Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 1990;181(1):1-17.
doi: 10.1007/BF00189723.

Structure-function relationships in identified afferent neurones

Affiliations
Review

Structure-function relationships in identified afferent neurones

S Mense. Anat Embryol (Berl). 1990.

Abstract

The review deals with structure-function relationships in primary afferent and spinal cord neurones that were intracellularly injected with a marker substance (mostly HRP) after physiological identification. At the level of dorsal root ganglion (DRG) cells, there is a significant correlation between soma size and conduction velocity (or diameter) of the afferent fibre for most subpopulations of DRG cells, but the scatter of data is considerable, so that the size of a DRG cell soma cannot be predicted from the diameter of its axon or vice versa. The spinal terminations of primary afferent fibres are the best example of a relationship between structure and function, since most of the afferent units possess characteristic patterns of spinal arborization, e.g. the "flame-shaped arbors" of hair follicle afferents in lamina III of the dorsal horn, or the projection of nociceptive afferents onto lamina I. The morphological features of spinal cord neurones can be used only to a limited extent for functional identification. Thus, many SCT neurones can be recognized by their triangular dendritic tree and STT cells in lamina VII/VIII by their dendritic projection into the white matter. It is still not possible, however, to distinguish a nociceptive STT cell from a low-threshold mechanoreceptive one on the basis of morphological criteria.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. J Comp Neurol. 1983 May 10;216(2):162-74 - PubMed
    1. J Comp Neurol. 1979 Apr 15;184(4):643-84 - PubMed
    1. J Comp Neurol. 1987 Jul 8;261(2):221-36 - PubMed
    1. J Physiol. 1982 Feb;323:77-91 - PubMed
    1. Science. 1966 Mar 25;151(3717):1538-9 - PubMed

MeSH terms

Substances