Randomized clinical trial assessing whether additional massage treatments for chronic neck pain improve 12- and 26-week outcomes
- PMID: 26096474
- PMCID: PMC4596391
- DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2015.06.049
Randomized clinical trial assessing whether additional massage treatments for chronic neck pain improve 12- and 26-week outcomes
Abstract
Background context: This is the first study to systematically evaluate the value of a longer treatment period for massage. We provide a framework of how to conceptualize an optimal dose in this challenging setting of nonpharmacologic treatments.
Purpose: The aim was to determine the optimal dose of massage for neck pain.
Study design/setting: Two-phase randomized trial for persons with chronic nonspecific neck pain. Primary randomization to one of five groups receiving 4 weeks of massage (30 minutes 2x/or 3x/wk or 60 minutes 1x, 2x, or 3x/wk). Booster randomization of participants to receive an additional six massages, 60 minutes 1x/wk, or no additional massage.
Patient sample: A total of 179 participants from Group Health and the general population of Seattle, WA, USA recruited between June 2010 and August 2011 were included.
Outcome measures: Primary outcomes self-reported neck-related dysfunction (Neck Disability Index) and pain (0-10 scale) were assessed at baseline, 12, and 26 weeks. Clinically meaningful improvement was defined as greater than or equal to 5-point decrease in dysfunction and greater than or equal to 30% decrease in pain from baseline.
Methods: Clinically meaningful improvement for each primary outcome with both follow-up times was analyzed using adjusted modified Poisson generalized estimating equations (GEEs). Secondary analyses for the continuous outcomes used linear GEEs.
Results: There were no observed differences by primary treatment group at 12 or 26 weeks. Those receiving booster dose had improvements in both dysfunction and pain at 12 weeks (dysfunction: relative risk [RR]=1.56 [1.08-2.25], p=.018; pain: RR=1.25 [0.98-1.61], p=.077), but those were nonsignificant at 26 weeks (dysfunction: RR=1.22 [0.85-1.74]; pain: RR=1.09 [0.82-1.43]). Subgroup analysis by primary and booster treatments found the booster dose only effective among those initially randomized to one of the 60-minute massage groups.
Conclusions: "Booster" doses for those initially receiving 60 minutes of massage should be incorporated into future trials of massage for chronic neck pain.
Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01122836.
Keywords: Chronic neck pain; Clinical trial methods; Complementary medicine; Dosing; Massage; Randomized clinical trial.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Five-week outcomes from a dosing trial of therapeutic massage for chronic neck pain.Ann Fam Med. 2014 Mar-Apr;12(2):112-20. doi: 10.1370/afm.1602. Ann Fam Med. 2014. PMID: 24615306 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Dosing study of massage for chronic neck pain: protocol for the dose response evaluation and analysis of massage [DREAM] trial.BMC Complement Altern Med. 2012 Sep 18;12:158. doi: 10.1186/1472-6882-12-158. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2012. PMID: 22985134 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Efficacy of tuina in patients with chronic neck pain: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.Trials. 2019 Jan 17;20(1):59. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-3096-3. Trials. 2019. PMID: 30654844 Free PMC article.
-
Chronic Neck Pain: Nonpharmacologic Treatment.Am Fam Physician. 2019 Aug 1;100(3):180-182. Am Fam Physician. 2019. PMID: 31361100 Review. No abstract available.
-
Description of massage interventions in randomised clinical trials for neck pain; a review using the TIDieR checklist.Clin Rehabil. 2024 Mar;38(3):375-392. doi: 10.1177/02692155231210377. Epub 2023 Oct 31. Clin Rehabil. 2024. PMID: 37908084 Review.
Cited by
-
Scanning the Global Literature.Glob Adv Health Med. 2015 Sep;4(5):61-4. doi: 10.7453/gahmj.2015.102. Epub 2015 Sep 1. Glob Adv Health Med. 2015. PMID: 26421236 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Public Awareness and Perception of Risks Associated With Neck Manipulations in Southern Saudi Arabia.Cureus. 2024 Dec 9;16(12):e75420. doi: 10.7759/cureus.75420. eCollection 2024 Dec. Cureus. 2024. PMID: 39791096 Free PMC article.
-
Musculoskeletal Ultrasound Assessment of the Clinical Efficacy of the Combination of Acupressure and "Three Methods of Neck Movement (TCM)" Therapy in the Treatment of Cervical Spondylosis: A Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.J Pain Res. 2024 Nov 8;17:3651-3665. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S469511. eCollection 2024. J Pain Res. 2024. PMID: 39534754 Free PMC article.
-
Departing Thoughts from IJTMB's Practice & Education Section Editor: Critical Inquiry, Dichotomy vs. Continuum, and Improving TMB Discourse.Int J Ther Massage Bodywork. 2016 Mar 4;9(1):1-3. doi: 10.3822/ijtmb.v9i1.317. eCollection 2016 Mar. Int J Ther Massage Bodywork. 2016. PMID: 26977214 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Therapist-Delivered Versus Care Ally-Assisted Massage for Veterans With Chronic Neck Pain: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.JMIR Res Protoc. 2022 Sep 27;11(9):e38950. doi: 10.2196/38950. JMIR Res Protoc. 2022. PMID: 36166287 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Berman J, Chesney MA. Complementary and alternative medicine in 2006: optimising the dose of the intervention. Med J Aust. 2005;183(11–12):574–5. - PubMed
-
- Haraldsson BG, et al. Massage for mechanical neck disorders. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006;3:CD004871. - PubMed
-
- Patel KC, et al. Massage for mechanical neck disorders. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;9:CD004871. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical