Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2011 Apr;34(4):818-22.
doi: 10.2337/dc10-1793. Epub 2011 Feb 25.

A comparative evaluation of amitriptyline and duloxetine in painful diabetic neuropathy: a randomized, double-blind, cross-over clinical trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

A comparative evaluation of amitriptyline and duloxetine in painful diabetic neuropathy: a randomized, double-blind, cross-over clinical trial

Harjot Kaur et al. Diabetes Care. 2011 Apr.

Abstract

Objective: To compare the efficacy and safety of duloxetine and amitriptyline in painful diabetic neuropathy (PDN).

Research design and methods: In this randomized, double-blind, cross-over, active-control trial, 58 patients received amitriptyline and duloxetine orally once daily at bedtime, each for 6 weeks with optional dose uptitration fortnightly. Single-blinded placebo washout was given for 2 weeks between the two treatments and a single-blinded placebo run-out phase of 4 weeks was given at the end of the treatment period. Pain relief was measured by the patient's global assessment of efficacy, using a visual analog scale (0-100) as a primary end point, and overall improvement and adverse events were assessed as secondary outcome measures. Median pain score reductions of >50%, 25-50%, and <25% were considered good, moderate, and mild responses, respectively.

Results: There was a significant improvement in pain with both treatments compared with their baseline values (P < 0.001 for both). Good, moderate, and mild pain relief was achieved in 55, 24, and 15% of patients, respectively, on amitriptyline and 59, 21, and 9% of patients, respectively, on duloxetine. There were no significant differences in various other outcome measures between the groups. Of the reported adverse events, dry mouth was significantly more common with amitriptyline than duloxetine (55 vs. 24%; P < 0.01). Although, numerically, more patients preferred duloxetine, overall this was not statistically significant (48 vs. 36%; P = 0.18).

Conclusions: Both duloxetine and amitriptyline demonstrated similar efficacy in PDN. A large, multicentric clinical trial in other populations could possibly demonstrate the superiority of either drug.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
CONSORT statement.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Median VAS pain scores of patients.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. American Diabetes Association Standards of medical care in diabetes: 2009. Diabetes Care 2009;32(Suppl. 1):S13–S61 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sultan A, Gaskell H, Derry S, Moore RA. Duloxetine for painful diabetic neuropathy and fibromyalgia pain: systematic review of randomised trials. BMC Neurol 2008;8:29. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lunn MP, Hughes RA, Wiffen PJ. Duloxetine for treating painful neuropathy or chronic pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009;7:CD007115. - PubMed
    1. Raskin J, Pritchett YL, Wang F, et al. A double-blind, randomized multicenter trial comparing duloxetine with placebo in the management of diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain. Pain Med 2005;6:346–356 - PubMed
    1. Goldstein DJ, Lu Y, Detke MJ, Lee TC, Iyengar S. Duloxetine vs. placebo in patients with painful diabetic neuropathy. Pain 2005;116:109–118 - PubMed

Publication types