 Spring;17(2):151-9. J Orofac Pain. 2003. PMID: 12836504
-
Validity of electrical stimulus magnitude matching in chronic pain.J Rehabil Med. 2009 Nov;41(11):898-903. doi: 10.2340/16501977-0428. J Rehabil Med. 2009. PMID: 19841841
-
The use of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) in a major cancer center for the treatment of severe cancer-related pain and associated disability.Pain Med. 2015 Jun;16(6):1204-10. doi: 10.1111/pme.12038. Epub 2013 Feb 25. Pain Med. 2015. PMID: 23438255
-
Pain: a review of three commonly used pain rating scales.J Clin Nurs. 2005 Aug;14(7):798-804. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2005.01121.x. J Clin Nurs. 2005. PMID: 16000093 Review.
-
Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for relieving acute pain in the prehospital setting: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized-controlled trials.Eur J Emerg Med. 2014 Feb;21(1):10-7. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0b013e328363c9c1. Eur J Emerg Med. 2014. PMID: 23839103 Review.
Cited by
-
Prediction of an unfavourable course of low back pain in general practice: comparison of four instruments.Br J Gen Pract. 2007 Jan;57(534):15-22. Br J Gen Pract. 2007. PMID: 17244419 Free PMC article.
-
Percutaneous auricular neuromodulation (nerve stimulation) for the treatment of pain following total knee arthroplasty: a randomized, double-masked, sham-controlled pilot study.Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2025 Jan 7;50(1):26-35. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2023-105028. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2025. PMID: 38388019 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Wearable, noninvasive, pulsed shortwave (radiofrequency) therapy for postoperative analgesia: A randomized, double-masked, sham-controlled pilot study.Pain Pract. 2025 Feb;25(2):e70007. doi: 10.1111/papr.70007. Pain Pract. 2025. PMID: 39829429 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Prediction of post-operative pain following arthroscopic subacromial decompression surgery: an observational study.F1000Res. 2013 Feb 4;2:31. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.2-31.v1. eCollection 2013. F1000Res. 2013. PMID: 24358863 Free PMC article.
-
Electromyographic activity of the cervical flexor muscles in patients with temporomandibular disorders while performing the craniocervical flexion test: a cross-sectional study.Phys Ther. 2011 Aug;91(8):1184-97. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20100233. Epub 2011 Jun 9. Phys Ther. 2011. PMID: 21659465 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources