A two-dimensional neuropsychology of defense: fear/anxiety and defensive distance
- PMID: 15225972
- DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2004.03.005
A two-dimensional neuropsychology of defense: fear/anxiety and defensive distance
Abstract
We present in this paper a picture of the neural systems controlling defense that updates and simplifies Gray's "Neuropsychology of Anxiety". It is based on two behavioural dimensions: 'defensive distance' as defined by the Blanchards and 'defensive direction'. Defensive direction is a categorical dimension with avoidance of threat corresponding to fear and approach to threat corresponding to anxiety. These two psychological dimensions are mapped to underlying neural dimensions. Defensive distance is mapped to neural level, with the shortest defensive distances involving the lowest neural level (periaqueductal grey) and the largest defensive distances the highest neural level (prefrontal cortex). Defensive direction is mapped to separate parallel streams that run across these levels. A significant departure from prior models is the proposal that both fear and anxiety are represented at all levels. The theory is presented in a simplified form that does not incorporate the interactions that must occur between non-adjacent levels of the system. It also requires expansion to include the dimension of escapability of threat. Our current development and these proposed future extensions do not change the core concepts originally proposed by Gray and, we argue, demonstrate their enduring value.
Similar articles
-
Reactions to threat and personality: psychometric differentiation of intensity and direction dimensions of human defensive behaviour.Behav Brain Res. 2006 Apr 25;169(1):21-8. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2005.11.027. Epub 2006 Jan 6. Behav Brain Res. 2006. PMID: 16406105 Clinical Trial.
-
Differential effects of infralimbic vs. ventromedial orbital PFC lidocaine infusions in CD-1 mice on defensive responding in the mouse defense test battery and rat exposure test.Brain Res. 2004 Sep 10;1020(1-2):73-85. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2004.06.008. Brain Res. 2004. PMID: 15312789
-
Nitric oxide involvement and neural substrates of the conditioned and innate fear as evaluated in the T-maze test in rats.Behav Brain Res. 2008 Jun 3;189(2):341-9. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2008.01.018. Epub 2008 Feb 7. Behav Brain Res. 2008. PMID: 18342958
-
Serotonin, the periaqueductal gray and panic.Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2004 May;28(3):239-59. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2003.12.004. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2004. PMID: 15225969 Review.
-
[Functional heterogeneity of the limbic structures of the brain in organizing feeding and defensive behaviors].Usp Fiziol Nauk. 1985 Jan-Mar;16(1):62-75. Usp Fiziol Nauk. 1985. PMID: 3919509 Review. Russian. No abstract available.
Cited by
-
Acute stress promotes effort mobilization for safety-related goals.Commun Psychol. 2024 Jun 1;2(1):50. doi: 10.1038/s44271-024-00103-7. Commun Psychol. 2024. PMID: 39242906 Free PMC article.
-
Associations between respiratory sinus arrhythmia reactivity and internalizing and externalizing symptoms are emotion specific.Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2013 Jun;13(2):238-51. doi: 10.3758/s13415-012-0136-4. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2013. PMID: 23233122 Free PMC article.
-
Pain-Related Fear-Dissociable Neural Sources of Different Fear Constructs.eNeuro. 2019 Jan 3;5(6):ENEURO.0107-18.2018. doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0107-18.2018. eCollection 2018 Nov-Dec. eNeuro. 2019. PMID: 30627654 Free PMC article.
-
Social approach-avoidance behavior of a high-anxiety strain of rats: effects of benzodiazepine receptor ligands.Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2006 Jan;184(1):65-74. doi: 10.1007/s00213-005-0233-y. Epub 2005 Dec 3. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2006. PMID: 16328377
-
From Empathy to Apathy: The Bystander Effect Revisited.Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2018 Aug;27(4):249-256. doi: 10.1177/0963721417749653. Epub 2018 Aug 1. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2018. PMID: 30166777 Free PMC article.
