Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017;12(1):5.
doi: 10.1186/s41039-017-0050-z. Epub 2017 Jan 23.

Supporting cross-cultural online discussion with formal and informal platforms: a case between Hong Kong and Taiwan

Liping Deng  1 , Yang-Hsueh Chen  2 , Sandy C Li  1
Affiliations

Supporting cross-cultural online discussion with formal and informal platforms: a case between Hong Kong and Taiwan

Liping Deng et al. Res Pract Technol Enhanc Learn. 2017.

Abstract

The paper reports on a collaborative project on fostering cross-cultural online discussion between two universities with one in Hong Kong and the other in Taiwan. Two online platforms-Moodle as a formal channel for course-related discussion and Facebook as an informal channel for social-oriented interaction-were employed. The study pays special attention to instructional design based on research-derived strategies and reflects on the effects of various strategies as well as students' experiences and perceptions. The results show that the students perceived the online discussion as valuable for exchanging perspectives and enhancing cross-cultural understanding. However, they were less motivated to use Facebook as the informal channel for socialization. The challenges encountered especially those concerning using Facebook in formal learning environments will be discussed. At the end, the recommendations for better utilizing and bringing together formal and informal online platforms will be suggested.

Keywords: Course management system; Cross-cultural communication; Facebook; Higher education; Online discussion.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Framework of formal/informal learning
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Instructional design of cross-cultural discussion
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Students’ self-introduction pages designed with Lino
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

References

    1. Barnett-Queen T, Blair R, Merrick M. Student perspectives of online discussions: strengths and weaknesses. Journal of Technology in Human Services. 2005;23(3-4):229–244. doi: 10.1300/J017v23n03_05. - DOI
    1. Chang CK, Chen GD, Hsu CK. Providing adequate interactions in online discussion forums using few teaching assistants. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology. 2011;10(3):193–202.
    1. Cheung WS, Hew KF, Ng SL. Toward an understanding of why students contribute in asynchronous online discussions. Journal of Educational Computing Research. 2008;38(1):29–50. doi: 10.2190/EC.38.1.b. - DOI
    1. Cho H, Gay G, Davidson B, Ingraffea A. Social networks, communication styles, and learning performance in a CSCL community. Computers & Education. 2007;49(2):309–329. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2005.07.003. - DOI
    1. Coates H, James R, Baldwin G. A critical examination of the effects of learning management systems on university teaching and learning. Tertiary Education & Management. 2005;11(1):19–36. doi: 10.1080/13583883.2005.9967137. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources