Comparison of search strategies for recalling double-blind trials from MEDLINE
- PMID: 1802637
Comparison of search strategies for recalling double-blind trials from MEDLINE
Abstract
To minimise the effect of reference bias in literature retrieval, it is important to use computerised search strategies that give a high yield of relevant reports. In a MEDLINE search that included the Medical Subject Heading (MeSH) "Comparative study," the recall of double-blind trials of NSAIDs in rheumatoid arthritis was 93.1% (122/131) and the precision was 19.0% (122/641). When "Double-blind method" was used, either as MeSH or text words, the recall was only 72.5% (95/131) with a precision of 22.7% (95/419). A combined search strategy increased the recall to 97.7% (128/131) with a precision of 17.3% (128/738). With the MeSH term "Random allocation" only eight relevant reports were retrieved, and none was new. By using "Clinical trials" alone, we would have missed eleven reports. We conclude that "Comparative study" is preferable to "Double-blind method" when searching double-blind trials on MEDLINE.
Similar articles
-
Comparison of search strategies on CD Plus/MEDLINE.CMAJ. 1991 Sep 1;145(5):457-64. CMAJ. 1991. PMID: 1878827 Free PMC article.
-
Retrieving randomized controlled trials from medline: a comparison of 38 published search filters.Health Info Libr J. 2009 Sep;26(3):187-202. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-1842.2008.00827.x. Health Info Libr J. 2009. PMID: 19712211
-
Searching MEDLINE for randomized clinical trials involving care of the newborn.Pediatrics. 1989 Apr;83(4):543-6. Pediatrics. 1989. PMID: 2648304
-
Integrity and research: introducing the concept of dual blindness. how blind are double-blind clinical trials in alternative medicine?J Altern Complement Med. 2000 Dec;6(6):493-8. doi: 10.1089/acm.2000.6.493. J Altern Complement Med. 2000. PMID: 11152053 Review.
-
Content of reports on clinical trials: a critical review.Control Clin Trials. 1984 Dec;5(4):328-47. doi: 10.1016/s0197-2456(84)80013-6. Control Clin Trials. 1984. PMID: 6394208 Review.
Cited by
-
How to identify randomized controlled trials in MEDLINE: ten years on.J Med Libr Assoc. 2006 Apr;94(2):130-6. J Med Libr Assoc. 2006. PMID: 16636704 Free PMC article.
-
Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews.BMJ. 1994 Nov 12;309(6964):1286-91. doi: 10.1136/bmj.309.6964.1286. BMJ. 1994. PMID: 7718048 Free PMC article.
-
Which resources should be used to identify RCT/CCTs for systematic reviews: a systematic review.BMC Med Res Methodol. 2005 Aug 10;5:24. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-5-24. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2005. PMID: 16092960 Free PMC article.
-
Handsearching versus electronic searching to identify reports of randomized trials.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Apr 18;2007(2):MR000001. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000001.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007. PMID: 17443625 Free PMC article.
-
Developing optimal search strategies for detecting clinically sound studies in MEDLINE.J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1994 Nov-Dec;1(6):447-58. doi: 10.1136/jamia.1994.95153434. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1994. PMID: 7850570 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Medical